VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- 8 Crazy Nights - TELECINE - VideoCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=12289)

quote:

---

Originally posted by NinjaRoach



What the fucks your problem... you're acting like somebody is making you download EVERY god damn version that comes out!... no... you get the copy that you're happy with and shut the fuck up... You're almost as bad as being a music critic... can't make the shit so ya bitch about everybody who's actually getting off there ass and puting in some work to make the shit for you to bitch about... god you're wasting my bandwidth

---

ahaha. so much flamin around here.
cant we all jus get along

don't be lame damn newbs

Re: Re: Mis labelled

quote:

---

Originally posted by backoff


Uhh... WTF are you talking about. I dont usually flame, but that was just stupid. Really think before you post. All videocd (or at least almost all) have counters in them. No matter what they are as long as they arent dvdrips (which they usually dont do)

---

didnt like the movie but judging by the sample this is a great release

quote:

---

Originally posted by m-drew

You can shut the fuck up to bitch.. you fucking fag.. suck my mother fucking dick...

your bandwidth. lol.. like 1kb... oh shit, your poor ass is on like what a 14.4 modem so i guess it takes a while.. fuck off.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by m-drew
Why? I watched this movie, and the VORTEX quality was perfectly watchable. Im sick of the VCD scene and how every movie has been released about 2-4 times before we can settle on it. I mean PROPERs are exceptable, but when you have 3 copies of this movie, 7 copies of 007 etc.. it just gets annonying.

---

<quote> Why? I watched this movie, and the VORTEX quality was perfectly watchable. Im sick of the VCD scene and how every movie has been released about 2-4 times before we can settle on it. I mean PROPERs are exceptable, but when you have 3 copies of this movie, 7 copies of 007 etc.. it just gets annonying.
</quote>

lmao moron

quote:

---

Originally posted by KaMa


Eat Shit and Die..

---

um... i think he meant eat old burnt krusty shit and die

__________________

This is an excellent release

Vortex version wasnt good the Colours are faded and its blocky the sound was poor also

This is much better

The more releases the better . its only 1CD and only takes a couple of hours to download

8/8/7

Nice one VideoCD!

Re: Re: Re: Mis labelled

quote:

---

Originally posted by DarkBeatz


In fact you are the dumbass, all videocds are in fact screeners and I think they should lable them as such, they just think they are cool because they label it telecine because the movie company telecined it and then mastered it to a vhs tape, so to be correct this is mislabeled

---

watchin the movie now, seems to be decent quality
kinda goofy
but all in all, Im golad I got this one, instead of waiting for a bigger dvd rip version, (wouldve been a waste of two discs)

wasn't good enough

pretty good release VideoCD (watched the sample) but this movie wasn't good enough for me to download the TC, stickin with the FTF I am...(Not that i'll ever watch the movie again :P)

6/6/5..I'll explain why

the video looked good..but it lost major points for having black and white scenes when they had the "Property Of" stuff on it, honestly, that bites, it was annoying to.

The audio, it sounded a bit muffled and at some times...clipped.

The movie itself, it blew. It wasn't as good as everyone made it out to be. Too many musical scenes. I guess I have grown up more than I thought.

M-Drew must be a genius, they're two seperate genres of releases one's Cam Video, One's Direct Reel Feed, which is why VideoCD released it, if it were a TS it would be duped ass.

...on multiple releases...

<2cents>

As noted, this is a TC, not a TS. Also as noted, the TC was appreciated by some as the TS had a sound issue.

I wanted to point out that multiple releases in different formats is not only "acceptable" but ENCOURAGED. Mocking a release in TC when the TS was released would be like saying there shouldn't be a DivX of a movie when the DVDrip was available.

What I think some people are attempting to explain to the noobs is that when you have several groups releasing the same movie in the same format, it's taking up valuable space. That can hurt the scene (not because of one release, but if it becomes habitual it surely will). That's why a few groups tried to set standards for SVCDs - if the standard is adhered to, there'd be no "need" for a re-release by another group. It's different with TS/TC because of the source and capture method, as many movies do have picture and/or sound quality issues that beg for a *Proper* to be released.

As far as this release goes, I've finally gotten around to looking at it. Rating it by TC standards and keeping in mind it's an animated feature, I give it 8/8/5 (the movie's got some funny parts and both of Sandler's fans will probably buy this on DVD).

</2cents>

quote:

---

Originally posted by m-drew

You can shut the fuck up to bitch.. you fucking fag.. suck my mother fucking dick...

your bandwidth. lol.. like 1kb... oh shit, your poor ass is on like what a 14.4 modem so i guess it takes a while.. fuck off.

---

fuk yo, yall bunch of nerds anyways .... why dont u just give props to all the groups and what they do for you rather then bitch about stupid retarded shit ... how something looks or why there is so many different releases....

enjoy what is giving to you.