VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Legend of Zorro *SVCD* - TELECINE - PRODiGY (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=66974)


Posted by X69 on 10-30-2005 09:24 PM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

6 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

7 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

8 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by tombraider on 10-30-2005 09:36 PM:

a bit of a buzz right speaker overall not bad 8 out of 10 for me


Posted by tininho on 10-30-2005 09:40 PM:

What's up with nfo?


Posted by Seduxen on 10-30-2005 09:42 PM:

Another mislabeled.TS


Posted by Bullet on 10-30-2005 09:48 PM:

nuked for being a mislabeled ts

i watched the whole movie. comment:

audio: fine by me. direct audio and it's ok

video:...on my pc i saw some real flickering,..but on my tv it was fine. Sometimes the video isnt really sharp. But it has enough color and framing. For me this is watchable after tuning my tv

7/7/8

__________________


Posted by Airhead2 on 10-30-2005 09:51 PM:

another mislabled release by the retards at PRODiGY. Even for a TS this looks like crap.

Overcropped squished picture, grainy and flickering. Also something is wrong with the picture looks like a 9th gen VHS Screener not a TC. Tons of wavy lines in the footage. Sound has a buzz/hum to it in the background.

PRODiGY was retards when they were around 1 year ago .. not much has changed.

As a TC:
4/6/*


Posted by Arsenal_2005 on 10-30-2005 10:13 PM:

WHY WHY WHY? another misslabled release, if this is a "Telecine" they must be using some messed up machine lol.

on my desktop the pics looks wavy and you can see the lines going across the screen, the audio is directs but does need filtering cos it has a bad hum to it it most parts.

V - 4 as TC / 6 as TS
A - 6
M - dont look my kinda film

Be honest when naming a release, dont make yourself look silly, people will respect you if you rlease things that are labeled what they are.

dare to see what a re-encode of this will look like ut im sure some group is sitting there now working on something, maybe something good can be done but as its a bad source i doubt it.

Thanks for the release.


Posted by infinityfsp2002 on 10-30-2005 10:23 PM:

The Nfo is quite funny, they talk about how its problems with the source, making it obvious its not their source. Then they say only certain groups can use their source, despite it obviously not being homemade.

Obviously not a TC, but since its labelled as one ill rate it like one - 4/5/x

__________________
iNFiNiTY


Posted by HoHoHoDeadGiant on 10-30-2005 10:55 PM:

:: flaming is awesome and not against the rules AT ALL

Ok u can ban me now

:: Yes, both of your accounts -D


Posted by freezedry on 10-30-2005 11:32 PM:

zorro

well for one guys read the info fully this is the info for doom that they released not zorro unless zorro is based on a pc game and is from outerspace??!!!

I watched full release flickering on my lcd monitor no!!
a little blur yes at top and bottom
sound good

v-7
a-7
overall never liked zorro

come on guys watch the whole release before posting!


Posted by rattlesnake2002 on 10-30-2005 11:55 PM:

YEA nuked ts as usual not a good rls get better sources kthx


Posted by AlienDude on 10-31-2005 12:18 AM:

Not entirely their fault - russians mislabeled it as TC when russian version was released few days ago. Some russian confused silver with TC. PRODiGY didn't check video quality when adding english audio.

Video: 6
Audio: 5
Movie: 8


Posted by r1cola on 10-31-2005 02:30 AM:

bwahaha they just come right out and admit it sucks in the nfo and claim its a TC in the same paragraph.

oh well

5/7/2


Posted by CATBOX on 10-31-2005 03:10 AM:

Great idea guys.....lets all start calling the group that has been releasing some of the better quality releases lately retards. You guys can go stick with the CAMs then!

Video is pretty darn good. AR is very wide. The picture isn't scrunched, but the bars are very wide. There is a slight waviness to the video at some parts, but not through the entire film. Sound is good. It is bass heavy, but good. Best release so far by leaps and bounds.

7- good, but AR is wide, and wavy video
8-no problems here, but a little bass heavy
8- its just darn fun


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 10-31-2005 03:11 AM:

might be a real telecine...just a piss poor encode of one....no need for 3 disc at this level of quality.....

5/8/? sound is good, pic is sad...haven't watch completely..stopped on cd2..couldn't take anymore....grainy and flickering in center video is annoying...

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by 420Killa on 10-31-2005 03:21 AM:

This isn't a TC obviously but its the best out right now and i'll take it ... Nuked everywhere but i really don't care about the politics ill take whatever copy is better at the end of the day. 6/8/7 video has a flicker which is a bit annoying... movie wasn't as bad as i thought it might be, worth a watch

__________________
http://sliceoftheday.com/christina_aguilera/index.cfm?freepic=l3.jpg


Posted by Tom Keller on 10-31-2005 09:11 AM:

Maybe it's not a TC but as sure as hell it's no TS either. If it's a TC it seems like it's got a loooong way gone through some videotape copies ...

But judging from the sample it's definitely watchable - the "lightsaber-effects" of the sound are some kind of annoying, but everything is understandable... i can live with that anyway.

I give it a 6/7/? - will see the whole thing within the next days...


Posted by Airhead2 on 10-31-2005 11:26 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by HoHoHoDeadGiant
I wish u would fuck off and die of aids or something. You are the fucking retard.

No seriously your a fucking cock smoking retard. What a pity ban idol never got u.

Anyway to rate the fucking movie instead of crying about what theve labelled it

6/8/ Film fucking sucked.

Ok u can ban me now



Awww did i make a PRODiGY member upset with my post .... yet i still dont care.

Of course you also dont care about bans, everyone in PRODiGY is used to scene bans and how to use proxy's, new bnc's and new nicks to get back in ... why would vcdquality be different!


Posted by pelu on 10-31-2005 01:39 PM:

well here we are again debating ts or tc, this movie has to be a tc, there is no way they got get that flicker at the bottom from a ts, unless there was a heavy wind inside the theater and the screen was blowing back and forth, its TC just not a good one asa they stated in there nfo. no need for people to bash, the guys who are taking the risk to supply, just give simple rating's and leave it at that.

V=6
a=7
m=4

see how easy

__________________
bleh!


Posted by SHaKiNGBRaVe on 10-31-2005 02:40 PM:

video : 6...couldn't they have internaled perhaps and let another group give this a shot? would be a shame if a real tc surfaced and wasn't released because this was out

audio : 7...direct, no real complaints

for anyone who's wondering...zorro and doom are NOT tc's...a tc by definition is directly sourced from film reels. if you project it and shoot it off a screen, it's not a tc no matter how you slice it. and i agree...definately looks like it had a couple analogue generations somewhere in there.

__________________
fus j00


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:45 AM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.