VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 34 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- King Arthur - CAM - POT (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=42673)


Posted by Pickles on 07-09-2004 08:53 AM:

Just watched it ..is it me or does it seem to skip forward on a few scenes? Either way loved it. Now I want a nice TC of it

After watching the whole thing..
Audio 7
Video 6
Movie 9
Nice Jop POT


Posted by lozman on 07-09-2004 09:29 AM:

improvment on pots usual stuff not bad for such a early release keep im proving guys you're getting there

7/7/8


Posted by firefighter on 07-09-2004 04:03 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by dark101
Yup, i go with debo on this, its good, but not that good for anythin but a cam. If u don't like the audio on this get the thp rls


heh, ThP is a CAM also

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!


Posted by Movie_Insider on 07-09-2004 06:45 PM:

Thumbs up

very fast rls folks not bad for a cam 6/6/8 wish you folks had a good cam or a better cam person you guys ever start rls of ts you will start to blow videocd out of the water.


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 07-09-2004 07:34 PM:

my 2 cents

first off usually kick everything pots releases...but this is a nice cam...could have been fooled for a telesync nice quality pic and sound. Sound is not hollow as mention and doesn't have an echo..sounds like its direct...should have gotten higher ratings..

Good job for once pot..

7/7/?

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by DIVX~KVCD~SVC on 07-09-2004 07:42 PM:

Re: king arthur

[QUOTE]Originally posted by sut
[B]i see from your posts and vcd q this film is out but can u tell me where to find it as none of the sites i use have it please its the same with all the new films they are shown on here as out but i am unable to find would like any help thanks [QUOTE]



now i thought you were not supposed to ask where to get movies from on this sight. someone is not reading the rules....


Posted by d00d84 on 07-09-2004 08:08 PM:

bah, i usually dont bother with cams. even the most skilled of cammers cannot get the quality i am spoiled to have by dvds. but, i have watched this cam, and am impressed. Pot is getting better camming, much better. i can see a progression in skill from white chicks. .


Posted by bigmouse64 on 07-09-2004 09:10 PM:

Here's the image for quality.
http://www.digital-becoming.co.uk/hosting/members/bigmouse/King_Arthur_CAM-POT.jpg


Posted by Neversoft on 07-10-2004 02:02 AM:

Re: King Arthur Sample ?

quote:
Originally posted by bratt31999
I noticed some comments on the King Arthur Cam release that someone stated "judging by the sample" but I dont see any sample. Is there a sample here somewhere or was the sample viewed somewhere else ?
You should be asking this in the newbies section, but the "sample" is a 1min snippet of the movie that is distributed with the release - so you can quickly check the quality before downloading the full 1gb+ release...

... And no, you can't get em from this site and nobody is going to tell you where to get them either!

__________________
Statistically... 9 out of 10 people actually enjoy gang rape.


Posted by Movie_Insider on 07-10-2004 04:12 AM:

looks ok from sample what do you want from a cam 6/5/?
waiting for a tc or ts before watching the whole thing.


Posted by CC3o99 on 07-10-2004 08:27 AM:

Anyone else notice missing scenes on disk 2???? Good for a cam tho, but cant wait for the ts. Congrats on the fast rls, but shoulda been complete.


Posted by KLashNekkOff on 07-10-2004 04:07 PM:

looked forward to this film, so felt i just had to grab this first release even though it is a CAM. And i wasnt dissapointed

video - nice for a first rls, camera was held still throughout the entire film, maybe a slight tilt, but this was slight. Picture overall was decent, some pixellation particularly towards the end of CD2 and during the battlescenes, and the lightning effects are laughable, just white flashes on a CAM lol. Also was a bit dark, but it was still watchable.

audio - not bad, if this was in fact cam sound and not a TS then they have done a good job, a slight hollowness was present.

movie - had its ups and downs, i wanted to see this film so bad i just had to watch the cam but it may have been better if i had waited for a decent TS or TC. Nice battle scenes, particularly the ending one, but i have to say that could Arthur have been any more dreary and boring? hardly an inspirational war leader to me, like in legend. Historically inaccurate but still a good story and a decent film

6/7/7

__________________


Posted by cmjstota on 07-13-2004 10:30 AM:

Whole parts of the movie are missing. I havn't seen it yet but the whole battle on Ice where in the preview Lancelot says "There's a lot of lonely men out there" and then Gwenevere says "Don't worry I won't let them touch you and shoots and arros" is totally missing and where Arthur prays before battle and says "Guide my hand and Excalibur, I am ready" that's totally not there either heh. Good for a Cam I guess but cheated by missing about 20mins of the actual movie.


Posted by deusx on 07-15-2004 04:54 AM:

There's actually quite a bit of color on the scenes that have some, but the majority of the movie takes place in fog or at night, so everything usually is dark or has the "nighttime" blue tint to it. The movie is dreary but decent. You'd think a guy who pulled a magical sword out of a stone would get more respect. Too bad the movie is so generic. Change the references to Arthur and Merlin, etc, and the movie could be about any ol' band of knights fighting evildoers.

7/7/6. Solid cam, especially for a movie having dozens of people running around on the screen at the same time. I don't think I missed much from whatever scenes were cut. Good job, POT.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:49 AM. Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 34 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.