VCDQuality Forums Pages (6): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »
Show all 107 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Final Destination 2 - TELESYNC - ESOTERiC (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=14066)


Posted by CinapS on 01-23-2003 06:57 PM:

Great movie not as good as the first. As for the quality. The video is great. Audio sucked only plays through the left speaker.
I give it 8,4,9


Posted by Stabbe on 01-23-2003 07:04 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by CinapS
Great movie not as good as the first. As for the quality. The video is great. Audio sucked only plays through the left speaker.
I give it 8,4,9



Uhm i checked the movie again , and it plays through both speakers , maybe not stereo , but it plays on right and left speaker.

__________________
"i think i am getting hacked. my modem lights are flashing..."


Posted by mkay on 01-23-2003 07:22 PM:

whoa! didnt know that this one was coming just hope its as good as the first part =) congrats eso!


Posted by aXs-SVCD on 01-23-2003 07:41 PM:

Just got the sample, i didn't even know there is part 2 for this movie! will now i got it, First one was great with 2 endings i hope this also have 2 endings, story looks good!

Now about this release!

Sound is not bad, Picture is good colorfull, little bit bright. But who cares. You want it you go find it and download it i wanted this movie and i got it and now i am gona watch it!!!!!

Thanx ESOTRERiC you got my respects! keep bringing new stuff!

__________________
Lets See What's New Today
( VCDQUALITY ROCKS )

OK, Please Stop asking for Movies, and Go and find it.


Posted by dopeuser8 on 01-23-2003 07:41 PM:

Scream 4 - The Final Chapter *FAKE* CHeOPS (3.30.2002)
...wasn't this one actually Final Destination? (If I remember correctly) besides that Ive never even heard of the first one


Posted by aXs-SVCD on 01-23-2003 07:43 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by dopeuser8
Scream 4 - The Final Chapter *FAKE* CHeOPS (3.30.2002)
...wasn't this one actually Final Destination? (If I remember correctly) besides that Ive never even heard of the first one



No Scream 4 is a real movie i have that, and it dose say Scream 4 at the start of it and that movie sucks HUGE!!!!!!!!

This movie is alot better then that !!!!! and nooo its not the same

__________________
Lets See What's New Today
( VCDQUALITY ROCKS )

OK, Please Stop asking for Movies, and Go and find it.


Posted by Ha0s on 01-23-2003 07:46 PM:

bravoooooo for a good release and an early one too ,m,,


Posted by likwid8 on 01-23-2003 07:57 PM:

Im going to download this movie because of the blonde chick...

that' all


Posted by Medievalchimp on 01-23-2003 08:02 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by nicci
---------------
just finished watchin it, definitly the best movie this year ! [/B]


The "year" started 23 days ago

__________________
Hay


Posted by LiQuIdMuNkY on 01-23-2003 08:10 PM:

Very nice quality for a TS Eso, Video is great and sound is very good.
7/8/?

__________________
I dont know, whats a good sig?


Posted by lo.pro on 01-23-2003 08:15 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by aXs-SVCD


No Scream 4 is a real movie i have that, and it dose say Scream 4 at the start of it and that movie sucks HUGE!!!!!!!!

This movie is alot better then that !!!!! and nooo its not the same



lol i remember that release... yeah, it says scream 4, but that was just a title that somebody made, it was a definite fake... don't remember what the movie was, some 'b' flick lol

__________________

This perceived misuse of Internet resources caused former Dutch education minister Loek Hermans to comment: "It would be nice if the students at Twente University would use their fast connections for information and education purposes, instead of downloading huge amounts of porn."


____________________________________ knowing is the easy part _____________


.


Posted by Static on 01-23-2003 08:39 PM:

holy fuck, that "Scream 4" with Molly Ringworm was an
abomination.

this release is tight. get off the dvd screener tip.
gotta wait till next oscar season for that kind of quality.

nice pre TS.


Posted by Necrology on 01-23-2003 09:26 PM:

Sample looks terrific, But I'm going to wait for the DVD Screener.


Posted by your name her on 01-23-2003 09:37 PM:

WOW AWESOME TS LOOKS LIKE A SCREENER TO ME WITH THOSE COLOURS 8/7/?

great job esoteric

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6


How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????



Posted by Ripper on 01-23-2003 10:37 PM:

Take a look there lol good old bbc http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/comingsoon/diary.shtml
pic slanted at the start sound is ok for this pic is ok and very watchable


6/5/6


sound goes funny once on cd1 30 mins into it and pic flickers on cd2 for a sec good film good effects
pic nice no proper needed tilll the tc or screener comes out

__________________
I was never caught!


Posted by likwid8 on 01-23-2003 10:40 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Necrology
Sample looks terrific, But I'm going to wait for the DVD Screener.




I wouldn't wait for the DVD SCR.... This is a rare quality to find in a TS, very good picture.... not all are like this, grab it.... i sure am


Posted by rec0de on 01-23-2003 11:30 PM:

jeez i forgot how much we got screwed in uk with the belated rls's its a damn joke good job i moved over this side of the world plus the cinemas r way better here for watching movies i do miss del and rodders tho i just got told there was an only fools n horses xmas special thats fuckin pissed me right off cant beat UK tv cuz this commercial ridden yanky crap sucks ass 4 commercial breaks in the simpsons i kid u not.

oh yea btw why the hell do ppl vote on a movie b4 they even seen it :s it doesnt make u cool u know...really it doesnt


Posted by Spiv2 on 01-23-2003 11:38 PM:

The sound has a few problems where it goes really quiet, but it is still quite a good pre-release cam nonetheless. The video for the most part is constant to what you see in the .jpg sample - it only reshifts at one point from what I can remember. The movie itself is pretty decent, but the first one is definitely better.

6/5/7


Posted by insomnia79 on 01-23-2003 11:47 PM:

picture was ok, a bit bright but ok (except when they fumble a bit with the cam)
the sound was not that good, from time to time it sounded like the audio went from stereo to mono.

the flick itself was ok, the first one was better though. more splatter in this one (like in all sequels)


Posted by likwid8 on 01-24-2003 12:18 AM:

Well I want object to that...:


See here in vcdquality.com, the jpegs arep osted to see the quality of the release, now when people judge the movie just from the jpeg, most people shout out to the user who declared it was a horrible picture quality due to the jpeg posted..


The best way of judging a movie os from the sample, not the jpeg, the pictures stand up for a reason, and that is too also show the quality, but depending on who captured that sample and how good of a job they did...

I think we all need to just relax and stop insulting others.... I think the best way is to judge a sample by stating from the jpeg or the sample, there then no one will get insulted....


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:07 AM. Pages (6): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »
Show all 107 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.