VCDQuality Forums - King Arthur - SCREENER

Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 32 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- King Arthur - SCREENER - VideoCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=47063)

Posted by JK1 on 09-23-2004 09:40 PM:

why do they insist on releasing crap ater the film as been out so long they should be getting better not worse!

Posted by overdrive on 09-23-2004 10:12 PM:

my riddick comment is ridiculously stupid? just to let u know the ira sell PDVDs on the markets in ireland... i just get em from him...videocds riddick is a tc.

Posted by infinityfsp2002 on 09-23-2004 10:33 PM:

HAHAHAHAH

Yes, VideoCD took a FS TC (???) and added a watermark to it so they could release a screener. That sounds really logical im sure.

__________________
iNFiNiTY

Posted by Redemption1980 on 09-24-2004 01:43 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by overdrive
my riddick comment is ridiculously stupid? just to let u know the ira sell PDVDs on the markets in ireland... i just get em from him...videocds riddick is a tc.

Im not doubting they do, you can make as much money selling Pirated software, Music and movies, as you can selling guns and drugs.

I have a TC of Riddick which is better than VideoCD's Screener, but its not the same source.

How is VideoCD's Riddick a TC, FS TC's are rare for a start, plus the pasting the Property of WHV is the funny part, as its Universal who distribute Riddick not Warner, plus there is not just that mark but some scrolling messages and a few B/W instances.

Why the fuck would VideoCD go to all the trouble to make a release irritating and hard to watch when they have a clean, watermark free source.

A bit of proof would be nice before you start throwing accusations, this release is shit and is inferior to the previous TC though.

edit: All, Sorry if ive went a bit off topic, but for some reason that wound me up

Posted by Rock4HYM on 09-24-2004 02:53 AM:

To be honest with you... I found this movie to be quite clear video and audio wise... personally most of the people that rated low in my opinion didnt even watch this film they just post to post... and don't even have the film. (Just my honest opinion)

8/9/9 rating

Posted by bcool2k on 09-24-2004 07:17 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by teo4all
the video is blurry,audio is better,movie sux,this release sux. I can honestly say STICK with the TELECINE...

5/7/3

I agree completely DVDR retail will be fairly soon..I can wait thanx aways VideoCD.

Posted by aWe on 09-24-2004 07:56 AM:

WTF is this crap?

__________________

IRC://IRC.EFNET.NET/VCDQUALITY
IRC://IRC.EFNET.NET/prolifeabortionists
"@Dwaggy · pirates are hella kinky
Avenue_1 · how do u know this?
@Dwaggy · i'm a pirate"

Posted by overdrive on 09-24-2004 06:53 PM:

i dont know y they did it and tbh i dont really care im just trynna point out that videocd are mislableling their sources

Posted by StYlEz_P on 09-24-2004 09:36 PM:

umm why !!! stick with the tc folks but thanks anyway videocd judging on cd1 7/8/4 some liked this movie and some hated it and im kinda in between them both .. it had its moments but kinda got bored and fell asleep so ya

Posted by Dodgy Del on 09-25-2004 12:34 AM:

just wondering mate if you had cataracts as the version i watched was utter SHITE. how can you say it was quite clear?
time for a visit to the opticians.

Hope this is a one of from a group who were once rulling the scene.

quote:
Originally posted by Rock4HYM
To be honest with you... I found this movie to be quite clear video and audio wise... personally most of the people that rated low in my opinion didnt even watch this film they just post to post... and don't even have the film. (Just my honest opinion)

8/9/9 rating

__________________
Lets praise all the groups out there who make this scene for what it's worth because if we didn't then we'd all be spending a fortune at the pics.Remember to practice SAFE SEX (as illistrated in the pic).

Posted by Rock4HYM on 09-25-2004 07:32 AM:

it was clear as I said after the first minute... looked like any other vhs screener ive seen out there. I personally dont see the big deal it was blurry for a minute then went to near perfect quality.

Posted by soeazy2004 on 10-01-2004 12:48 AM:

6.6.7

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:19 AM.

Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 32 posts from this thread on one page