VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 36 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- DIVX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- Casino Royale *PROPER* *READNFO* *XviD* - TELECINE - LRC (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=73581)


Posted by X69 on 12-08-2006 03:57 AM:


IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES (THIS INCLUDES REQUESTS FOR OTHER GROUPS TO RELEASE THIS MOVIE!)

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 DO NOT ASK FOR "RAR PASSWORDS" COS WE DON'T KNOW THEM. CHECK WITH YOUR SOURCE

4 NO FLAMING

5 NO "SPOILERS"

6 NO SCENE-RELATED DISCUSSION/RUMORS (ESPECIALLY REGARDING BUSTS)

7 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE ONLY (AND ONLY IF YOU'VE SEEN AT LEAST THE SAMPLE). THIS IS THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THE THREAD!

8 NO "NOOB" QUESTIONS SUCH AS "HOW DO I WATCH THIS?" ASK IN THE APPROPRIATE PART OF THE FORUM

9 NO DISCUSSING TRADING/SELLING. IF YOU SELL COPIES, GO AWAY YOU'RE NOT WELCOME HERE

* Newbie questions? Want some weird term clarifying? Read our FAQ

* General questions unrelated to this release? Internet LOL's? Right here dudes


*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***


Posted by FoGgEdOuT on 12-08-2006 04:01 AM:

This is a fast release for a TC. Like less than a month since Theater Release.

From the sample:

Video: 9 (Slight flicker that can be noticed. But I am not sure if that is normal in TC's. Great quality video)

Audio: 8 (Clear, Static noise is audible throughout the sample)

Movie: 10 (I absolutely loved this film, crappy ending though)


Posted by nickrolando on 12-08-2006 04:03 AM:

better then pukka?


Posted by FoGgEdOuT on 12-08-2006 04:05 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by nickrolando
better then pukka?
Of course it is. Its a effin R5 Source


Posted by Jules_Tavernier on 12-08-2006 04:05 AM:

if u watch from the start it looks like a ts.

also im watching with headphones on and the audio is pretty terrible, i might have to turn it off and wait for another rrelease


8/5/?

__________________
And then they decided to charge him with common assault - with a sausage.


Posted by cookiemaster on 12-08-2006 04:10 AM:

looks like the same to me. If this is retail those poor Russians.


Posted by sirhc on 12-08-2006 04:17 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Jules_Tavernier
if u watch from the start it looks like a ts.

also im watching with headphones on and the audio is pretty terrible, i might have to turn it off and wait for another rrelease


8/5/?



thats because it is a ts


Posted by kelnar on 12-08-2006 05:46 AM:

exactly the same as pukkas, apart from the video being split at a different time.
the scene has turned to shit


Posted by Horton on 12-08-2006 05:54 AM:

are you guys blind ? to me this is blatantly obvious a differant source..and a dvd one...good job LRC....dunno what all these guys leeched.


8/7/3

if you want proof, look at the opening james bond credits - its plainly obvious that its some sort of dvd src..


Posted by FlyingDutchman on 12-08-2006 08:12 AM:

8/5/8

picture quality is great, maybe slightly bright but hey you can adjust the brightness/contrast of your tv eh
definately watchable

but damn this audio source is horrible, same as earlier releases, the volume goes up and down and it seems the treble is way to high

the audio ruined it.. the movie is great though

don't say anything about the audio if you've just seen the sample... not quite a representative sample


Posted by THA1icarus on 12-08-2006 09:03 AM:

V- 7
A- 7
m- only seen sampel

It's ok seen better TC or R5's what ever it is the TC from borat seem a lot better...


Posted by OSH on 12-08-2006 10:51 AM:

Hmm I don't know what to make of this. I truly don't think that it is the Pukka release but I could be wrong? It's sad that I can't tell if this might be a TS or not...it does look like a TC...but not the best.

8 [dull color, clear picture] /8/?

Again, hmm...after comparing the two releases I'd say this is a TC. Slightly cropped. Pukkas cam was to the right, this one is centered. I think that Pukkas release had better color, seeing as this one is dull. But I would have to say that this is the one to get. I could be wrong, whatever.

__________________


I'm gay. <3 <3 <3


Posted by kelnar on 12-08-2006 11:31 AM:

it's exactly the same video just cropped to make it look center, and as for audio well the intro themesong is the dead give away cause sound drops in and out like pukkas exactly.
mislabled and stolen to boot. LRC are idiots


Posted by OSH on 12-08-2006 11:53 AM:

Since I have nothing better to do I just got through comparing the two releases and this is definitely a different source. You can tell in the opening credits when it says, 'Casino Royale'. In this release when the title is shown there is a static line going through the film, whilst in Pukkas release it is not present. Hope that clears up all this confusion for you...again, I could be wrong.

__________________


I'm gay. <3 <3 <3


Posted by lletaif on 12-08-2006 11:56 AM:

Not taste of this type of film. The quality of the copy is very good.
Picture ok. Sound still has problems.

V: 8
A: 7
M: 7


Posted by Beanz on 12-08-2006 12:14 PM:

video is v good


sound is stolen from previous TS with questionable sync issues in the film

thought film was utter rubbish


9/7/4


Posted by piet007 on 12-08-2006 02:58 PM:

this is no dvd source, no way.
this is plain ts, no tc.
LRC made some adjustments to try and fool the ignorant.
Like the cropping, the intro as mentioned before.Just compare it with pukkas.

1 for stealing.


Posted by dotpitch on 12-08-2006 03:18 PM:

v: 8 (good colors, doesn't look like a cam job)
a: 5 (same as pukka, 3.5 kHz noise all over the place, no perfect sync. watchable, but i hoped for something better.)
m: 8 (not the real "bond" yet, but a good movie)


Posted by ambientmike on 12-08-2006 05:12 PM:

http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/798b951101.png

OK - this compares it to Pukka's

No way is it the same source


Posted by stacy532 on 12-08-2006 06:34 PM:

pukkas was good enough to watch why waste time trying to make perfection on a movie thats already done well? they should be doing turistas or something else that has bad quality ....

__________________


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:27 PM. Pages (2): [1] 2 »
Show all 36 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.