VCDQuality Forums Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
Show all 43 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Open Water *SVCD* - DVD SCR - NOX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=47374)


Posted by wazzers on 09-28-2004 11:57 PM:

Nice quality dvd cscr usual b+w intervals and protery of blah blah

8/8/4-sucked badly


Posted by Scorch on 09-29-2004 12:15 AM:

What a quick release.. though this looks like it might be a mislabeled TC?

EDIT: Nevermind, must just be a bad sample jpeg.. the divx release looks great


Posted by diekund on 09-29-2004 12:16 AM:

jeeesus this video looks terrible, not NOX's or DvP's fault, but the fault of the film makers. the audio sounds like its taken from a cam source at a cinema. they only had $120,000 spent on this movie hence its shitness, but jeesus thats bad. props to you NOX
rip is perfect tho, just the source sucks


Posted by jmur on 09-29-2004 12:31 AM:

about time this was put on vcdq, lol. anywho. vid isnt that great. it looks like its out of focus or something, still completely watchable. as far as rhe sound goes, its perfect. there are b&w scenes, and property of lions gate watermarks. im not gonna bother with this, but its a good release if u havent seen it yet,

7/9/5


Posted by Redemption1980 on 09-29-2004 12:57 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Scorch
What a quick release.. though this looks like it might be a mislabeled TC?

EDIT: Nevermind, must just be a bad sample jpeg.. the divx release looks great



Why are you rating the jpegs, jpegs tell you very little, if they did then people would all get the DIVX version, when this one looks a bit better.

I like the release and i like the film, low budget and all.

8/9/8


Posted by vip3r on 09-29-2004 01:00 AM:

not bad .. NOX could've encoded it a lot better i think. Movie wasn't bad, i'll wait till retail though. Good job on this super quick release guys. Seems like it's " DVD-SCR Season "

7/8.5/7


Posted by liteflihi on 09-29-2004 03:06 AM:

Is it me or is the divx version choppy? Looks like about 18 FPS. Sound was fine.


Posted by Rico on 09-29-2004 03:14 AM:

Great job from NOX... I don't think that anyone could ask for anything more. Copy looked great to me on the bigscreen, crisp sound, low-budget movie but fun to watch.

9/9/5


Posted by HcC on 09-29-2004 05:19 AM:

CRAP

"not bad .. NOX could've encoded it a lot better i think"

you think wrong. I saw this shit film in the theatre unfortunately. It looked like it was filmed on a 200 dollar cam from a flea market. ***SPOILERS REMOVED*** DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME ON THIS @$@%#

seriously, dvd screener? why screen this, I could film it with a wetsuit and a blonde chick and make it more interesting, hell i've seen porn with the same props thats better.

video 9 - perfect compared to original, 1 off for water marks

audio 10 - perfect compared to original

movie 0 - seriously someone shoot me i'm starting to remember it

__________________
--==HcC==--


Posted by sloth1234 on 09-29-2004 05:33 AM:

Re: CRAP

quote:
Originally posted by HcC
"not bad .. NOX could've encoded it a lot better i think"

you think wrong. I saw this shit film in the theatre unfortunately. It looked like it was filmed on a 200 dollar cam from a flea market. ***SPOILERS REMOVED*** DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME ON THIS @$@%#

seriously, dvd screener? why screen this, I could film it with a wetsuit and a blonde chick and make it more interesting, hell i've seen porn with the same props thats better.

video 9 - perfect compared to original, 1 off for water marks

audio 10 - perfect compared to original

movie 0 - seriously someone shoot me i'm starting to remember it



you sir are a F*cking moron, ok the film was low budget and could have been more interesting to some people..but honestly shut the hell up, you don't go and tell the outcome of a movie in a public forum for people who might actually want to watch it. I myself have heard mixed reviews about the movie but still might watch it that doesn't mean I wanna know what happens in it asshole...damn..
some people should just keep their opinions to themselves..
anyways..9.5 for video... - .5 for watermarks because they are kind of annoying and 10 for audio..


Posted by aWe on 09-29-2004 05:53 AM:

SORRY... Posting on the release only... not other peoples flaming posts:

release: everything about it was FINE. watchable and no problems, couldnt have expected more from a low budget film.

8.7/8-9/5.3 - bleh watermarks dont matter -- this movie is mostly water anyways = Þ

just another low budget film that made its way to the box office.

__________________

IRC://IRC.EFNET.NET/VCDQUALITY
IRC://IRC.EFNET.NET/prolifeabortionists
"@Dwaggy · pirates are hella kinky
Avenue_1 · how do u know this?
@Dwaggy · i'm a pirate"


Posted by MTV on 09-29-2004 07:38 AM:

I hate to say xvid - but if you want this film get the xvid. its loads better quality than this rip.dont know wot the hell they did to it but the dvp rip is 99% perfect.i got both samples before d,loading the dvp copy & glad i did.

