VCDQuality Forums - The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers *XViD* - DVD SCR

Pages (5): [1] 2 3 4 5 »
Show all 100 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- DIVX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers *XViD* - DVD SCR - ViTE (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=13381)

Posted by crob on 01-09-2003 01:49 PM:

Ahhhh. Lovely!

Posted by sp00ky on 01-09-2003 02:23 PM:

135 kbps mp3?

anyway, mad props to vite!

*looks out for an internal or will try to get the dvdr*

//spoo

Posted by CobyDK on 01-09-2003 02:31 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by sp00ky
135 kbps mp3?

anyway, mad props to vite!

*looks out for an internal or will try to get the dvdr*

//spoo

If it was ac3, it's would be a nuke!

Posted by Darkness on 01-09-2003 02:41 PM:

Yea 135 kbps mp3 ?? sigh..

AC3 would have been great... oh well, still happy with the SVCD..

Posted by traumatek on 01-09-2003 03:10 PM:

out of interest,
whats the problem with 135 kbps mp3?
its vbr and it should be fine shouldn't it?

cheers Vite, look forward to checking this out....

Posted by perra_himself on 01-09-2003 03:13 PM:

expected

unexpecting =)))

Posted by Ricc81 on 01-09-2003 03:49 PM:

How can anyone be saticfied with a release of a 3h film
on ONLY 2 CD:s??

It's a pity that ViTE can't get that a film of these proportions
should be at least on 2 CD:s.

If you have it only 2, you get bad vid + bad sound.

Posted by SSirhc on 01-09-2003 03:56 PM:

sample looks nice
a inytiny bit pixelation but what the hell
nice one ViTE
9/9/10

Posted by crob on 01-09-2003 04:09 PM:

quote:
It's a pity that ViTE can't get that a film of these proportions
should be at least on 2 CD:s.

It is on 2 CD's you muppet.

Secondly, this is an Xvid release = Quality Compression.

Posted by sp00ky on 01-09-2003 04:35 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by crob
It is on 2 CD's you muppet.

well, i guess it was just a typo of Ricc's

quote:
Originally posted by CobyDK
If it was ac3, it's would be a nuke!

well, ac3 is no nuke reason.. 3 cd may be a nuke reason :P (tho there are no rules for it imo)
but i remember how dvl solved it one year ago: a 2 cd mp3 release and an 3 cd ac3 internal

//spoo

Posted by perra_himself on 01-09-2003 04:37 PM:

well what´s wrong wih AC3? =)))

Posted by sp00ky on 01-09-2003 04:52 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by perra_himself
well what´s wrong wih AC3? =)))

with ac3 instead of mp3 and keeping this release at 2 cds it would have a video bitrate of about 657 (instead of 970 now) kbps and that would look... let's just say BAD

thus, as i said, if it was 3 cd, some rule-junkies would nuke it tho...

//spoo

Posted by vorbis on 01-09-2003 05:15 PM:

this is also divx. One of its main benefits is less space. 3 cds would be nearly as much as svcd!! Mp3 sound is pretty decent imo.

Posted by SpeedStar on 01-09-2003 05:53 PM:

Sorry, but Lord of the Rings with stereo sound is like watching it on a black and white TV. Ok, bad compare but if the P-DVD included an Dolby 5.1 Track please release it.
I think everyone who watched Fellowship of the Ring with an 5.1 System will agree!
I personally will not touch it till I got an ac3 track even if I have to wait for the retail DVD.

Posted by martienfou on 01-09-2003 06:50 PM:

its a dvd-scr not a p-dvd.. dont confuse.

vite did things by the rules.

only problem is sound is desynch in that one

its gotta be nuked probably.

Posted by PryXX on 01-09-2003 06:53 PM:

And it's nuked!
Audio out of sync, what a shame..

Posted by Jugalator on 01-09-2003 06:58 PM:

Nuked on nforce since it was apparently out of sync.

Oh well... I'll keep on waiting for a proper divx/xvid then.

Posted by napalmfuzz on 01-09-2003 07:00 PM:

well.. i dont care what kbps the sound is.. fact is vite beat TDi's ass.. the sound is SOOOOOO much better on this divx then on their svcd... and anyone that knows me.. knows it pains me to say that

__________________

"Nothing says OBEY ME like a severed head on a fence post,"

Posted by TEKiero on 01-09-2003 07:20 PM:

hey,

why does it say on nforce: out of sync?

Posted by nfe++ on 01-09-2003 07:50 PM:

is it badly out of sync ?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:39 PM.

Pages (5): [1] 2 3 4 5 »
Show all 100 posts from this thread on one page