VCDQuality Forums - Johnson Family Vacation *PROPER* *SVCD* *NUKED* - TELESYNC

Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 49 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Johnson Family Vacation *PROPER* *SVCD* *NUKED* - TELESYNC - CoDE9 (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=39712)

Posted by [pr] on 04-17-2004 01:29 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by your name here
and SMR is not that bad guys compared to that shit group TMD : /

haha i just like to tease SMR, it's all good.

Posted by buddyslack on 04-17-2004 02:53 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by zangano
this is a kvcd reencode group

know them from phoenix torrents, made up mostly of kids that think they can call make a DVD from a TC (killbill)

they know crap about nothing but still claim to be able to make gold from shit.

being this a reencode makes it worst than being shit at the first place.

yes there a re-encode group, yes there a p2p release group, just cos they don't release things on topsites ect makes them shit?
code9 are a s/kvcd release group, watching this in media player is going to look shit, watching on a dvd player looks a hell of a lot better.

Now, i've seen this, and the orginal FTF version, of course going from the original FTF version and re-encoding is gonna loose quality, it's a simple fact of encoding, but, how people vote the audio worse than the original is stupid.

The audio on this release has taken out the hiss, the pops ect of the original release, yet people still vote it lower than the ftf original.

Also, this is a SKVCD release, I thought you guys didn't post these, but as this has hit so many topsites it has to be posted, a SKVCD release will look 10x better on tv than on a monitor.

Just cos you l33t guys don't think this is worth the effort to wipe your arse on don't mean it aint watchable, looking at your forum shows that people are interested in the s/kvcd format, and just cos all major release groups don't use it, don't mean it aint worth while.

Now the chances are this post is going to be ignored, just like the others (20 posts, but only 11 actual posts) but fuck all that. At the end of the day, whay not say, yes it's a re-encode give it DUPE status for that, and let it be. If people want to download it and watch on TV then so be it, if for you "top of the food chain" people don't like it, then fuck it and let everyone move onto the next thing. At leadt these managed to get a better score by re-encoding than UMS have gotten from coming out with there own source

now as zangano said this group comes from PT, originally there an ed2k group,then moved to BT, but also, they happen to have a release posted on here. Now I remember someone saying VCDQ don't list p2p groups, so.... what happened?

At the end of the day, this is a re-encode, normal people watching it, will say it looks better than the ftf version, (anyone watching it, will say it sounds better than the FTF version).

now this is especially to zangano, look at all the s/kvcd releases, now look at the only people who release to a consistantly high standard, the only group who release quickly with top quality. then look at the rest!

At least we made it here, with a shit ass quality nigger movie that no-one gave a shit about!!!!

:: edit- prick -M$

Posted by jratt on 04-17-2004 03:43 AM:

hey why all the hate for over a year these fellas at code 9 have been cleanning up the "crap" and making in watchable alsoas a member of PT i think you need to get your facs straight hammer or what ever your name is we are a class site dont hate the re-encoder hate the coder

__________________
the good egg clan

Posted by DOUGH on 04-17-2004 03:53 AM:

yes it's crap and a waste of bandwidth and from the sounds of it being a reencode group it should never have shown up here but..lets not bring down the KVCD encoders maybe if some ppl picked up some good KVCD encodes they'd show more love
crap crap and ummm..more crap

Posted by bluenova on 04-17-2004 04:32 AM:

y are there so many flame posts???

Code9 are the best releasers I know

:: lmfao. im letting all you pricks post then banning you. just so people can see what idiots you are. -M$

Posted by Nooitland on 04-17-2004 04:47 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by zangano
this is a kvcd reencode group

know them from phoenix torrents, made up mostly of kids that think they can call make a DVD from a TC (killbill)

they know crap about nothing but still claim to be able to make gold from shit.

being this a reencode makes it worst than being shit at the first place.

Better make gold from shit....as shit from gold...

i think code 9 do a great job...

they try to make from shit gold..for our pleasure

edit:: prick. - M$

Posted by Nooitland on 04-17-2004 04:51 AM:

I do wonder...if you ALL will ever relizes...that code9 do all for our pleasure??

I think...from all what i have seen...they are he best...

Go on code9....keep them going..

edit:: banned -M$

Posted by firefighter on 04-17-2004 04:59 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by CATBOX
code9 releases have never shown up on VCDQuality, as they are stricly a reencode group, and do not CAM their own stuff. Whoever posted it on this site is the one who labeled it Proper. They just tried to bring a better quality version to the scene of their supporters, and it should have never shown up on VCDQuality.

First , a silver is a silver is a silver - i know they dont cam it , they buy it

. They tried and screwed up bad - didnt they view this before releasing it , i feel sorry for the users. This is worse then FTF's copy. SVCD made it that much worse. It *did* ended up on vcdquality so now we get to comment on the quality ... crap.

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!

