VCDQuality Forums Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »
Show all 62 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Ring Two - TELESYNC - STN (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=60469)


Posted by pop0331 on 03-20-2005 12:00 AM:

4/5/6

went to see in theatre yesterday, wasn't bad wasn't great, just ok


Posted by MarketMakerz on 03-20-2005 12:19 AM:

The.Ring.Two.TS-STN
video = not good, but not un-watchable; its dark, grainy, snowy, same style as the Robots rls few days ago, but darker and a bit better.
audio= constant soft static; just during the opening scene...as the initial music comes in...its ok, then once the bass kicks in, huge static vibrations (imagine the sound of a cracking fire).

Rest of the film...unknown quality.

During the first few minutes, huge problem:
the mom and the kid are in a quiet scene at the kitchen table. Mom has a shirt and vest on; then thump, the sound of someone turning off a button; audio goes completely dead-silent for ~1min 20 secs; video continues on and they are still in the kitchen; then hard-break, audio is back; it jumps to a different scene; where the mom has a coat on and is inside a dark garage

(unknown number of minutes missing there :-(


Posted by davey_fl on 03-20-2005 12:35 AM:

seriously this rlz quality bites donkey cock, but good job getting it out so quickly


Posted by booboo32 on 03-20-2005 12:45 AM:

think this man saya it all

vid=4
audio=3


Posted by Heph on 03-20-2005 12:54 AM:

4/4/5

Several probs with this rls as stated .. there won't be alot of
good dts out fast until someone cracks these .aue dts2 files.
Until then it's play on HW and re-capture or find a source like a
handicap jack.

__________________
Heph (Hephaestus)


Posted by yucatan on 03-20-2005 01:25 AM:

yea a better release than usual from stn good job for the bit improvement! sound goes dead at minute 8 sec 13 for about 1 minute and you can hear the audio wires being put back it sounds pretty loud. There is a scene missing but its like 1 1/2 minutes i think in that time sequence same as when the audio turns off, i saw it yesterday opening day so im guessing its that long so definately a direct source of audio. A very unfair nuke but probably the nukers hang out with saosin or oracle haha!


Posted by concius on 03-20-2005 01:26 AM:

from sample

some what anticipating this movie for the scare factor. audio has a high hiss/crackle to it. video is grainy and rather dark.
again from the sample, id wait for a better rls. nice work STN on the quick release.

video 3.0
audio 2.0
movie ?


Posted by Puma on 03-20-2005 01:52 AM:

at frame 14697/8 till frame 17150 there is absolutely no sound, as was mentioned before..... it should be nuked for this reason, not for the stupid "not direct" reason on some sites..... anyhow other than that, my review on it

video, too birght, not enough saturation, not enough contrast, and quite grainy, but by no means unwatchable... for vcd ts i give it a 6

audio, other than missing part(s), it has a constant hum, and the background noises/soundtrack are, for some reason, much louder than the dialog, which doesn't seem right to me, but okay i guess.... 5

movie, umm... i think i'm gunna skip this one, didn't much care for the first, so i don't think the second will do me any better....

on the movie note, wasn't the ring (1) promoted as "the last movie you'll ever watch"??? so, what's this, the first movie you'll ever watch.... dead.....

__________________
nothing dulls glitter like vomit


Posted by sw33t on 03-20-2005 01:52 AM:

its not the greatest release,but for free i will take it until a newer release.
audio - 5
video - 6
movie - 8


Posted by HoldDaSalad on 03-20-2005 02:20 AM:

I hate to say but this rls is shit. I won't watch it, and I don't want to see the movie either.

Wow this is the first time I posted on this part of the forum. Loooong time.

__________________

Hold Da Motha Fuckin Salad.


Posted by Darkness on 03-20-2005 03:17 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by parasiticgannon
and I don't want to see the movie either.



Then dont post your bitching abou it..

quote:
Originally posted by parasiticgannon
Wow this is the first time I posted on this part of the forum. Loooong time.


And we care cause.. ?


Anyway, back to the point of these forums..

5.5/5/?


Posted by sindre on 03-20-2005 03:29 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by parasiticgannon
I hate to say but this rls is shit. I won't watch it, and I don't want to see the movie either.

Wow this is the first time I posted on this part of the forum. Loooong time.



then don't fucki** post

video: 6
audio: 5,5
movie : 6

alright movie, quick release


Posted by savman on 03-20-2005 03:38 AM:

pic aint that bad...audio goes of for 2mins on first disk

but other than that...cam quality...with direct audio(poor at that)


6/4/8


Posted by hackteck on 03-20-2005 03:51 AM:

3/3/? audio is missing like previous members stated video is very subpar and audio isnt much better quick release but i'll holdout for a better one


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 03-20-2005 04:12 AM:

hate to say it...this is crap, pure crap, the video is horrible on night scenes or dark areas. you can't see anything you have to guess whats there. Audio is clear, during day scenes its actually fine.
wait for a better release considering majority of the film will be at night. not day.

5/7/?

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by jugsta on 03-20-2005 04:44 AM:

honestly...video is not as bad as people wanna make it out to be..they complain when its too dark and complain when its too light...hell some of yall give dvd quality a 7 for video...
audio has some "interuptions" and some feedback or crackling...but its better than hearing people laughing or screaming...its a cam people! you cant make chicken salad out of chicken shit.
but the major problem is the nearly 3 minutes skipped in movie as well as the 1+ minutes of missing audio.
all together:

video -6
audio -7 ( not counting missing segment)
movie-4
typical sequal never living up to the original.


Posted by HellStorm on 03-20-2005 04:56 AM:

3/5/?

Video is bearable and audio is good for whats to be expected from the speed of relaese. The video on the otherhand is dark (prob dark movie on top of it as mentioned before) but I do expect a little more quality on the video even for the speed. But hey I give props on the speed!


Posted by Pickles on 03-20-2005 05:26 AM:

I can tolerate almost anything but this isn't one of them. Audio is completely missing in parts and video is bad as well. I tried to sit through it but I couldn't. That isn't a reason to give this release 2's and 3's though. Better luck next time STN

A 6
V 5
M ? didn't watch it all


Posted by Bubbalynch on 03-20-2005 06:50 AM:

Lets call it what it is shall we....CRAP. all the way around. Its been explained as to why several times already. Don't waste time or b/w on this and may god have mercy on its poor soul.....


Posted by jugsta on 03-20-2005 08:12 AM:

update:
Runtime according to IMDB: USA:111 min

rip runtime 100 min 9 seconds.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:17 AM. Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »
Show all 62 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.