![]() |
Pages (5): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 » Show all 81 posts from this thread on one page |
VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The League Of Extraordinary Gentlemen *DUPE* *SVCD* - TELESYNC - Centropy (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=23927)
Video: 6 - Terrible angle, little bit grainy and it looks a bit washed out. The colors are alright, but its not too sharp.
Audio: 7 - Not the best, but not the worst. NOX did a better job.
Movie: N/A - Havent seen it.
Notes: Why does everyone kiss Centropys ass. This is NOT the best release of this so far, and it should be NUKED for being a DUPE. Im sick and tired of people always ranting on about how Centropy is good. They were good, they are lacking right now. They still havent figured out the angle properly, they crop their image to hell and they always move the damn camera during the movie. Their last release 'Legally Blonde 2' the camera moves all the time to try and make up for the cropped sides. Its like they move the camera in certain scenes when the Camera doesnt get. Its pathetic. STOP moving the camera and STOP thinking you are GODS and you dont have to follow Scene Rules.
And to everyone otu there who sucks Centropys dick, stop.
used to be a centropy fan latley they been taking a nose dive whats the deal centropy? vim buy you guys out? comparable quality....
nox release is much nicer better sound less angle and great picture! i told u fools nox was coming up.
great movie!
quote:
Originally posted by m-drew
Video: 6 - Terrible angle, little bit grainy and it looks a bit washed out. The colors are alright, but its not too sharp.
Audio: 7 - Not the best, but not the worst. NOX did a better job.
Movie: N/A - Havent seen it.
Notes: Why does everyone kiss Centropys ass. This is NOT the best release of this so far, and it should be NUKED for being a DUPE. Im sick and tired of people always ranting on about how Centropy is good. They were good, they are lacking right now. They still havent figured out the angle properly, they crop their image to hell and they always move the damn camera during the movie. Their last release 'Legally Blonde 2' the camera moves all the time to try and make up for the cropped sides. Its like they move the camera in certain scenes when the Camera doesnt get. Its pathetic. STOP moving the camera and STOP thinking you are GODS and you dont have to follow Scene Rules.
And to everyone otu there who sucks Centropys dick, stop.
[[[ a little later... ]]]
'CD1 password is'
uhh, no password in the NFO?
__________________
What can I say, im just a Movie Junkie!
quote:
Originally posted by rappa
Anyone can edit a JPG, try doign the REAL VIDEO.
i am disappointed, just look at the angle. the angle is starting to stick with me, look at my words.
7/7/x
-ryan
quote:
Originally posted by Pra3t0
Hmm... I wasn't try to impress anybody, just pointing out the difference for people who say "Angle? What angle? I don't see no stinkin' angle." I suppose the whole movie could be fixed thru Premiere or After Effects but it would be time consuming and delay release time. If only they capped it at the right angle in the first place...
mabe we should tweak our tvs and monitors so they get teh same angle and we get used to it
hahahahahahah
__________________

Video: Nice Pic , more viewable than the nox rls/
Audio: Good, but not aas good as nox rls
Movie: Good.
Summary: Another fine rls from ctp, but i agree that they come second in this rls to nox.
8|7|7
u know what... screw nox.. and their flamers.. every one of their releases has some idiot postin how it looks like a dvdrip.. and so on.. and about 10 ppl rating the quality a 9.. i just looked through the ratings for this.. and theres 6 or 7 people rating this below a 5 for video.. those same ppl rate every nox release an 8 or a 9... and rate every centropy release a 3-5.. some of them had the balls to rate t3 a 2.. which by far was the best release available.. didnt d/l the nox version.. and i wont.. centropy doesnt need to flame other groups.. they jsut put shit out always above average quality. yes some are better than others.. but i never see their membrs tanking other rips or trying to deceive ppl into believing its better than it really is.. i dont understand why a group needs to try and trick ppl into d/l their stuff.. certain groups need to back off and grow up.. and let ppl rate the movies unbiased.. as 4this flick 8/8 good job ctp.. keep em comin
quote:
Originally posted by aTTicA
u know what... screw nox.. and their flamers.. every one of their releases has some idiot postin how it looks like a dvdrip.. and so on.. and about 10 ppl rating the quality a 9.. i just looked through the ratings for this.. and theres 6 or 7 people rating this below a 5 for video.. those same ppl rate every nox release an 8 or a 9... and rate every centropy release a 3-5.. some of them had the balls to rate t3 a 2.. which by far was the best release available.. didnt d/l the nox version.. and i wont.. centropy doesnt need to flame other groups.. they jsut put shit out always above average quality. yes some are better than others.. but i never see their membrs tanking other rips or trying to deceive ppl into believing its better than it really is.. i dont understand why a group needs to try and trick ppl into d/l their stuff.. certain groups need to back off and grow up.. and let ppl rate the movies unbiased.. as 4this flick 8/8 good job ctp.. keep em comin
why even bother with a rls of this? one of the few movies that truly disappointed me, and i am very lenient, lol. they should concentrate on pirates, and concede this round to nox.