Posted by Bazacko on 04-17-2004 06:13 AM:

Wasn't Code9 an eDonkey rls spreading group? They used to download scene releases and spread them on eDonkey, taking credit for the real grp's work. In their NFO they have a reference to SimonMoon, who was the admin for sharereactor.com, where Code9 hung out. Is this their first real scene release?

__________________

Posted by jamie a. on 04-17-2004 06:58 AM:

Actually Code9 have cleaned up some very crap quality releases to a beautiful finished product. To blame a group like Code9 for something that was far inferior to begin with is somewhat uncalled for isn't it? At least they are out there doing something I get the feeling many of you probably lack the knowledge to do. If you could do a better job why haven't you?

Lay the blame where it belongs , at the feet of those who did such a poor job on the first place. Even they are at least attempting to get first release films out for others to criticize. Instead of slamming them one after the other like sheep , why not post something supportive to those groups who are actually doing the hard work? Show a little bit of individualism here and stop being such "elitists".

It's almost as though anyone who has over 10 posts here speaks and the majority follows suit. To those long time members who are at least keeping an open mind , you truly set a proper example for new members here. Keep up the encouraging and Code9 and others will continue to release excellent quality material for lemmings like some of these people to whine about.

Have any of those here who find taking pot shots at others ever even done an encode? An original rip? Even succesfully managed to burn a cd?

I'm not a member of Code9 either , just someone who appreciates the hard work and dedication of others who actually know what the term share means and sacrifice alot of their own downloading and systems to help others enjoyment. Judge Code9 on all their releases and not one file you think wasn't up to your lofty standards.

If this gets me banned as I suspect it will , oh well. I'd rather hang with "kids" than be a "cling-on" to someone who has a high post count but has nothing of real interest to say.

A Code9 fan! <--- edit: member - M$

Posted by bcool2k on 04-17-2004 09:35 AM:

Everyone has mentioned it.. I too unfortanately picks this up soon after pre and this was not only a waste of time and the movie not funny.. However, that's just the beginning of the problems with this movie...Video interlaced and cropped, shitty audio.. and NUKED, cuz this is NO PROPER... Sorry Code9, but your 1st rls on the scene was a complete failure and an unnecessary waste of time

2/2/3

Posted by Mystic Slippers on 04-17-2004 09:43 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by CATBOX
code9 releases have never shown up on VCDQuality, as they are stricly a reencode group, and do not CAM their own stuff.

Or in other words, a lame bunch of re-encode kiddies who take other peoples work for themselves don't put any effort in to sourcing things for their own releases at all and therefore deserve to be bashed.

Please. Shut the FUCK UP.

Posted by UltrA1 on 04-17-2004 09:58 AM:

bad all around

Posted by Mystic Slippers on 04-17-2004 11:05 AM:

If you gave a score of 5 or more for video or audio. You have now been banned. Although most of you are lame Code9 CHILDREN who have been banned anyway.

Do yourselves a favour and fucking kill yourselves.

Posted by damageandy on 04-17-2004 03:52 PM:

geatly improved on original. the jpeg u posted has been edited(by you). everyone who has said anything remotely positive has been banned and several posts have been removed, im sorry this place used to be respectable, u are bringing down every1 who releases anything, please cant u just at least not be bias

::edit - jpg edited by us? get a life. -M$

Posted by swiggler99 on 04-17-2004 04:40 PM:

I have not seen this encode BUT i have seen many other from CODE9 and have always found them to be of very good quality.
Is there some hidden reasoning behind this attempt to rubbish code9?
The comments made in this thread seem to vindictive to me

Posted by Whatwethink on 04-17-2004 06:57 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Mystic Slippers
If you gave a score of 5 or more for video or audio. You have now been banned. Although most of you are lame Code9 CHILDREN who have been banned anyway.

Do yourselves a favour and fucking kill yourselves.

Nice one Mystic Slippers.The people who have given this over 2 or 3 either,obviously have ties to the group,or are on seriously hard drugs.Come to think of it,it's probably both.

Posted by malignancy on 04-17-2004 08:42 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Mystic Slippers
If you gave a score of 5 or more for video or audio. You have now been banned. Although most of you are lame Code9 CHILDREN who have been banned anyway.

Do yourselves a favour and fucking kill yourselves.

smells like children... i hate children... also re-encoders... lame x3.14.......

Posted by optikalsaint on 04-17-2004 09:23 PM:

dl'd this copy just to see what the big fuss was about. this movie is crap, worse then the FTF release. the Code9 kids can get all uppity and say they cleaned this up and its 5x better but last time i check you can't polish a turd.

i also am not sure why a group would pride itself in re-encoding rls's from groups like FTF. nothing against FTF but if you were gonna do some re-encodes wouldn't you choose a better source? since the movie was rls'd here and i wasted time downloading it i might as well rate it

1/1/1

-opti-

Posted by cwg on 04-17-2004 09:53 PM:

uhhh, i watched the sample and it sucked, im just basically seeing if my post will even show up, have i been banned? i dont understand why my posts have never shown up?? what did i do?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:43 AM.

Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 49 posts from this thread on one page