VCDQuality Forums Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 45 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Alexander - TELESYNC - FRA (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=50846)


Posted by AddNtoX on 11-27-2004 10:05 PM:

Re: Pointers

quote:
Originally posted by Sh1z
Glad to see the picture is nice, audio is great....POT should take pointers from some better up and coming groups like FRA. Glad to see quality isnt long gone out the scene.....quality was always better than quantity....


7 / 9



err going on FRA's track record i think ur a lil ahead of urself there bud, go back to bit torrent


Posted by JuJuJigga on 11-27-2004 11:05 PM:

Hmmmm the source for FRA is even better then POT. So I dont think they used POT video. This release is much better then POTs. Audio is 10x better. It still doesnt make a bad movie good


7/8/3


Posted by Miller on 11-27-2004 11:11 PM:

Re: Pointers

quote:
Originally posted by Sh1z
Glad to see the picture is nice, audio is great....POT should take pointers from some better up and coming groups like FRA. Glad to see quality isnt long gone out the scene.....quality was always better than quantity....


7 / 9



huh???

what are you talking about? their video quality is almost always teh same, they both use silvers sources, sound quality of pots release and FRA's releases of cams are about the same, and they both put DTS releases out, and POT only fucked up one DTS release, and FRA tried to encode their LAST few as SVCD, when their wasen't the quality for it, so they ended up being gross, but they got this one right!!

__________________
Straight out of karate Lessions, to register these hands as wepons!


Posted by keam on 11-28-2004 12:23 AM:

Thumbs up

not bad......


Posted by firefighter on 11-28-2004 08:50 AM:

i dunno how anyone can vote 7 or higher for the picture on this;

Picture - Very Very blurry , theres while lines all over the picture that run horizontal throught the whole movie, the colors are crap and bleeding , all cams/telesyncs yes are cropped to some degree but this copy is very very cropped.

Sound - I didnt see any sync issues , nicly sync'd direct audio

I tried to watch this copy but 1/4 the way through CD1 , i deleted. Movie looks like shit so i aint going to theater to watch it, ill wait more likley for a screener to see this movie .. not in any rush. As for FRA's copy , its watchable ... barley.

5/8/?

__________________
All the excitement of a trip to hell with none of the negitive side affects!


Posted by Icedog on 11-28-2004 05:38 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by firefighter
i dunno how anyone can vote 7 or higher for the picture on this;

Picture - Very Very blurry , theres while lines all over the picture that run horizontal throught the whole movie, the colors are crap and bleeding , all cams/telesyncs yes are cropped to some degree but this copy is very very cropped.

Sound - I didnt see any sync issues , nicly sync'd direct audio

I tried to watch this copy but 1/4 the way through CD1 , i deleted. Movie looks like shit so i aint going to theater to watch it, ill wait more likley for a screener to see this movie .. not in any rush. As for FRA's copy , its watchable ... barley.

5/8/?



As you can see in the source file, you know why they cropped it so much.


Posted by vcdking24 on 11-28-2004 08:23 PM:

wouldnt be that bad if it werent for all the wavey lines going through it. the lines are really a distraction, plus its a little dark, sound is ok but slightly off sync.


Posted by Da Postman on 11-28-2004 08:28 PM:

Not sure if this video deserves a 7 rating. The colors are nice, but the video is grainy and not clear. The sound is very good and to be honest, this is the best version we have available to us. Thanks for your support FRA and it is appreciated.

V-6.5
A-8
M-7


Posted by a1catraz on 11-28-2004 09:19 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by vip3r
Picture is ok, looks overcropped to me. Very blurry, too dark, could be brighter and have more vibrant colors. Good audio, not the best i've heard, but i still don't think this release does this movie it's justice. Sure it may suck, but that might be because it's a 3HR movie, and watching a sorta crappy version makes it hard to actually enjoy it. I myself, am going to see this in the theater..thanks for the great effort FRA. Each movie you guys release..the quality seems to improve. Just what we need, another quality TS group..keep up the good work FRA

6/7/?

::edit:: now that i think about it, CD1 is about 636MB, CD2 is about 627MB, and CD3 is about 454MB. Considering this movie IS three hours long, yes - three hours..don't you think each CD should be about 800MB for the best possible quality? I do..and i'm definately going to pass on this release now that i have thought about this.



what are you, stupid?
its vcd, and not SVCD.
therefore SIZE is smaller.