__________________
quote:
Originally posted by pHo
ok, well in future when you join a community that is very anti-sellers, you really should choose a username that isn't going to cause confusion and annoyance. its like joinin an arabic forum with the name BUSHRULES because you like the australian outback.
*New* from Centropy.... MidgetVision(tm)
Now you too can enjoy the perspective of a midget while watching your favorite movies.
Not to knock the TS it was, as always, better than average but some people can't see the trees for the forest. There is a big angle. Yes I know its a tradeoff, less reflected light and a closer screen makes for a better, flicker free picture. That doesnt mean it doesnt have a noticeable angle. Of course I'm not 4 feet tall so maybe life does really look like that for some. But for my money the angle method is just slightly better than movies with flickering.
Video 6: huge angle, better than average pic quality
Audio 8: direct from a good source
Movie ?: I'm afraid I won't understand its complex plot without some background reading so I'll just watch it when I finish these 6 books.
Unreal.. just because it's Centropy, you guys bump the video ratings up to 7/8.. if NOX or TCF released this exact copy, it'd be getting 4 or 5 on the video because of the awful angle.
5/6/?
Video is grainy and flickering. Overall quality of it is nice, but there is an angle. Sound is nice, I havent heard NOX's sound so I cant really comment on the difference, besides I just woke up and the volume of my speakers is still at low.
6/7/?
The release itself should be nuked. Centropy seems to have no honor whatsoever. They should either internal the stuff that they dupe, or they should proper it. They should drop the passwords. Noone can steal you're release when it's pred when its's done. I dont think they can download / extract / pack / upload / pre in the same time you upload the last file.
Dupe..
Centropy is slacking this summer. Whats up baby?
I'm sticking to the NOX release.
The angle sucks, as stated above.
Audio is ok, atleast I can understand what is being said.
Movie is pretty boring if you ask me.
6.5/7/6.5
They put passwords on rars because they know someone might wanna steal there release (ex. there own group members or topsite admins) They ul nfo last with the password in it and then pre it so that there release doesnt get jacked by a lamer.. and i remember this happening once.. 
After watching both the nox and the ctp release one can conclude that they came from the same source ( DVD silver? ) the same errors occur in both copies, the 20th century fox logo showing up on cd2 and the ending is cut off at exactly the same point in the graveyard scene.
quote:
Originally posted by Kane2k
*New* from Centropy.... MidgetVision(tm)
Now you too can enjoy the perspective of a midget while watching your favorite movies.
quote:
Originally posted by |Ware|Man
They ul nfo last with the password in it and then pre it so that there release doesnt get jacked by a lamer.. and i remember this happening once..
__________________
I Have This Thing, Advanced Dillusionary Schizofrenia with Involuntary Narcissistic Rage. It's No Big Deal.
NOX owned CTP on this one and as you can see the typical CTP fanboy's are defending this to their deaths. Let me guess, the angle isn't that noticeable right? LOL, only if you're blind as a bat. Picture is a tad sharper but it's plagued by that angle, grainyness, fast motion pixelation, excessive cropping, slight flickering, camcorder movement and sound isn't as good as NOX's imo. And to that guy who said why would anyone rate this below 5? Well, that's MY opinion of the quality. If I wanted to see this type of release I'd bring a fishbowl into the theatre and watch the film through it for similar effects but thank goodness there is already a BETTER version out. Shitty dupe, 5/7/7 Centropy's latest (besides some of thier almost FS releases) have been crap. I'm still pissed about CD2 of the highly acclaimed Hollywood Homicide release which was so damn dark and red I thought someone did commit a homicide when encoding that disc, it was like a murder scene.
CTP has not been the same ever since they came back to the scene and this just proves it, they can't be cocky anymore simply becase they dont put out the stuff to back them up, so CTP guys u better start following the rules 
as for the quality, i only saw thw sample so i'd sya it's a 6/6.5/8 the picture is a lot more angled they the others, such as T3.
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:58 PM. | Pages (5): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 » Show all 81 posts from this thread on one page |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.