VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 39 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Fat Albert - TELESYNC - POT (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=52558)


Posted by THE_EVOLUTiON on 12-29-2004 07:12 AM:

Really guys, who gives a damn about where the movies are from, if ur ranting - do a better job urself.

As for the Sample, nice quality, way to go POT.


Posted by CANES1 on 12-29-2004 08:52 AM:

Wow the mods must be on vacation. All these posts discussing groups and no bitching about it from them.

A dumb question: How come the ratings for both Fat Albert releases say N/A?

It would be just like them to ignore those posts and ban me instead.

:: I can grant that wish for you. -K::


Posted by 404notfound on 12-29-2004 12:21 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by CANES1
Wow the mods must be on vacation. All these posts discussing groups and no bitching about it from them.

A dumb question: How come the ratings for both Fat Albert releases say N/A?

It would be just like them to ignore those posts and ban me instead.



It was broken at the time. Should be fixed now.... as for the other matter *cough*


It looks like since these have stopped being posted you've all reverted back to your previous ways. Soooooooooooo PAY ATTENTION!

IMPORTANT, PLEASE READ

1 NO REQUESTING MOVIES OR SAMPLES

2 DO NOT DISCUSS WHERE TO DOWNLOAD MOVIES OR SAMPLES

3 NO FLAMING

4 NO "SPOILERS"

5 COMMENT ON THIS RELEASE, NOT WHAT OTHER GROUPS MAY OR MAY NOT RELEASE

6 ONLY COMMENT IF YOU HAVE SEEN THIS RELEASE OR A SAMPLE OF IT

7 DO NOT COMMENT ON ME POSTING THE RULES

*** PEOPLE IGNORING THE ABOVE RULES WILL BE BANNED ***

__________________


Posted by Truth on 12-29-2004 01:13 PM:

quote:
If you ask me Matines should have been labeled TS instead of CAM it was great strong audio.

wow thats an incredibly late entry into the dumb post of the year competition...a TS is DIRECT audio it's not a yardstick of quality.
V 7
A 8
F ?


Posted by towell on 12-29-2004 01:56 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Truth
wow thats an incredibly late entry into the dumb post of the year competition...a TS is DIRECT audio it's not a yardstick of quality.
F ?



Lmfao! I just had to sign up to comment on that! :P It's hard educating people in here :P

Any way..

6.5/8/* (aint watched it all yet)


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 12-29-2004 03:09 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Truth
wow thats an incredibly late entry into the dumb post of the year competition...a TS is DIRECT audio it's not a yardstick of quality.
V 7
A 8
F ?



That shows how immature you are kid. Obviously the comment was stating that it sounded very direct, I know the difference between a TS and a CAM. So please keep your ignorance to yourself, but if it makes your balls feel more swollen to make comments on someone else's post go right ahead. Either release is equally good.

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by Miller on 12-29-2004 05:45 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by HypoLuxa
First off….



There are such things as Pre-Sites you know.




um thats why i said the Release only Pre'd like a 10min after he posted!..u should have read the post

__________________
Straight out of karate Lessions, to register these hands as wepons!


Posted by snozzler29 on 12-29-2004 09:19 PM:

video was fuckin awfull

video was realy blocky and fuzzy in places and also very grainy

audio was pretty decent

film isnt been watched untill better is available

video 4

audio 7

film not watched


if you watch this on your pc your eyes will hurt

if you watch this on your standalone you are a mug for wasting the cds or dvdr if u convert


Posted by Da Postman on 12-29-2004 09:37 PM:

The movie has good sound, the picture is washed and dark all around the edges. Still, it's the only version out and might just stay this way. I don't care how POT gets it and it's crazy to want groups to, "COME CLEAN." Let's be happy we can watch the movie on our time and that someone else put the effort to give it to us.

V-6.5
A-7
M-7


Posted by StanTek on 12-29-2004 10:13 PM:

I waited this long for this!!!!

