Pages (2): « 1 [2] Show all 30 posts from this thread on one page |
VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Knockaround Guys *SHEEP FiX* - SCREENER - VideoCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=10067)
nuking these
i have been in the .. i dunno "scene" for a loong time.. since compuserv and local dialup BBS days. just never got intointo it enough to realize who or why people nuke things. or to get on a topsite or whatever. i just irc. anyways.. why do these people nuke things that are perfect videos and all.. just because they do not like the movie or the group ? or a minor infraction in the nfo. ? oh well. just checkin.. peace
Does anyone have a real review out there?
Sheep are fuzzy and warm and they don't talk. That means your 'secrets' are safe
__________________
I cut the pockets out of all my pants
Sheep nuking is retarded, I would think that nukers appointed on sites actually do know something about nuking without looking at what others do.
Question....
Why nuke something anyway . Fair enough its a pain in the ass to dload something that either isnt what they say it is or has something wrong with it. Only thing is if it wasnt for groups like this we WOULD have the film anyway. We would have to go pay at the cinema or buy the dvd like normal people do. It FREE so why keep bitching about it. If u want something with no hassle and nothing wrong with it go fork out for the original. Answer this . Where would u be if groups got that pissed off they STOPPED releasing stuf period. Then u would say "they werent THAT bad"
*looks up* and to finish off
Shut The F*&k up and enjoy what u get for nothing.
the "you dont pay for it, so be happy" argument is invalid in the scene. if thats your attitude, then fair enough, but do not imply it on others cos it simply doesn't work that way.
if it wasn't for the staff and linkops of the affil sites, the groups wouldn't have anything, if it wasn't for the couriers the releases wouldn't spread, and if it wasn't for the groups there'd be nothing to spread anyway. everyone contributes on top level, and if it trickles down to usenet/p2p/fxp etc, then you should be grateful for that, but dont tell site staff what to do. its their hardware, and they have every right to site nuke if they believe its the right decision.
__________________
563-773-1880
<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot
purple monkey dishwasher
shit like this shouldn't be on the board. wastes our time, and gets blown out of proportion
Sorry if this is common knowledge but why would a release be labeled as "limited"? More importantly who would care wether or not it was "limited", enough so to nuke it fot that reason?
:: well if a site has "No Limited" in its rules, then why not :P - pHo
Now I am confused, so what exactly is this release? Is it a repack, or just the same thing re-released?
quote:
Originally posted by Diezel
Now I am confused, so what exactly is this release? Is it a repack, or just the same thing re-released?
__________________
Tobytl - That thing that went 'bump' in the night, and left a gooey mess to prove it...
Personally when i thought about downloading this I checked the nfo once i saw the size of the release.
All it was was a version of internet explorer, supposedly so the nukers could learn how to use it before they started nuking for shitty wrong reasons.
This is the opinion of the group not my own.
Im all for nuking because of wrong labelling, but maybe not for ommitting the word limited even if correct, if I want the movie I dont care if it's a limited release. If I am going to download a cam I want to know beforehand. If I think I'm getting a dvdscreener then that's what I want after downloading.
I appreciate the groups work and will download the release anyway, just dont lie about it please.
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:07 PM. | Pages (2): « 1 [2] Show all 30 posts from this thread on one page |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.