7 / 9 / 6


Posted by MaKEshiFT on 09-29-2004 07:47 AM:

Originally posted by HcC
CRAP
"not bad .. NOX could've encoded it a lot better i think"

you think wrong. I saw this shit film in the theatre unfortunately. It looked like it was filmed on a 200 dollar cam from a flea market. Not only that, its about ***SPOILERS REMOVED*** DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME ON THIS @$@%#

seriously, dvd screener? why screen this, I could film it with a wetsuit and a blonde chick and make it more interesting, hell i've seen porn with the same props thats better.

I FULLY AGREE WITH SLOTH1234!!!
MAN WTF IS YOUR DAMN PROBLEM!! On half of EVERY one that WAS Actually planning on watching this.. YOU are a complete ASSHOLE for telling the Ending on a PUBLIC Forum!! I mean we are so thankfull for idiots as your self ..and blessed by your complete lack of respect for others by doing so, and yet utterly amazed by your complete idiocy at the same time!
Yes this may not be the best movie. but it is just that..
"A MOVIE!!" ,, so the next time you attempt to GRACE US with your supreme intelect.. realize one thing.. YOU DON'T HAVE ANY! Ruining the movie for anyone//.. as you did me and i imagine a few others, is a Complete idiot thing to do..
8.7/ 9 / 8 (if you take the movie for what it is.. a LOW Budget movie)

[EDIT:: Nice flame, but I removed the spoilers and you bastards keep re-posting em!! - Neversoft]


Posted by t8yman on 09-29-2004 08:26 AM:

Re: CRAP

quote:
Originally posted by HcC
"not bad .. NOX could've encoded it a lot better i think"

you think wrong. I saw this shit film in the theatre unfortunately. It looked like it was filmed on a 200 dollar cam from a flea market. ***SPOILERS REMOVED*** DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME ON THIS @$@%#

seriously, dvd screener? why screen this, I could film it with a wetsuit and a blonde chick and make it more interesting, hell i've seen porn with the same props thats better.

video 9 - perfect compared to original, 1 off for water marks

audio 10 - perfect compared to original

movie 0 - seriously someone shoot me i'm starting to remember it




CUNT

I have yet to watch this, my mife really wants to watch it, and now I know the ending, and therefore dont want to watch it now.. Why don't you fuck off and die, I'm surprised they let you into the theatre to see this, isn't it a 15 certificate or something?

9/9/ who fuckin cares now anyway.

YOU FUCKING WANKER


Posted by Debo on 09-29-2004 08:55 AM:

ill grab this
7/8/1


omfg i coudnt beleive this movie
pure shit

__________________


Posted by VonRashniek on 09-29-2004 09:04 AM:

Re: Re: CRAP

quote:
Originally posted by sloth1234
you sir are a F*cking moron, ok the film was low budget and could have been more interesting to some people..but honestly shut the hell up, you don't go and tell the outcome of a movie in a public forum for people who might actually want to watch it. I myself have heard mixed reviews about the movie but still might watch it that doesn't mean I wanna know what happens in it asshole...damn..
some people should just keep their opinions to themselves..
anyways..9.5 for video... - .5 for watermarks because they are kind of annoying and 10 for audio..



Agreed, heh I waited for a good release to watch this, now why bother, I know how it ends, what a jacka$$.

__________________
Opinions are like azzholes, everyones got one, and yours stinks.


Posted by ephid0r on 09-29-2004 12:00 PM:

8/8/0

was worse than the release I watched a few weeks back, for some sick reason I wanted to see if the sea wasnt pixelated to fuck this time


Posted by nozafc on 09-29-2004 02:12 PM:

from sample :

8/10/??

not seen movie yet, have heard mixed reviews


Posted by 404notfound on 09-29-2004 02:54 PM:

The next person to slag off another user i will punch them in THE FUCKING THROAT!

You all can't be that STUPID to have forgotten the rules i posted over and OVER and OVER a while back? What am i saying. Of course you all are!

If somebody does something you don't like REPORT THEM TO A FUCKING MOD AND IT WILL BE DEALT WITH! Turn the forum into a flame war and you are out. I don't care if you have 1 post or 1000.

404

__________________


Posted by iNz0 on 09-29-2004 04:29 PM:

I just saw the xvid version last night, which was in my opinion a perfect rip , as for the movie, it is truly a great movie.most ppl are just to narrow minded to see that.

PS : i am never going near the ocean again


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:07 AM. Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »
Show all 43 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.