VCDQuality Forums Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 45 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Spider-Man - SCREENER - THCiSO (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=4795)


Posted by drbobsevilweb on 07-11-2002 10:19 PM:

Thumbs down

Stick with the ctp one,even with its glare problems it still beats this one.

And the black and white thing gets annoying as does the poor encode.


Posted by drbobsevilweb on 07-11-2002 10:21 PM:

Yep definaely stick to ctp's one as this is not that good, the encoding is quite bad on it and even though it is a screener the telesync looks of higher quality and doesn't go black and white either.


Posted by SpitFire on 07-11-2002 11:04 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by drbobsevilweb
Stick with the ctp one,even with its glare problems it still beats this one.

And the black and white thing gets annoying as does the poor encode.



quote:
Originally posted by drbobsevilweb

Yep definaely stick to ctp's one as this is not that good, the encoding is quite bad on it and even though it is a screener the telesync looks of higher quality and doesn't go black and white either.



Did you just refer to yourself while choking on ctp cock or maybe you forgot too change your name. Stupid kid!


Posted by champmeister on 07-12-2002 12:00 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by drbobsevilweb
Yep definaely stick to ctp's one as this is not that good, the encoding is quite bad on it and even though it is a screener the telesync looks of higher quality and doesn't go black and white either.


Do you just pretend to be stupid? Or are you born that way? You obviously dont know a damn thing about encoding do you? Very disturbing


Posted by philly b on 07-12-2002 12:06 AM:

moviebootlegger, i dont suck centropy dick, fuck them for all i care. but there release was better, video and audio.

you can get back on THCiSO's cock now. :P


Posted by rappa on 07-12-2002 04:09 AM:

Here ill put this in terms all u lil dalnet newbies know...Its a PURE SCR, no CTP'S is not nearly as good, The black and white happens 5times throughout the movie for about wat, 5 fucking seconds. Its not no fucking telesync neither, if it was you wouldnt see advertisements..CTP RGB wasnt correct on this rls neither..a lil too much blue still and had big glare problems. Try watching samples on ur damn dvd players, then u see quality or not, not on ur pcs that have like onboard video and onboard sound cuz u wouldnt get shit out of that. This byfar beats any release and for all u dick sucking fags out there, get a life.


Posted by the_sorcerer on 07-12-2002 04:17 AM:

NUKED

This is a Centropy release. You can see a little of the boom mic at the top and was cropped for this scr release they say. Also you can see the Twin Towers on Spider Man's reflection on his mask and I'll be the final version won't show that.


Posted by moviebootlegger on 07-12-2002 04:43 AM:

RIGHT ON RAPPA!!!!!!!!!!


Posted by the_sorcerer on 07-12-2002 04:45 AM:

NUKED

it's a centropy release. you can see boom mic at the top a little and was just cropped out. also you can see the twin towers on spiderman's reflection on his mask towards the end of cd1.


Posted by ctrl+alt+del on 07-12-2002 04:50 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by DABhand
IMHO this screener is more like a TS, not so good playback. Yep the CTP rls is far better.


hmm i must be under the wrong impression, i thought that the ctp rls was a TS.

anyways man all you 12 year olds here that have loyalty to a group cause you love giving them head need to wake up and look at quality, yes there have been bad encodes of screeners but this one is decent, and a ts is a ts, i have yet to see any ts that was worth watching, yes including ctp, a ts is just a fancy cam, i dont want to hear you 12 year old bitching about quality when you watch ts's, oh and to get back to the subject at hand you have to be a total retard (or color blind and inept to quality) if you think that the ctp rls is better. and that is not my opion but fact.

ah here come the flames of people with ctp's cock up their ass, oh and i dont care about thciso, yes they have done some great work but im not group loyal i just go after quality so dont make a lame comeback at oh i suck thciso's cock or whatever.


Posted by DABhand on 07-12-2002 05:33 AM:

1. We know its from a VCR/DVD copy, but the encode is close to similar as a TS. And I did watch on DVD player and I still think CTP is better rls

2. Grow up, why you guys obsessed with cock sucking, cant get enough of it or something?

3. Anyone from PR gonna fix an old account I had with ya, I know a couple scour this forum where are ya guys?


Posted by Orky on 07-12-2002 06:37 AM:

This seems to be a nice release, just watched the samples.

And guess what... The aspect ratio changes from CGI scenes and normal scenes.

So to all of you who complained about CTPs release changing

Ohh, and yeah, I prefer this one over CTPs.

2 Cds, much better color

__________________
,,|,, ^_^ ,,|,,
DISCLAIMER:
When I write "Havn't seen it yet" in a moviereview about a new release I mean that I havn't seen the whole movie, only the sample.
"Written to avoid accusations of only judging by jpg"


Posted by Starscreamer on 07-12-2002 06:57 AM:

Yep, I agree. This rls is much better than CTP's. The only problem I have with it is it's a little blocky. I know there's a way to clean that up, but I'm not too skilled in that department yet. I did post something about it in the new section (encoding help/questions). I'm not dogging anyone here, while CTP's rls was very good for a telesync, I've been waiting for a screener for a while, and now I have it. And thank god it's only 2 CDs!!


