VCDQuality Forums - Tomb Raider The Cradle Of Life - TELESYNC

Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 36 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Tomb Raider The Cradle Of Life - TELESYNC - ESOTERiC (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=24642)

Posted by Muzak on 07-27-2003 06:03 PM:

nice. pic is really good for the speed, and the sound is tolerable after jackin up the bass and putting my treble down to about the halfway point, very listenable (lol) after that.

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by pHo
ok, well in future when you join a community that is very anti-sellers, you really should choose a username that isn't going to cause confusion and annoyance. its like joinin an arabic forum with the name BUSHRULES because you like the australian outback.

Posted by Klonin on 07-27-2003 06:31 PM:

Sound sucks

After burning CDs the sound is terrible....using VCDGear to mpeg it is some what bearable.....

Needs some sound adjustments.....

Vid is watch able

Vid - 6
Sound - 3.5
Flix - 6 average sequel

Posted by frankwhite23 on 07-27-2003 07:12 PM:

not that bad it is watchable. but you have to give credit for the fastness of this release.

Posted by Ragin on 07-27-2003 07:19 PM:

It's Just ok.......

The picture is off to the side, color balance is on the mark but the contrast it bad, it looks cloudy, they didn't watch what they were doing there. The sound is not extreme, but very over modulated, and you will get some poppin, so I rate it at

6/4/8

Ragin

Posted by GeNeTiX on 07-27-2003 09:50 PM:

decent colour on video, nice and clean
little flickery, cropped a bit
sound is crummy. very tinny
6.5/5/x

__________________

Posted by Klonin on 07-27-2003 11:24 PM:

Re: Re: Sound sucks

:: Flame again, and you're gone. -K::

Posted by village_idiot on 07-28-2003 01:43 AM:

6/2/?

ACK! Audio could be easily fixed during transfer. Simply put a "t" pad on the inputs. Go to http://www.mcsquared.com/dbframe.htm and click on the T and H pad link. Sounds like they need about 30 to 40 db attenuation. Hopefully someone will get them the message.

Posted by pHizZ on 07-28-2003 01:44 AM:

The video on this release is very pixelated, and somewhat dark. Indeed, it is watchable, but it could be a lot better. Esoteric usually releases fast, but the quality is hardly ever up to par. I'm somewhat disappointed with this release. It's better than that UMS piece of shit, though. The audio is very tinny, and hollow; it could use more bass. Standard ESO release.

3/4/x

Posted by your name here on 07-28-2003 02:10 AM:

video is very good imo a lil dark though
audio is the killer its very loud and kinda hard to understand
movie blows~

8/5/3

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by deftones6

How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????

Posted by village_idiot on 07-28-2003 05:01 AM:

I found something very odd about this one. So I started looking into it. From the nfo:

quote:
CD1:39x15mb CD1:39x15mb
Aspect Ratio: 352x288

From the aspect ratio, this indicates a PAL release. Which is normal. I saw the parts of this "somewhere" as .rar-.r37 . One shy of what the nfo says. Also my player doesn't properly play PAL, so I need to convert to NTSC. No big deal. Upon loading it into the conversion software, I see that it is already converted to NTSC. First time I've seen this happen without someone making a notation of the change.

Are all the copies of this in NTSC? And could it be that the audio, and video got screwed by the person doing the conversion? Re-encoding would certainly explain why this video is at times lesser quality than it should be.

Just checked the sample. It too, has been converted.

Posted by Bazacko on 07-28-2003 07:02 AM:

7/4/?
Video is nice and sharp and the colors seem good
sound is terrible, can't understand speech when it's loud
I'll wait.

Posted by xxdjs715xx on 07-28-2003 04:34 PM:

very disappointed in the quality but glad 2 see it quick and 1 day after.

anyway heres what i think

video - 5 kinda foggy not the clearest picture and a lil bit of a angle but hardly noticeable.

sound - 2 its bad not clear sound very foggy sound , ums couldnt even do better

movie - no rating yet

Posted by params on 07-28-2003 09:57 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by pHizZ
The video on this release is very pixelated, and somewhat dark. Indeed, it is watchable, but it could be a lot better. Esoteric usually releases fast, but the quality is hardly ever up to par. I'm somewhat disappointed with this release. It's better than that UMS piece of shit, though. The audio is very tinny, and hollow; it could use more bass. Standard ESO release.

3/4/x

I'm with you all the way on this!

Unbearable as far as I'm concerned

Posted by wickedbull on 07-28-2003 11:42 PM:

Video- 7- Pretty good, little pixelation
Audio- 3- Can't understand shit
Movie- x- watch 2nite

Telesync my ass ;(

Posted by x757x on 07-29-2003 07:12 AM:

ugh

be nice if you could understand what they are saying.

video looks kinda pixelated to me, not too bad, not too good

audio , well, i think its been said, kinda sucks

thanks anyway.
liked the movie

6/4(telesync? you sure?)/8

Posted by towerblocks on 07-29-2003 10:12 AM:

i thought this was a piss poor release sat down to watch it an couldnt horrible pic an horrible scretchin sound eeee lol! i give it a 2 out a 10 all round

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:35 PM.

Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 36 posts from this thread on one page