Posted by bcool2k on 11-29-2004 05:16 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by 3FaCE
lol im confused. if a group releases semi-good video (POT) and semi-good cam audio (POT) why shouldn't a group be able to come along and IMPROVE on the sound??? I mean come on. If POT can't get DTS than why not let FRA get it for them?? Makes sense to me....I mean THEATRE QUALITY DTS? Or cam quality?? Pretty easy decision there...

As for this release
Video--7
Audio--8
Movie--dunno really...reviews have made it out to be another Troy (aka shite).



POT has axx to DTS sound as do all groups...IE TS POT releases just Cam pic with a DTS track...All groups have the DTS part.. a good cammer is the difficult part and neither POT or FRA provide their own video source...Its basically what u buy off the streets with a re encode and DTS added..ANd this is 100% the truth..PROPS to NYC and Asia for the releases. ENJOY!!


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 11-29-2004 08:02 AM:

good stuff..not the best pic, but audio is right on and looked better on the television..

7/8/8 movie was actually good just too damn long...and when did 26year old Angelina Jolie look old enough to have Colin ...

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by deztroyer on 11-29-2004 08:31 AM:

Thumbs up

You guys talk to much about how its stolen source and all this other crap, that some of you forget to rate the movie and some of you dont even say anything like 7/8/9.. You guys just say looks good and thats it.

video is ok
sound is good
movie is kind of boring

6/8/5 <--------some of you forget about this

rate the release


Posted by ant on 11-29-2004 09:09 AM:

rls is pretty descent...not to bad a lil blurry but definately watchable...sound is very nice ...as for movie i only seen a lil of it so far but it looks very interesting...overall a very nice rls..good job fra!


Video-6.5
Audio-8.5
Movie-?


Posted by dc_man on 11-29-2004 05:00 PM:

This movie is a piece of shit..

6/6/5

__________________
My sig worked, It's back.


Posted by mandrex on 11-29-2004 05:17 PM:

Thumbs up D'oh!

Just watched disc 1 ; the DTS is killer and the pic is very good! Serious PROPS to FRA...
8/8/8
I liked it. There were some noticable wavy lines in the very begining but after that nothing to distract from the movie. Color was good and not dark where it shouldn't have been.... some of you are way picky or your re-coding needs work.... I got mine from EN; using RAR 3.0. Burned using Alch 1.4 on TDK CDR with NEC 3500.
TURN IT UP!!! wow.


Posted by Panthera37Mal on 11-29-2004 05:33 PM:

the audio is pretty good, but the pics is blurry and blocky

so i guess u can rate this a so so copy

not the best out there , but good as it gets for the time being


Posted by Lord_Gandalf on 11-29-2004 10:20 PM:

Re: Re: Alexander

quote:
Originally posted by TheReal_Kaitain
Well, well, well, judging by your post you didn't even bother to WATCH the torrent before commenting on it. A sample does not count.

Please don't voice an opinion on something you haven't seen. This is a huge problem, how many people vote on bills without even reading them. Don't be part of the problem, be part of the solution. Think before you speak, watch the torrent before you give an opinion about it.





You.... define idiot.

__________________
Spitball Admin
http://www.spitballcinema.com


Posted by mikethomey on 11-30-2004 03:24 AM:

by far this is fra's best and noone can deny that, sure its got those lines but when you sit back and watch it they arent even really noticeable, unless you use a 50" flatscreen i guess lol. the sound was very nice except for a few scenes where certain things were much louder then anything else...other then that great job!

7/8.5/8


Posted by CiC on 11-30-2004 04:42 AM:

Decent release. Picture is a little blurry but very watchable, sound is great.
Unfortunately the movie sucked ass it was very inaccurate. You'd suspect these people to know the facts if they are doing a historical movie.

Oh well, if you're dying to see it this release will be nice for ya to get If you are patient you can always wait for a svcd-version

6/8/2


Posted by rivaldo on 11-30-2004 05:58 PM:

medium wuality....don't like the picture....although nice sound....
6/8/???want to watch
i hope an svcd ts will come out but nothing yet.... maybe there wont be any svcd ts like national treasure...bacause the vcd ts suppose to have good quality...what u think???


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:53 PM. Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 45 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.