Pages (2): « 1 [2] Show all 35 posts from this thread on one page |
VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Blade 2 - SCREENER - TEG-VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=3293)
i dont care if people bash TEG or or not, i dont like the attitude of people exspecting something dvdlike when a tagged screener is rlsed. movie companies tend to tag more and more because of the growing piracy, so guys have to live with it. if they dont like serails-blurs they should wait for dvdrip, but exspecting a tag free tape when there is none is plain idiotic.
right!
well usually tagged movies can be taken out because its usually put on the bottom of the screen, so tmpgenc comes along and you can easily remove it with the frames, now these screeners teg got scrolls all the way up like movie credits with alot of stupid gibberish like contacting the mpaa and the # and all......
maybe a different screener will come out somewhere else i dont know, maybe its the same everywhere else...i dont know
to me its no big deal because, i plan on going striaght to the source with the movies that are screeners right now, and thats when the dvd comes out, i have patience i guess
HAHA
Glad to see PenisXX is still doing the rounds, he always used to crack me up when i read before. Your bias is truly incredible, i dont think i've read you say a nice word about any one other than TEG ever!
I plainly refuse to download TEG as a moral issue. Im not going to bash them if i then watch and enjoy the film later on, im not a hypocrite. I guess this is TEGs one month of the year where they actually release semi decent stuff? Altho admittedly half of the releases are heading DVDwards soon anyway, I'd personally rather wait.
Keep replying PenisXX you keep me in stitches. The funny thing would be if you weren't a member, and were actually just a group whore. I really hope thats not true, cos thats really lame.
my opinion
yea the blur spot tend to be annoying but hey it's free
Well....
I've been reading the opinions posted here, so I thought I would give my unbiased view. This screener is average, yes the blurred tags are noticable, but not as bad as the usual black boxes, and personally after watching for a couple of minutes, I don't notice them (the same goes for subs on a movie)
To all of the people who are labeling this movie "shit" I'm really not sure where you are coming from. The quality is average for a screener, not great, not poor. It has blurs, but as other people have said, it says so on the NFO and you can clearly see them in the sample.
Maybe I am out of line in saying this, but it pisses me off when people complain about every little thing wrong with a release. Some people seem incapable of overlooking things and enjoying the movie, or the fact that it has been released at all for free. This movies is a tagged screener. There WILL be tags showing in some form. All you people want is perfect quality on every release, well I hate to be the one to break it to you, but if that were the case then there would be very little released at all.
Like the old cliche goes "It's free, stop bitching. If you don't like it, don't download it"
I was going 2 say something, but I cant be assed, apperantly im l33t and slagging TEG off, realy shows the mentality of some 1 dosent it.....
**EDIT**
BTW, stop saying its free, I think by now we all know this, hell all I said is that the 3 blur blocks made it unwatchable to me
y da hell yall flamin on teg. this rls is good its a screener. sorry to say for u centropy lovers but their rls of this sucked. it was blurry as hell. teg is awesome. i dont care about serialz i think next time they should jus leave em in. its prolyl less hassel on them to leave them anyways. well teg ownz all with screeners so those who r bitchin jus wait for centropy to rls the quality teg does. (which is never) ;-)
quote:
Originally posted by moviebootlegger
i dont care about serialz i think next time they should jus leave em in. its prolyl less hassel on them to leave them anyways.
Four words for MovieBootLegger: Sources and Law Enforcement. Think about it.
Haven't finished my d/l of this yet, but what the big deal with everyone bashing TEG. Hell they have had 10x releases of any other group in the last month and most are of fairly decent quality. If you don't like the blured serials then don't download the flippen movie. You can say you dislike them and that it lowers the quality of the movie, but other than telling how it affects the quality don't flame a group because you don't like how they operate especially when that is how they HAVE to operate. Sometimes I wonder how old some of you are. As of lately I would assume some of you to be no older than 10.
it was awite
i thought this rls was cool.. the movie was a lot more clear than previous ones, sound was good too. the only thing someone can complain about is the serial boxes.. which is not TEG's fault.. so yea.. good release.
and my opinion on the free thing.. they are not 'free' in the sense that bandwidth is money right?
one
No screener tags
I dont know but I think I have a better version that all of you.
One thing, I see no screener tags. The quality is blur like you say but I still see NO tags.
I guess I got mine from a different release group because I think the one I have is better.
Anyway, one good DAM movie!!!!!
-Odaiba
are the serials through the whole movie? i got the sample and they are all the way through the samples
Hmmm, is it me or is the movie kinda... shocky.
It isn't smooth, not on my dvd-player nor on the puter. Quality is ok, blurring the serials is a nice way to get rid of em... but the movie just doesn't play smooth. Anyone else with the same prob?
Blur Serials
Can someone explain what you mean by blur serials?
I dont see any serials on my copy. Is it because the serials are blurred?
-Odaiba
There are 3 blurry blocks in the release... top right, top left and on the bottom. Those HAD serials (or something) and they are blurred away hence the blurry/blurred serials
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:30 PM. | Pages (2): « 1 [2] Show all 35 posts from this thread on one page |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.