VCDQuality Forums - The Legend of Zorro *XviD* - TELECINE

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 21 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- DIVX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- The Legend of Zorro *XviD* - TELECINE - ASTEROiDS (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=66983)

Posted by X69 on 10-31-2005 02:29 PM:

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

6 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

7 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

8 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

Posted by pelu on 10-31-2005 02:32 PM:

well this is from the same source, but much better encode, sound is good a little to much base, but all and all good, picture is cropped quite a bit, but the flicker is not as bad. i would say it is in fact tc, just played across an old projector. if you want to see the film i would say this is going to be your best bet.

v=7(higher if not for the over cropping)
a=8
m=5

__________________
bleh!

Posted by Roger on 10-31-2005 02:36 PM:

you sound idiot when you saying its a tc playing accross a old projector, a real tc is not made from a projector, a ts is,
in fact, our actual *ts* aren't true ts because a real ts should be 24 fps captured with profesional device, real tc are done with a machine that scan every frame of the print.

also, there is a machine for sell on ebay calling TC wich is something you mount in front of the projector that will digitalise print, but againt, its not a tc ...

Posted by dw33p on 10-31-2005 02:55 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Roger
you sound idiot when you saying its a tc playing accross a old projector, a real tc is not made from a projector, a ts is,
in fact, our actual *ts* aren't true ts because a real ts should be 24 fps captured with profesional device, real tc are done with a machine that scan every frame of the print.

also, there is a machine for sell on ebay calling TC wich is something you mount in front of the projector that will digitalise print, but againt, its not a tc ...

What you call a TC and not a TC is purely something from your own. Those machine's you are reffering to *are* TC machines, only not the proffesional (verry expensive) big machines the company's use to digitalise there (old) tapes.

If you look at google images you will find this picture: http://www.broadcaststore.com/image...large/17021.jpg
(the macine of the picture is availible in the Price Range: From $45,000 to $63,000, now imagine why cheaper (still not cheap!) machines are used ....)

That does not mean those other machines do not procude TC's, that are also TC machines using a different (cheaper) way to digitalise movies.

Its time the bashing about "waaaa, this is a ts... nah, this is deff a tc .. no man, this is a ts.. "are over. Just rate the fucking video you get without doing anything usefull yourself or else dont download it and dont reply with bashing reply's.

Posted by hugmad on 10-31-2005 05:15 PM:

V=8
A=6
M=7
I love this movie, so any image of this is great for me, bye...

Posted by Diablo_g60 on 10-31-2005 06:17 PM:

Bunch of whingers

Stop yer whinging and remember you get this from the risk and good willing of the suppliers..
Its like being in a classroom with a bunch of thumb sucking kids !!!
Props to Asteroids and maven etc for turning out some good watchable quality xvids(the best source there is )..

Posted by Trybrow on 10-31-2005 07:46 PM:

ahem.. in any case this IS a TC. and not one of those smelly mislabelled TS that asteroids are now famous for. Thanks Asteroids, i give you back your head.. just dont lie to me again!

Posted by megara on 10-31-2005 07:52 PM:

same source like the kinofan rls, but english dubbed
regards 2 russia

Posted by dronso on 11-01-2005 12:15 AM:

nice release very watchable worth the download

v 9
a 8.5
m 7

Posted by vingamm on 11-01-2005 03:11 AM:

You know what, everytime someone releases a really good quality flick we have to have these debates about is it or is it not what they say it is. We have been complainging all summer about the bad quality of the releases and all the f'ed up CAMS. Let's end it shall we. I have seen some TCs this year that made me want to laugh at the fuckers that labeled them that way. This is not the case with Asteriods. They do quality work. Even if it is a TS it looks 100% better than most of the TSes and TCs released lately. To the newbie know it alls and flamers let's stick to what the forum is here for. RATING THE QUALITY OF THE WORK!!!. That being said, I think the quality is excellent. Crisp color great sound and honestly much better than all the other releases I have seen. Good work guys. keep it up.

