VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 30 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Grind *SVCD* *Dupe* - TELESYNC - Centropy (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=27019)


Posted by vcdkrew on 08-30-2003 03:43 AM:

why, why would they release something that is old? oh well, not trying to sound annoying, this is still a good release.

8/8/6

-ryan


Posted by neomatrix on 08-30-2003 04:06 AM:

wow CTP's back , looks better than the other release but not so much so that it would deserve a proper; the audio I got from the sample was skippy im not sure if thats a problem throughout the discs or if thats just my sample
7/6/??


Posted by NightKid49 on 08-30-2003 04:22 AM:

video looks a bit better than the other release, nice job.

8/7/4


Posted by UltrA1 on 08-30-2003 04:56 AM:

well sample is clearer and sound is beter than others.
7x audio
7x video
7.5 x movie


Posted by neofilms on 08-30-2003 05:04 AM:

7/6/4


Posted by aTTicA on 08-30-2003 05:43 AM:

all i got to say someth1ng.. is... suckit, maybe it needed a proper maybe i didnt, all these SVCD rules can suck on my...well n/m. anyways, how can u say this is typical good ctp quality, following they didnt need to proper this, any ctp rls ive seen is conciderably better than any logistic rls, dont get me wrong, props to logistic for the effort, and all the groups that dont flame each other for tha matter. but how can u have a set of rules for something like this. Is there a right way to rob a bank? apart from the dont get caught part? how does ctp get nuked for gay stuff liek this, and open range is missing parts of the movie and doesnt get nuked??? imostly stick to dvdrips, but as far as im concerned, any rip is a good rip, well most of em.. maybe ums should give up . personally i dont care if a group uses th same source as another group.. if they can make a noticeable improvment..better is better, any way u look at it.. if if ur happy withthe old one.. then dont bother with this, but it is better, and i think anyone on the scen will tell u nobody matches ctp's quality when it comes to TS, not consistantly at least, a few groups have been known to pop out 1 GREAT rip and alot of better than average TS, but ctp quality is and has been reliable for years, im not sayin they put in more effort, or they deserve more respect than other groups.. props to them all, just dont flame them for something gay.

oh yeah 7/8/?


Posted by PhAnToMs on 08-30-2003 06:31 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by someth1ng
Nice pre....of a movie that came out over 2 weeks ago....that sucks bigtime...with NO real good reason to proper, other than the fact ctp thinks they are better than all.....umm, did they happen to notice that other grps know how to rls shit just as good and a shitload faster? Lamers....overall good quality though, bit bright, but seems to be normal ctp type shit quality wise. Next time internal boys, have some respect for fellow rls crews.


took words outta my mouth your the man

...well i dunno if u were ever gone but well welcome back to releasing movies that have fine releases already

#2 on shittiest movie of the year list 1 kelly and..... 3 gigli

well quality tipical

8.8.1

dupe? good call admins most there ts's anymore are basically dupes anyway

no proper reason? waste of time and bandwidth

__________________
Jesus fucking christ my sig was huge so Dwaggy replaced it with this message


Posted by Butch on 08-30-2003 07:54 AM:

*From Sample*

Erm Ctp recently released several other films just not SVCD ts's.If people could operate the mouse and click 'SVCD' or 'dvdr' then they'd know.Welcome "back" CTP, not your usual quality and certainly not chosen the best film to come back on.But i think we're all waiting on something in the next few days so lets just all keep our mouth's shut and prey.
6/6/2

__________________


Posted by pezley on 08-30-2003 09:33 AM:

looks like a uber crap movie ..... but the quality is very nice ... alot better than their bb2 and tomb raider.....

bit over exposed on the light scenes ...

sounds is great .. not a problem

8/9/ ?? no doubt a 1


Posted by BestBoot on 08-30-2003 09:42 AM:

7/6/5 1 reason i downloaded thiz movie tom green


Posted by magik2k3 on 08-30-2003 11:07 AM:

Here we go again..........

Early Saturday morning here and I thought I'll take a look see at whats happening at VCD Q.Same shit different day.Not seen the sample,not even interested in the film at all,but the comments!now that's a whole different story,it's like Centropy are the Demons of the scene and most people fear and loath them for one reason or another.I've said this before,but why the hell do the majority of people who post here think they are better than the groups? Do we see you gettin your ass to the Cinemas and releasing anything,I think not.I have seen people who have said the quality of a release looks shit from the sample,but hey,they download the full discs"just to be sure" then come back n bitch some more about it!why?
I read the CTP nfo for this release,and I couldn't find the bit that says"Centropy are better than everyone else"as suggested by a couple of people here.I don't think for 1 minute that CTP are the best group around,but the majority of their releases are great compared to a lot of the others,I judge a film by watchabilty,if I can sit n watch it then it's good,if I can't it's crap,it's that simple for me,I don't feel I have to come here and start bitching on and on and on and on and...wait! that's it,gawd I just clicked,most of you bitching are bitches,Chicks With Dicks perhaps?shoulders with chips? I think we should give the bitches the equipment to go and make their own shit,give em a name,CWD sounds good,and let the fun begin.