Posted by Skippy_2002ca on 07-12-2002 08:40 AM:

OK

OK people Centercopys Sucked IT was Way to bright The Bass On the Movie Was Way to loud man And IT plane Old Kicked the Bucket IT was a Ok realse At the Time KNow We See a SCreener Perfect and IT may have a LIl Black and White At times But IT beats the SHit Out OF the CTp realse All you people Posting that the CTP realse OF this Flick IS better Gotta Get OFF CTPS Cock Wtf I am SIck OF this SHit A group Does Better and You sit THEre OHH the Centercopy (TS) Was Way better Then THE {SCREENER}
Fuck Shut Up and Thank This Group For Coming Out With Somethign Better then CTp they Did IT Just Like Many groups Beat Others Out the Wall Enjoy this Film people It is A Great Scr..

__________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted BY kjeks

Where the heck do i get .cue files for this thing?


lol


Posted by DGR on 07-12-2002 01:54 PM:

ok, after all those constructive and useful comments I thought I'd add one of my own. This release is a decent one, nice screener... nice vcd. The thing does look blocky when played on my standalone dvd-player, which is pretty normal when a vcd is played fullscreen. The bw-fading is not annoying me at all, the 4 times or so it happens for less then 10 seconds are not disturbing. If this one is better then the ctp release? Dunno, hard to tell... One thing to keep in mind is that this is a 2cd vcd, the ctp release is a 3cd svcd. Ofcoz the ctp has better image, as in less blockiness. The source from this one is better tho as far as I'm concerned... I wish they had made a 2/3 cd svcd from it...

Both releases have their pros and cons.

ctp: good pic/sound (for a ts anywayz) but well... a TS
thciso: good source, mediocre pic/sound (hell, it's a vcd). I think this one would be better for a small screen/watching on the puter and the ctp might be better for a full screen/standalone dvd-player. I bet that if thc-iso had made a svcd from this it would beat ctp to the bone.

Well, that was it... I wonder how many "u suck thc-cock in hell", "eat ctp arse", "lame kiddie 12 yo" replies I'll get


Posted by drbobsevilweb on 07-12-2002 02:08 PM:

No im not expert at encoding but all i meant was that there are visible jagged lines around the actors when seen from a distance and it does get blocky.

I don't think CTP are that good, I think there starwars was quite unwatchable on the first CD due to the glare.

ps

I tried to delete my second post - but vcdquality wasn't having any of it.

- only admin/mods can delete posts - pHo


Posted by jedialphaknight on 07-12-2002 09:15 PM:

decent release I played it in my dvd player, kinda blocky which is kinda annoying how bad was that pdvd release from DUST ?


Posted by svenbob on 07-12-2002 10:50 PM:

Look, let me say my 2 cents. This release is definatly better than the Centropy one. But for the people who continuasly bitch about Centropy lovers, understand that Centropy was a good group, much better than any other TS group out at the moment, so people liked them because they released good shit. I liked them, and If they started releasing again I'd still like them. But they're gone right now and yeah that sucks, but damn stop whining about it. They arent gonna come back because you bitch on VCDQ forums.

Now, Just because someone like's CTP's releases doesn't mean they're sucking they're dick or blah blah whatever flaming answer you want to give. Of course we're tired of hearing about it, call them out for that, but not for liking on of the best TS groups there are.

Now you heard my 2 cents.

-svenbob

__________________
One time, my cousin Walter got this cat stuck in his ass. True story. He bought it at our local mall so the whole fiasco wound up on the news, it was embarrassing for my relatives and all, but the next week he did it again, different cat, same results, complete with another trip to the emergency room! So I run into him a week later in the mall and he’s buying another cat and I says to ‘em "Jesus Walt, what are you doing? You know your just gonna get this cat stuck up your ass too, why don’t you knock it off?" And he says to me "Brodie, how the hell else am I supposed to get the gerbil out?" My cousin was a weird guy....

-


Posted by Pepperoni on 07-13-2002 12:02 AM:

Well i haven't watched the Centropy release yet, so im just judging it as it is...not comparing to any other releases

Video: 8
Audio: 9

Video was good, beginning and ending had a few glitches [were only a few seconds] and i didn't really like the black and white+message parts, even though they are a mere 10 seconds or so, but still, just my opinion.

Audio was pretty good, not really much to complain on that part.


Posted by Canibust on 07-13-2002 05:51 AM:

i personally dont know anything about encoding or anything like that, but all you guys that fight about who sucks the most dick from whichever rls group are fucking stupid. Just comment on the fucking release itself and dont bring all these other rls groups in it.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:20 PM. Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 45 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.