VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 25 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Mean Girls - SCREENER - Wastedtime (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=42487)


Posted by jeex on 07-04-2004 05:02 AM:

the VideoCD release was good enough.. wait for the DVDRetail.

lindsey lohan is a hot piece of ass.

and if this group does in fact come from the future why dont they just release the retail DVDR of this (and every) movie instead of this screener bullshit?


thats a joke just incase you're as stupid as jurai and didnt get it.


Posted by vip3r on 07-04-2004 05:10 AM:

I'm gonna have to agree and say stick with the VideoCD telesync of this...but if you didn't have time to get that one, get this (unless ya can wait about 1-2 months till retail)..the pic is very blurry & it the sound is kinda crappy..movie was good though

7/7/7


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 07-04-2004 07:17 AM:

blah strike 2...what happened wastedtime..you guys were doing good before. blurry ass pic..kind of like the screener release of Johnson family videocd. This is super aching on the eyes. keep videocd's telesync much better and widescreen..lol..

7/6/8 movie was real good.

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by djj on 07-04-2004 08:48 AM:

Video is a tad blurry but for audio I don't have any complaints, it's okay. Movie was ok too.

7/8/7

__________________


Posted by stezo2k on 07-04-2004 10:12 AM:

Picture is decent for a screener, but it is a bit blury

Sound is ok, but for a screener, it should of been better

Movie was ok i guess, not really my type of movie

6/5/6

as for the rip, stay with the videocd rip, it's much better quality


Posted by JaX on 07-04-2004 11:23 AM:

Typical VHS screener. . . . . . . colours seemed a little too bright in places, and washed out in others. Slight blurryness throughout the most of it. Stick with VideoCD release unless you really do wanna wait for the DVDr/DVDrip . . .

6
7
5? Movie sucked assed!


Posted by horizonstar on 07-04-2004 12:55 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by BLUE-NEO
blah strike 2...what happened wastedtime..you guys were doing good before. blurry ass pic..

Hmm ... I've always been under the impression that low-quality VHS screeners are more the tape's fault than the group's. But who knows ...

__________________


Scrobble all you want, we'll make more!


Posted by Redemption1980 on 07-04-2004 02:04 PM:

This isn't that Bad, it does look rather blurry and the sound isn't perfect, but its watchable.

Movie looks quite good too for a chick flick

7/7/?


Posted by Debo on 07-04-2004 03:36 PM:

it doesnt look as good as the first few wastedtime releases
but i cant complain
movie was alright
7/7/5

__________________


Posted by Pickles on 07-04-2004 04:23 PM:

Mean.Girls.SCREENER-Wastedtime is a waste of time. Can't expect much from a VHS Screener though. If you have the VideoCD keep it.


Posted by djarum on 07-04-2004 08:43 PM:

Just your average VHS screener. Decent video and sound, nothing special with this. If you already have the Telesync keep it and wait til Retail, if you havn't seen it yet, grab this.


Posted by xboxfanz on 07-04-2004 10:26 PM:

7/7/7 Wastedtime. Keep rocking the vcd scene. Love the screeners


Posted by Joppo on 07-05-2004 03:53 PM:

7.5/7.5/6

Nice quality, but I disagree with ppl saying the TS was better


Posted by fuzzywuzzy1 on 07-05-2004 06:56 PM:

would say this was as good as videocd release in quality better in the fact that the end did not stop halfway through a sentence and we got some of the credits to show movie had ended


Posted by dark101 on 07-05-2004 07:06 PM:

This movie isn't half bad, and anyway if u don't like it it's fun to just watch hot chicks fite.
My ratin
7
7
9

__________________
__________________________

Fuk off biatch this is my turf!
__________________________


Posted by MTV on 07-05-2004 09:27 PM:

Oki. this is better than the VideoCD rls. also i got to say why is spiderman 2 been marked up so high ? yea its a good t/s , but this is a better copy & its screener,not cropped no clock/counter etc.some times the marks put ppl off d,loading the film.so if your unsure grab the sample 1st and you will see its good quality.how ppl can mark this as a 6 or 7 is just stupid .

8.5/ 8 /7


Posted by XeroFightsAlone on 07-05-2004 09:38 PM:

Forgive me for being out of the loop, but are these guys TCF?

__________________
soda box


Posted by Jonas on 07-05-2004 10:52 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by MTV
Oki. this is better than the VideoCD rls. also i got to say why is spiderman 2 been marked up so high ? yea its a good t/s , but this is a better copy & its screener,not cropped no clock/counter etc.some times the marks put ppl off d,loading the film.so if your unsure grab the sample 1st and you will see its good quality.how ppl can mark this as a 6 or 7 is just stupid .

8.5/ 8 /7




ts's are rated versus other ts
cam versus cam
dvdrip versus dvdrip

I'm sure you see where this is going. I hope this clears the rating system up for you

Quality on this Screener is similar to Wastedtimes release of Dawn of the Dead

7/7/7


Posted by SleepysHell on 07-06-2004 03:25 PM:

nice quality
movie sucked

8/8/2

2 for the hot chicks in it


Posted by KLashNekkOff on 07-06-2004 08:41 PM:

a nice screener, deserves more than the 6's and 7's its been recieving and is most definately not a waste of time!

video - lovely colours, not cropped either which is a bonus, there is that slight blur too it but this is hardly worth marking it down by a lot.

audio - clear and audible, no real problems

movie - sorry really couldnt get into it, deleted at 15minutes in

8/8/4

__________________


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:44 PM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 25 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.