9/9/7 (The movis is funny but drags a bit)

Posted by b_3 on 11-01-2005 04:26 AM:

Frankly I'm sick of hearing if things are TC or TS. For many releases you could debate it to be a TS or TC forever. Groups using silver PDVD's or video found on Russian newgroups as a source don't allways know for certain, so they have to guess based on if there is alot motion blur, heads getting up, tilt on the camera.

According to WikiPedia a telecine is simply the process of converting analogue video to digital video, meaning in theory a CAM could be a form of TeleCine. For the scene however a telecine seems to be accepted as a film trasfered with a profesional 24fps camera in a machine rather than pointed at a cinema screen, and of course with direct audio. Just because it hasnt been made using the studio grade machines doesn't mean it isnt a telecine, the machines I have seen on ebay are definatly real telecine machines.

Quality is quality, no matter where it comes from. So unless there is real proof that it isnt a TeleCine (motion blur, bad tilt, heads bobbing up and down in front of the screen) I do not see any reason for people to make claims it isnt a "real" TC. It has long been known that TCs vary in quality, to the point that a good TS can be far better than a poorly made TC.

I know I am really not in the correct position to say this, but hey, just my two cents.

Anyway, to the point.

Video: 8 - slightly blury picture (not motion blur), but very good anyway
Audio: 8 - sounds fine to me
Movie: havn't seen

edit: added rating for this release

Posted by josh_rs on 11-01-2005 04:38 AM:

Judging from sample: very good audio, loud and clear, must see the entire release tomorrow to know if there's too much bass as someone said. Video shows vivid colour and no flickering, sharp too, you can see peoples faces in details, different than other releases lately. No doubt the best release so far, thanks asteroids.

9,8,Will watch tomorrow

Posted by Dwaggy on 11-01-2005 09:00 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by b_3
Bullshit

You're wrong, champ. A telecine is made with the original film reels and an actual machine called, get this, a telecine machine

__________________

i have sigs off

Posted by deathr0w_ on 11-01-2005 09:57 AM:

what a terrible followup to a great original film thankgod it was free

V:7 A:6

telecines can be way better than this the colours were nice and bright but to washy audio once again was terrible very crap.

but who cares it was free any quality is good for a freebie

Posted by goman on 11-02-2005 08:21 AM:

8,7,5 1st film was crap and this was no better... the missus likes antonio

Posted by Doomsdayer on 11-02-2005 10:11 AM:

video: 6 - Video was showing wave lines in and out.... I'm not sure if im the only one exp. that, but it was annoying...
Audio: 7 - sound was decent for a TS
Movie: Turned it off just now... seemed a bit cheesey.

Posted by darksoad on 11-02-2005 11:29 AM:

a real example of that TSs can be better than poorly made TCs is maven's TSs

Posted by crudman on 11-02-2005 07:06 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Roger
you sound idiot

a ts is, in fact, our actual *ts* aren't true ts because a real ts should be 24 fps captured with profesional device

Who is the one who "sound idiot" ? Becuase the ONLY, I repeat the ONLY requirement for a TS is direct audio (usually from handicapped headphone plug). It can be the crappiest cam ever, with people blocking everything and walking past the whole movie, but if it has that direct audio its a TS.

Now generally there's an expectation that a TS will have better video, and often it does. But its certainly not a requirement.

Posted by b_3 on 11-02-2005 10:25 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Dwaggy
You're wrong, champ. A telecine is made with the original film reels and an actual machine called, get this, a telecine machine

Just repeating what was said at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecine. You are right in saying that a proper telecine comes from a telecine machine of course, but the world (according to wiki) just means the process of converting analogue video to digital.

Posted by bottles on 11-07-2005 08:16 PM:

Vid 4 - dull colours and bad "waving"
Audio 8
Flick 6

Think people must be watching a diff release...colors and "waving" are terrible... maybe sample has been touched up, but full release has pretty poor vid. ..haven't seen other releases, so can't compare

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:00 PM.

Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 21 posts from this thread on one page