VCDQuality Forums - Star Trek Nemesis - SCREENER

Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 57 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Star Trek Nemesis - SCREENER - VERiTY (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=14945)

Posted by Heflink on 02-10-2003 08:54 PM:

Quality is not the best. The sound is okay but the video is grainy. Looks like a vhs screener to me, but I dont know enough about telecine to say whether or not it is one.

Best release so far, thats all I can say.

5/7/6

Posted by buttheaduk on 02-10-2003 09:07 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Heflink
. Looks like a vhs screener to me, but I dont know enough about telecine to say whether or not it is one.
5/7/6

Maybe it is a VHS Screener

btw who said it was a telecine?

Posted by CaptainPooHat on 02-10-2003 10:52 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by buttheaduk

Maybe it is a VHS Screener

btw who said it was a telecine?

CinapS did

im not gettin this rls simply because of the commercials ..'AS GOOD AS STARWARS' ..my ass. theres no way its that good, but i'm easily persuaded i suppose so ill wait for a better rls or...dare i say...the dvd ..might be worth the rental.

6/7/waaaaaiting~

__________________
Saving the world from danger with a piece of shit on my head.

Posted by daz..griff on 02-11-2003 12:21 AM:

not bad alot better than the last 1.. thats about it.

Posted by X400 on 02-11-2003 01:25 AM:

the last star wars sucked.. even phantom menace was eghhh but not as bad as this last one omg it was sad last 45mins was the only good part in the star wars flick

star trek on the other hand this isnt one of their stonger movies but its still a better watch then the last star wars movie

release kinda looks like it was recorded from a shitty vhs tape
but still worth it if you cant wait another month? for the dvd
7/7.5/7

Posted by pHizZ on 02-11-2003 01:33 AM:

i'm pretty sure its VHS screener. Looks like a copy of a copy; the ripping could have been a lot better.

Posted by CcZ on 02-11-2003 01:54 AM:

This is, no matter what it is (ts, tc, scr, cam), the best release of this movie yet. It is not excellent quality and property signs get in the way and it's a little grainy, but it's definitly the best release yet. As for a dvd screener or rip, this movie is supposed to come out on dvd/vhs on May 13th as says this web site: http://www.trektoday.com/news/070203_01.shtml
The dvd rip and screener shouldn't be that far away so i'd suggest waiting (expect it late feb-early april) until a better one comes out unless your a die hard fan!

Posted by LiQuIdMuNkY on 02-11-2003 05:56 AM:

I see that it has been nuked on numerous sites that i am on, but not all, very strange, I thought it was alright quality, definatly watchable.

__________________
I dont know, whats a good sig?

Posted by FOS on 02-11-2003 07:27 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by VCD_MAD
WOW about time we got a good release of this movie

keep up the good work .

p.s

can one of the vcdquality member fix my voting privileges out plz

Your voting privileges have been revoked for abuse...
click here to explain why you voted 1/1/1 or 10/10/10's..

NOT TRUE

cos i allways vote fair

fag.

Posted by coathanger on 02-11-2003 08:25 AM:

Just saw the sample, If thats a screener then they need to let someonlse rip it

Posted by sickdick on 02-11-2003 09:18 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by CinapS

If you weren’t so stupid you would know telecines are also made by production companies and some do have property labels you idiot. Get your shit straight before you post.

lol what a dork
go read the definition of telecine
its a copy made digitally from the REELs!!
which stupid production company puts copyright messages on the REELS ? u have any idea how much that cost?
haha, idiot

Posted by alundrety on 02-11-2003 10:30 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by TabascoJoe
You think we have a DVD screener by now

ditto

__________________
ehhhhh

Posted by blacks on 02-11-2003 12:56 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by sickdick

lol what a dork
go read the definition of telecine
its a copy made digitally from the REELs!!
which stupid production company puts copyright messages on the REELS ? u have any idea how much that cost?
haha, idiot

No offence, but he is right. Production companies do make telecines.
What you fail to see is the bigger picture. the copyright messages are not on the reels, but rather a post-telecining addition. Btw, most screeners are made from telecine method. Just a data transfer.
And as for your costs argument, come on, we are talking about the big players here. Not some porn film production crew.

Posted by sweetsour on 02-11-2003 01:15 PM:

I don't think that nowadays any production company makes telecines... The telecines around are pirate stuff.
So the property msgs mean that it is a screener..

Posted by nikelrah on 02-11-2003 04:02 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by sweetsour
I don't think that nowadays any production company makes telecines... The telecines around are pirate stuff.
So the property msgs mean that it is a screener..

well, if they don't shoot the whole thing digital they have to transfer it from the reels -> vhs/dvd etc at some point

[general rant]

but i don't really see the fuss about the whole Screener/Telecine issue. Quality wise a Telecine can be better than a commercial Screener (JP3 anyone?) and vice-versa. Also in most cases Screeners are still made by telecining the reels, so it's technically the same.

I think VideoCD(?) just introduced the Telecine-Tag for low-standard/very early/heavy watermarked screeners. I also find it rather amusing that some people even claim a release is a Telecine just because it has a counter/serial. Some Screeners have counters, some don't, some Telecines have "property of" messages, some don't. So everyone please stop pulling things out of your ass when you obbiously don't really have a clue. Imho it's almost impossible to tell if something is a "real" Screener or "just" a Telecine just from the encode itself.

[/general rant].

Posted by Mak Man on 02-11-2003 04:16 PM:

Who cares if it's nuked, it's still the best copy i've seen out there.

Good job VERiTY!

Mak.

Posted by sickdick on 02-11-2003 07:07 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by aXs-SVCD
Just got the sample, this movie is alot better Quality then first and 2nd rls!!!!, sound got alot better, Quality is alright worth downloading....

( NUKED EVERYWHERE )

- Not VCD complaint

VERiTY repak it please

Thanx for bringing a good movie VERiTY

this is how i fixed it
extracted mpg from bin/cue using vcdgear then followed by extracting the mpg in tmpeg and remuxing in tmpg by selecting mpeg1 vcd compliant, then burning the mpeg in nero
works fine for me that way

Posted by WeBMaSTeR on 02-11-2003 11:23 PM:

VERY poor quality for a screener. Looks like a TS (I know it isn't).

While the best out there - it still sux !!!

Should have viewed it before I burnt it - just wasted a couple of CD's

Posted by elmo on 02-12-2003 12:34 AM:

damn webmaster WASTED cds? geeze i aint seen you out on any street corners *flicks you 50p* i know i know cd's are oh so exp

Posted by coathanger on 02-12-2003 12:50 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by WeBMaSTeR
VERY poor quality for a screener. Looks like a TS (I know it isn't).

While the best out there - it still sux !!!

Should have viewed it before I burnt it - just wasted a couple of CD's

Have you ever heard of cd-rw. If the quality is crap all you have lost is burning time.

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:38 PM.

Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 57 posts from this thread on one page