And another thing,I recently had a holiday,perhaps the CTP guys(or girls) did the same?
But how dare they take time out to have a life when CWD are waiting to bitch about em?
I think the majority of people here need to be able to judge a release on it's own merits and NOT by which group released it,because it does seem to me that the case is"Centropy release,Gotta flame em"no matter how good or bad the quality is.

Btw,I thought the CTP release of BB2 was shite,couldn't watch it,the same goes for Tomb Raider 2.So I took my wife and we went n sat in the cinema and watched em,well I did,she just sat there moaning on and on about how uncomfortable the seats were,"what's that little flicker about,Why does the sound keep doing that"etc etc etc.
I can see why CWD wouldn't be able to go to the cinema to watch these things,they would probably miss most of the films because they were in turmoil about which toilets they had to use.


Posted by Klonin on 08-30-2003 02:58 PM:

Sound

by far alot better than the Logistic release. The hissing sucked ass.

Video - no improvement - cropped less
Audio - Alot improvement
Flix - Still sucked


Posted by Mouth_Full21 on 08-30-2003 03:48 PM:

LOVELY!!! This rls is very nice, sample is clear, abit bright, and the sound is impecable. Good job ctp. Don't b bothered by the shit u get this rls was needed, Other rls wasn't even close to as nice. Props once again guys!!!


Posted by Stoned24x7 on 08-30-2003 04:35 PM:

Nice release Ctp but why oh why release a movie this shit--- Pic is abit better than Logistics rip and sound is way better! Film sucked ass though! i thought it was supposed to be a comedy, whoever wrote this shit needs to sit down have a smoke and quit their movie scripting job! My local cinema is lucky i didnt pay to watch this shit at their place or i would of burnt the fucker down for RIPPING me off.

8.0/7.5/4


Posted by villanovax on 08-30-2003 07:58 PM:

Ok, I watched the 1st disc of the logistic release, it was ok, but then I had the free time, so I decided to compare it to the ctp release, now, while if you just wanted to see the movie once and got logistic, stick with it, but if you really like the movie (for whatever reason....) then this is worthy of the download (if it's not nuked everywhere)


Posted by 404notfound on 08-30-2003 08:32 PM:

Re: Here we go again..........

quote:
Originally posted by magik2k3

Btw,I thought the CTP release of BB2 was shite,couldn't watch it,the same goes for Tomb Raider 2.



You must have been watching a different version of TR2 than me cos my Centropy version was mint!!

404

__________________


Posted by acme420 on 08-30-2003 08:46 PM:

Re: Re: Here we go again..........

quote:
Originally posted by 404notfound
You must have been watching a different version of TR2 than me cos my Centropy version was mint!!

404



I dont know what version he was watching either. the Centropy version i got Came on 3 CD's and it was excellent with the exception of the colors washing a little in the really bright scenes. im sure if you go and look at the thread for CTP's BB2 you will see my post and many more like it saying the release was great.

__________________
eat me balls!!


Posted by bryehn on 08-30-2003 09:04 PM:

CTP's TR2 was fantastic, actually...

i don't know why people are saying "come back", for christ's sake, it hasn't even been a month since their last TS...

anyways...this movie sucked ass, this release is decent, but way late, and completely uneeded. should be nuked.

8/8/1

can't wait to see CTP's jeepers creepers 2, or swat, or FVSJ sometime in late november :P

__________________
Am I the only one missing the .rar file from the repack?


Posted by JiggaLigga on 08-30-2003 09:25 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by bryehn
can't wait to see CTP's jeepers creepers 2, or swat, or FVSJ sometime in late november :P


Umm , the best you're going to get of FVSJ is the videocd TS release, which is internal.


Posted by magik2k3 on 08-30-2003 09:53 PM:

Re: Re: Here we go again..........

quote:
Originally posted by 404notfound
You must have been watching a different version of TR2 than me cos my Centropy version was mint!!

404


Hmm,maybe I dloaded somebody elses release that had been repacked as the ctp version? I think not.And perhaps describing them as "shite" was a bit strong? But..............In the end m8,it's all down to personal opinion-I found the pic on that release bad,shit loads of flaring on the bright scenes.I didn't come here and start bitching about it though,I paid some dosh and saw the thing in the (un)comfort of a local cinema,guess what? No flaring,but then I thought the film itself sucked,once again Personal Opinion.For the most part Ctp releases are very good,but the occasional bad rls finds it's to us.
And the statement made in your post is YOUR personal opinion.
nuff said?


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:44 PM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 30 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.