Video: 6.5
Audio: 7.5
Movie: 8


StanTek


Posted by ant on 12-30-2004 01:34 AM:

i just watched this on my standalone...and the quality was'nt that bad....the picture was a lil dark around the edges and colors were a little washed out but overall quality of the picture was pretty clear..it was'nt blocky at all as stated in previous posts...sound was very nice...movie was pretty good...overall quality...very watchable rls..and i don't care where it came from..props to pot on speed and pretty descent quality of rls.



Video-7
Audio-8
movie-8


Posted by Debo on 12-30-2004 04:27 AM:

6/8
movie looks like shit

__________________


Posted by norgy on 12-30-2004 04:35 PM:

7/8/?


Posted by mikethomey on 12-30-2004 07:42 PM:

not Pot's best but still very watchable if you dont have your face planted to the screen

6/8/8

as for this whole same source as Matine stuff....dont be silly and get your sources straight

matine's has more color, and a higher bitrate then the PoT version, they are even cropped differently.....i mean all these paragraphs on this topic and the topic itself is in question lol....silly noobies

who cares if they buy the silvers on the street; but stop thinking that there is only one type of silver(which gotta be the most ignorant thought of all)


Posted by jp77 on 12-31-2004 10:22 AM:

this is the best and absolutely best telesync pot has released keep them coming pot i enjoyed this release very much and for the ppl who gave this release a low rating stop judging evrything from the sample and watch it on a dvd player you'll get a better look at what your judging

pic...8.5

audio...9

movie...7


Posted by Bravo on 01-01-2005 04:40 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by jp77
this is the best and absolutely best telesync pot has released keep them coming pot i enjoyed this release very much and for the ppl who gave this release a low rating stop judging evrything from the sample and watch it on a dvd player you'll get a better look at what your judging

pic...8.5

audio...9

movie...7



This post is one of the resons i don't even pay attention to the votes in here anymore. I watched the full release and have to wonder what you were watching. The pic was so bright it hurt your eyes. Making the brightness even worse was the picture was dark around the edges. Also it was blocky and cropped a good bit. If you remove all these things then it would be a 8.5.

My rating

pic-6

audio-9

movie-7.5(cool family flick).


Posted by nobby1701 on 01-03-2005 04:11 AM:

Doesn't ANYONE rate on seeing the WHOLE movie? The sample looked fine. What's the point of rating the movie on just the sample though? I've only read ONE review that had anything to do with the movie available--the rest is garbarge about but kissing to particular people putting out the releases--no one cares--we just want to see if the movie is worth the download/worth wasting cd's on.

The first half hour or so of the first cd looked fine, if a little light/washed out. Then it all went to crap. Blocky pic, distortion, not watchable. If more folks had WATCHED the movie before giving their "expert opinions", I'd have known that I had to wait for a better release.

[EDIT:: This site is called VCD >>QUALITY<< which is what you should be rating, so use the sample if you want (it's not always the most accurate, but it gets the ratings posted quicker). I agree though that if somebody hasn't actually seen the whole release, they should only rate the video and audio and not the whole movie though - Neversoft]


Posted by thedoors on 01-10-2005 07:38 PM:

got this its a funny film an quality not bad

v 7
a 6.5
m 8

more of the same guys


Posted by dlink on 01-11-2005 04:28 AM:

Video is very unique, if you really want to see this, by all means, it's a solid, POT TS. I don't see anyone losing sleep over releasing this, so this may be the copy to keep for a little bit. Audio is very nice, a tad low. The picture looks dark, the reason people are complaining that it's too bright is the contrast of the characters costumes. They are meant to be technicolor ben-hur style colors, not neutral, camera-easy colors. It's an over the top film, don't expect too much. Picture looks 'dirty' due to this, but overall, it's a very solid release. POTs been putting it down lately.

And BTW, these forums are hilarious, the BS ratio in ratings is like 1 to 13 posts. Please collectively save folks' bandwidth and rate the film, not stroke your scene penis. I don't think that's what the admins had in mind when building this site.


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:44 PM. Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 39 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.