VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Be Cool - TELESYNC - STN (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=56281)


Posted by Zipomatic on 03-06-2005 09:06 PM:

I was looking at the comments here thinking that as usual people were being way too harsh on a release (which is usually the case) so I took a look at this one. Seems you are all right. Pic is washed out, it IS watchable but only if you are desperate.

I can't figure the sound. It should be good with this release being a TS and all, but man... it sounds muffled almost, and on CD2 a buzz comes into play which gets so loud you can't hear the audio on the movie. Not good at all.

Video - 4
Audio - 3
Movie - Supposed to be bad, but we'll see eh?


Posted by deelite on 03-07-2005 12:19 AM:

Yikes.
Wait for a better one.
If you can't wait for a better copy, I guess this one will do.


Posted by weedchemist on 03-07-2005 05:20 AM:

hmm???

ok grabbed the sample a few hours ago and im not quite sure what went on with this one, but the contrast is all whacked and color saturation needs to be turned up and adjusted with the contrast, i turned my friends, usually dark monitor down about 3/4 way and it didnt look too bad, some1 had said it looks like an old bootleg and id have to agree, but im not sure if thats the silver that was so bad, or the encoding, cuz 2 me it looks like alot of the haze over the film is added by encode problems... oh well, as for the audio hmm the sample was bad and ppl said it gets worse toward the end..? wow shoulda had some filters, as it sounds like a rusty headphone jack or something... eitherway this is a 1st rls, take it and do some adjustments in an encode prog and u may have a 1/2 way watchable rls, but not in its present state... 4/5/? <-wanna see but not this 1


Posted by Wehrmacht on 03-07-2005 11:17 AM:

The horror... the horror.

I wonder if the cammer hid the camera in a plastic shopping bag while he filmed?

V - 2
A - 3
M - Turned it off in disgust. Not at the movie itself, mind you.


Posted by Da Postman on 03-13-2005 09:36 AM:

Finally able to download cd1. I was hoping this would be better than all the ratings. Most raters have a habit of giving lower scores than I feel is correct. Over the past 2 years, I've noticed a slant toward groups in one direction or another. That's OK, but this one I couldn't believe it was rated so low. Well, they are pretty damn correct here. I can't believe how the camera is so good on the spot with little cropping. All of it for waste, the video is very washed and it is hard to see. I think the colors could've been very good, but the white film over the screen destroys it. The sound has a hum throughout the disk. I could've handle this, but not with the bad video. How can they not encode this release again and lose such a top movie to this mistake?

V-3.5
A-5 (better than cam, but not saying much)
M-3


Posted by darrenw on 03-13-2005 08:37 PM:

not worth a d/l film un-watchable. wait few days untill ANYTHING else comes out 2/3/? this is why every1 hates cams?


Posted by lindoors on 03-19-2005 04:14 PM:

This was like watchin those TMD movies all over agian.total crap .waste of SHOT this was.... Terrible Audio.video is washed OUT.My 2 year old could have done a better job recording this/


Posted by Da Youngloada on 03-21-2005 05:09 PM:

What the uff is this?????????
Word of Advice. STN stop embarrassing yourself. You either have good quality or you dont. Stop releasing Shit

Stunner 1 Prodz


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:39 AM. Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 28 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.