VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones *RECODE* *iNTERNAL* - TELESYNC - XPD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=3202)

i knew it!!!!!

i hope they release this internal!
i have been waiting for this one!!

looks nice xpd

Good Job XPD

argg

i'm sick of these damn re-encodes that are only internal! I want this rls so bad, much like I did the Spiderman rls. I couldn't ever find that one, but Star Wars is my #1 thing so hopefully it'll be somewhere...

the force is with xpd...

well do ur own rencode man. its easy. i jus want their settings so i can do it exactly like they did. cuz im tryin to re-encode spiderman but the picture isnt that good as vcd. :-( i want nice settings so i dont lose quality. fuck 3 cds is what i say

yeah I hear you. I just want to save myself some effort and just download the damn thing. I re-encoded the SeVcD version of this for fun, so I know how, its just a matter of how lazy i am!

i think this is better than the SVCD. thats just what i think, simply because of color fixes and AR fix

movie sucked ass.

you die....you die and burn!

with me its not whether i am too lazy to do it but more that i cannot. i have an old box [200 mhz - 64 mb ram] so re-encoding this would take me forever. since i watch it on my standalone dvd player that doesnt play these xvcd svcds that centropy seems to keep putting out.. i have a problem. they arent normal svcds are they? i have a few other svcds non-centropy and they work fine. odd. anyway i appreciate these re-encodes as i am unable to do them myself. hope to find this some where. thanks for taking your time to release it xpd.

-crusader

umm ur not gonna get the same quality with vcd format.. i did re encode it svcd-svcd takes about 10 hours for me.. svcd-vcd takes about 2 hours,,, and shrinks the files almost inhalf..the quality is a little less.. but itll fit on 2 cds.. and play in all vcd players. its not that hard kids really

no one said it was hard...we just don't, or literally are not able to do it. I'm too lazy to merge mpgs, cut, edit, correct, etc. I rather just grab XPD's kickin' rls and be happy with it

theres no way fixing the blockiness other than blurring the vcd. and thats lame.

quote:

---

Originally posted by crusader
these xvcd svcds that centropy seems to keep putting out..

---

Yea. I agree with MovieBootLegger. If we could just have the settings that they used, a lot of us could do this ourselves.

Anyone know this information or any suggestions on what they might have done?

__________________
"I smell varmint poontang." - Bill Murray

Eh?

i don't know if its my imagination but this is the same as the other version? i downloaded the Sample and it seemed compressed (picture looked squashed) when i finally got the whole thing it was fine in normal 16:3 now this version is released? what the difference between this and the other most recent verison?

some of the specs are on the nfo.....

6 releases...

Damn. Whats it up to? 6 god damn releases of the same bad movie! The only thing good about Star Wars Episode 2 was special effects, which are just taken away from these releases!



PS: Will you damn admins goto vbulletin.com and get some hacks for this board? I really like the one that allows you to have a quick response, rather than having to push the Replay button to reply. New Smilies would be nice too.

Well

Well i flamed xpd earlier but i have to take it back.

I now understand why you did the release, You did the release for people using PAL.

I just checked by ctp release and it is bad aspect in pal but very good in ntsc mode after dvd player conversion.

So i might fix cd3 if the errors are too bad since it is a fast job.

Sorry for flaming you

cadillact

To vorbis !!!

if i take a dvd from both pal and ntsc and put them next to each other you wouldnt see any difference between the tv that plays pal and the tv that plays ntsc.
At least i dont see a difference but who cares soon it will only be high def tv here in usa so pal can get lost since you cant compare pal to high def TV.

just my 2 cents. I have lived with pal for 20 years and ntsc for 5 and its same same but different.

why on earth should they recode to NTSC

in case you don't know, PAL is a worldwide recognised format. Nobody has to use NTSC. PAL is also supposed to be superior. Anyway the point is they can do what they like.

i can recode this thing myself....