VCDQuality Forums - Son Of The Mask *SVCD* - TELECINE

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 24 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Son Of The Mask *SVCD* - TELECINE - NOX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=60476)

Posted by MR.FLIX-IT on 03-20-2005 04:35 PM:

R u serious?> This as a TC lol
Way too much cropping on left hand side cuts out pic and whats with the purple line down left side??? guess its u'r watermark lol
anyway sound is great but pic also shimmies and shakes throughout.hopefully someone will proper or u guys repack bcuz as a tc i give this a 6. 9 for sound good try

Posted by galekyja on 03-20-2005 04:40 PM:

okayyyyyyyyy, there is not much to say to this "TC"...

in my eyes it looks like a shitty TS converted from VCD to SVCD, not unwatchable, but i would even not watch this version

from sample:

v 4 (try harder NOX, like as TUN (they rule))
a 8
m ?

Posted by lozman on 03-20-2005 04:44 PM:

the worst TC ive seen pic blurry sound good

4/8/6

Posted by proto on 03-20-2005 04:46 PM:

from sample; not the best telecine in the world...a bit blury - sound is fine.

6/8/?

__________________
proto

Posted by immun3 on 03-20-2005 04:54 PM:

Based on viewing the sample:-

Video - looks pretty blurry, is not up to the exceptional standards of TUN's recent Telecine work.........(o how we have been spolied!) Was also dark from what i saw in the sample, but the pixellation is the main issue here.

Audio - no problems as of yet. Loud and clear.

Movie - no thankyou, not touching this one with a barge pole.

6/9/* - voted as a Telecine.

Posted by Furius on 03-20-2005 05:01 PM:

From sample: 5/8/?

As has been said, pic isn't the best, but audio is fine.
Think I'll pass going on the IMDB rating anyway

Posted by nakid on 03-20-2005 05:04 PM:

if TC means Terrible Copy, then their right on the mark... Stick with the other TS 80% better video wise.. not some of NOX best work but i've seen worse..

v - 4.1
a - 8.5
m - 5 okay move

Posted by galekyja on 03-20-2005 05:07 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by nakid
if TC means Terrible Copy, then their right on the mark...

looooooooooooool n1 joke dude

Posted by XAVeRY on 03-20-2005 05:25 PM:

should get nuked for reason

code:
mislabeled.disaster.not.telecine

__________________
()h |\/|y 60d! 7h3y'v3 |-|4x0r3d 4nd Phr34k3d |\/|y (0mpu73r!

Posted by jacksont123 on 03-20-2005 05:45 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by XAVeRY
should get nuked for reason
code:
mislabeled.disaster.not.telecine

i have to agree with XAVeRY on that
one of the worst "so-called telecine" i've ever seen

Posted by bigswim on 03-20-2005 06:00 PM:

Nuked

NUKED - crap.quality.TC.is.WS.utter.shit

oh well...

Posted by stezo2k on 03-20-2005 06:32 PM:

definatley not a telecine either that or a pretty bad encode, quality is good but definatley not up to typical telecene quality, i'd say this is a mislabled TS

video 6 (would be 7 if it was labelled as a TS)

sound 9 no problems here

movie 2 hated it

Posted by lindoors on 03-20-2005 07:31 PM:

bollocks quality and crap sound

Posted by creativenonsens on 03-20-2005 08:00 PM:

NOX- you have got to be kidding me. If any [NOX] members reads this.. if you guys want to be a respectable movie group.. put out respectable movies. I'm suprised you have members that would waste their time telecining this garbage. This is one of the worst movies to hit the box office the last few years. I wouldn't take my time to look at the movie poster let alone rls this shit.

I even wasted my time DLing the sample just so I could post my thoughts:

4/5/0

Posted by Engie*Benjy on 03-20-2005 08:13 PM:

NOX gave it a crack... but i think the video of the TC just isnt what you would expect, its blurry and reminds me more of a poor screener, the sound however is decent

i would say video 5, audio 7, still watchable tho imo

__________________

Posted by rascallion on 03-20-2005 08:15 PM:

For a TC this is rather weak, the picture is blurred. the sound is fine but from the sample this is to be avoided

From the sample
V:4
A:8
M:?

Posted by TheWebJunkie on 03-20-2005 09:00 PM:

Not one of the best tc i have seen

Audio: 8
Video: 5
movie: 7

Id stick with the TS repack by MOViE if i was you

__________________
Visit Babe-forum and help the community grow!!
Register today for free!

Surf the net anonymous, bypass college & work firewalls

Posted by Muzak on 03-20-2005 09:05 PM:

this is pure garbage. making a "TC" of a movie this bad, and im usually a pretty easy guy to entertain, will end a groups "career", lol. its like they tried to take a regular cam and shine the movie right into the lense, lol. i mean, damn...

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by pHo
ok, well in future when you join a community that is very anti-sellers, you really should choose a username that isn't going to cause confusion and annoyance. its like joinin an arabic forum with the name BUSHRULES because you like the australian outback.

Posted by bcool2k on 03-20-2005 09:31 PM:

Son.Of.The.Mask.TC.SVCD-NOX
NUKED: crap.quality.TC.is.WS.utter.shit

Not what a Telecine should look like damn grainy and blurry. Thumbs down NOX.

NUFF SAID.

Posted by BLUE-NEO on 03-20-2005 11:26 PM:

haha tc my azz. no way....I've never seen one this terrible...even the day after tomorrow version from tun wasn't this bad with bad encoding...

this looks like a mislabeled telesync.

4/7/7 I actually like this movie...it wasn't better than the original, but wasn't terrible either.

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:56 PM.

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 24 posts from this thread on one page