VCDQuality Forums - The Matrix Reloaded *iNTERNAL* *SVCD* - TELESYNC

Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 50 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Matrix Reloaded *iNTERNAL* *SVCD* - TELESYNC - TCF (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=19878)

Posted by CcZ on 05-23-2003 02:20 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Scorch
but judging from the jpg, it's a much better picture!

Please, Please, PLEASE don't judge only on the JPG!

Posted by altimas on 05-23-2003 03:04 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by CczuAzul

Please, Please, PLEASE don't judge only on the JPG!

Ya! JPGs make it look alot better than most movies are, certainly CTP's!. The JPG shows a clear pic, while it is grainy.

Posted by ShortFuse on 05-23-2003 03:21 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by CczuAzul

Please, Please, PLEASE don't judge only on the JPG!

If you are going to nag at somebody, at least read everything they wrote. Scorch said:

"...now I gotta look for this one! Hehehe.. the chase is on again! I'll rate when I get back but judging from the jpg, it's a much better picture!"

i got your back, Scorch

As for my opinions, looking at the jpg looks better than CTP's.gunna grab the sample, then rate. damn internals

Posted by buttzaking on 05-23-2003 03:50 AM:

TCF Reloaded

Top marks for honesty and 50 points for the nfo. Way to go guys.

Confussers say man who juggles with egg end up with egg on face.....

Posted by SSirhc on 05-23-2003 03:55 AM:

good job
4/3/9

Posted by TR0N on 05-23-2003 04:16 AM:

TCF release is grainy. IMO CTP looks better but I hate that angle. CTP is 2.3gig, TCF is 1.6gig. Which do you think would look better?

Posted by moviebootlegger on 05-23-2003 05:28 AM:

:: don't flame again. -K. ::

Posted by Micro9mm on 05-23-2003 05:31 AM:

SOOOOO refreshing to actualy get some iNFO in a .nfo

And they actualy recommend NOT to download their release...gota love the honesty. I think ill do what TCF recomends and keep the CTP release.

Posted by DiSRUPToR on 05-23-2003 06:14 AM:

quality exceeds release speed yet again tcf a great job with this one. the sound is slightly better than CTP, but I had no beef with that one really. The picture is definitely better than the CTP rls. I had to fiddle with the gamma and contrast until that damn 'shiny skin' effect was gone. The nfo was... hmm.. colourful.

9/8/9 - Yes after about 14 posts I finally watched the CTP version.. good movie, nowhere near as good as it's predecessor.

__________________
I Have This Thing, Advanced Dillusionary Schizofrenia with Involuntary Narcissistic Rage. It's No Big Deal.

Posted by yikes on 05-23-2003 06:51 AM:

beautiful!

Posted by desertboy on 05-23-2003 06:56 AM:

You're best TS yet, better than CTP which had an angle or possibly shot with a curved lens?

Sound not up to our usual standard but fine none the less.

8.5/7/6

The film is ok but it's not great. It's exactly as my cynical friend predicated. Ridiculous drawn out plot with lot's more bullet time & "kung fu". Wanky dialouge and a nonesensical plot and we all knew the spoon was making a comeback.

Much like the fiirst one a victory of style over content.

Just my 0.2 Cents

Why has Vcdquality.com sponsered the xbox N64 contest on xbins.org

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.

Posted by sherl0k on 05-23-2003 08:09 AM:

TCF gets a 10 for best NFO. for once a group is 100% honest about what they do.

Posted by Jesus H Christ on 05-23-2003 10:49 AM:

Movie Sucked

It's an enigma within an enigma. "The Matrix makes it real"....

Poor dialogue. Fight scenes would have been good if they didnt go on for so long. The Matrix has become to Stylised for it's own good.

Pity. The trailer made it look brilliant.

7/7/4

Posted by Challenger on 05-23-2003 02:25 PM:

Coudn't really se the point by releasing this one....Why don't they just get the dvd or vob-files, and rip them? :P

I'm waiting for a rip or a screener!

Posted by RMF on 05-23-2003 03:27 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Challenger
Coudn't really se the point by releasing this one....Why don't they just get the dvd or vob-files, and rip them? :P

I'm waiting for a rip or a screener!

Aren't we all?

Posted by SharkeysMachine on 05-23-2003 05:20 PM:

Nice release has very nice pic, audio is so so. They were honest in the nfo which is appreciated, but i'll stick with Ctp. Oh and all you bitchy motherfuckers out there, the angle isn't that bad on the Ctp release. You fuckers must be watchin it on some shit tv or through beer googles i dunno, thats my 2 cents on it

Posted by shorty6pac on 05-23-2003 05:55 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by elevated
more more more versions...im going to go to the theater and make my own version!!

nice looking pic

8/7/10

Great hurry up so everyone else will have someone else to flame, but no matter what i still give props to every group on the scene for their efforts

Posted by your name her on 05-23-2003 09:54 PM:

nice to see some groups admit there mistakes in there nfo

this imo is the best rls so far colors arent soo good but no angle and pretty damm sharp

sound does have a similar buzz like the 8 mile,old school rls's
very tolerable

9/7/10

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6

How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????

Posted by B18C5 on 05-23-2003 11:06 PM:

I just finished watching this release (not just the samples) on my Apex AD-5131 so now I can finally give a full review and comparison to the version I watched earlier by Centropy (we already know this beats the ESO/FTF/VCD/APM(only because SVCD has less pixelation/motion blur) versions:

Video (9) - The video is just as sharp, it's a little grainy (on pc) however I noticed that CTP's was also grainy but their color helps from making it too obvious, the colors are not as saturated as Centropy's but this was not a problem since I can increase the saturation on my TV (when I tried to decrease the saturation of CTP's on my TV the colors didn't look right, it was more yellow-ish in some scenes), the angle is perfect (a problem which annoyed me most in the other copy), and you can see more of the screen (CTP's is cropped ALOT on the bottom and sides when I compared them side by side). The downside is the short flickering but that only happened for a second or 2 in both disks so it was tolerable. So video imo is better than Centropy's.

Audio (7.5) - It's almost identical to CTP's, those who watched the whole thing would agree so don't be fooled by TCF's *.nfo. There is the small mequito buzz on quiet scenes but the other copy had it also. CTP's audio is a little loud though which caused static on my setup during loud scenes. Audio in Centropy's is better though cause I did notice the small echo that TCF said in their *.nfo.

Other than that I can't say anymore that the *.nfo has already. Overall I think the TCF copy outdoes Centropy's since it's just as good and much smaller. Both copies are great but I'm going to keep this copy until something better comes out. Hats off to both groups for high quality stuff, now bring on 2 Fast 2 Furious and HULK!

Posted by TReX_Vanquish on 05-24-2003 12:03 AM:

Between this and the CTP its pretty close the TCF has a better pic but i think it has more of a buzz than the CTP release.

I reckon ill stic with the CTP cause i can still watch it but i cant rearly take the TCF buzz.

TCF 8.5/4/8

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:40 PM.

Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 50 posts from this thread on one page