VCDQuality Forums Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 58 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DIVX (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- Mr and Mrs Smith *XviD* - TELECINE - MoF (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=63674)


Posted by didiersarchi on 06-18-2005 04:31 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Hanin
looks good... video is a little washed... typical of these.... sound is hollow but reasonable..... 8/7/?



The sound is not hollow...you are talking about a cam not this TC.....


Posted by mattmatt02 on 06-18-2005 06:33 PM:

Sources?

ive always wondered this but when TUN releases a tc svcd, and then MoF releases an xvid tc, are they from the same source or is it a different tc source for each. i only guessed this because MoF's tc releases seem to always get higher ratings than TUN's. i always choose mof anyway because of smaller file size (usually).

if anyone can confirm this (eg by having seen a tun and mof copy of a film then plz let me know as then in future i will know which one to choose)


Posted by dcm386 on 06-18-2005 07:43 PM:

This copy looks real nice. There is a slight AR problem IMO the heads are stretched a little vertically. But this is no problem since I play back on my PC anyways and fixing the AR on media player classic means hitting the "2" button on the keypad a couple times

8/8/?

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by neo_tokyo
i wonder who's teh retard here..


Posted by doug77 on 06-18-2005 07:52 PM:

from quick scan quality looks excelent a quality release ar looks fine to me


Posted by XtremeX on 06-18-2005 08:55 PM:

Re: Sources?

quote:
Originally posted by mattmatt02
ive always wondered this but when TUN releases a tc svcd, and then MoF releases an xvid tc, are they from the same source or is it a different tc source for each. i only guessed this because MoF's tc releases seem to always get higher ratings than TUN's. i always choose mof anyway because of smaller file size (usually).

if anyone can confirm this (eg by having seen a tun and mof copy of a film then plz let me know as then in future i will know which one to choose)



Because MoFs are XviD & XviD is better quality (Mpeg 4)...


Posted by bluester on 06-18-2005 09:24 PM:

Nice TC

8/9/x


Posted by tibby on 06-18-2005 09:47 PM:

Also, if you own a lite-on LVD2002 stand alone you can correct any AR problems.


Posted by rascallion on 06-18-2005 10:00 PM:

Quality is fine on this release, converted to DVD and watched on the big screen.

Picture and sound are fine, colours are clear and bright.

V:9
A:8
M:5 and thats with the A.J push


Posted by vipper1oo7 on 06-18-2005 10:05 PM:

ya dude i noticed the same thing with tun and mof. seems like ether their working together or they just get the same source but this isnt the only groups ive seen this happen with i see this happen a lot. Sometimes youl even have a xvid,svcd, and dvdr with all different groups and all same quality at the same time


Posted by Vorph on 06-18-2005 10:15 PM:

Re: Sources?

quote:
Originally posted by mattmatt02
ive always wondered this but when TUN releases a tc svcd, and then MoF releases an xvid tc, are they from the same source or is it a different tc source for each. i only guessed this because MoF's tc releases seem to always get higher ratings than TUN's. i always choose mof anyway because of smaller file size (usually).

if anyone can confirm this (eg by having seen a tun and mof copy of a film then plz let me know as then in future i will know which one to choose)



Yes--TUN, MoF, and Meteor always use the same source.


Posted by pedantics on 06-19-2005 08:35 AM:

AR is a bit off, but who cares.

pic's a bit bright and grainy - but can be fixed with brightness/contrast/sharpness on the tv. looks much better on a standalone than on a monitor.

sound's a bit muffled or something - but stereo is nice.

movie a bit dissapointing, but some cool action scenes.

7.5/7/7


Posted by OneCrazyDJ on 06-19-2005 08:56 AM:

Well first off, all you guys putting these bad comments about this rip that MOF either need to get glasses, or get something bigger then your parents 20 inch tv in the living room. I own a 52 inch hitachi plasma and i just got done watching the movie. No converting whatsoever. I burned the 2 part xvid directly onto a DVD-R and watched it on my philips dvp642. Let me tell you something people, the picture looked so amazing i thought i was watching in the movies. Second of all, the audio was outstanding. I own a bose surround sound. It sounded mint. Yeah it wasn't 7.1 audio, but it was crazy nasty clear and crisp (people should sometime go in with the q-tip instead of just wiping around the ear). VIDEO 9.5/AUDIO 9.0/MOVIE BAD AZZ 10.0


Posted by RiWaLE on 06-19-2005 10:52 AM:

great TC, picture is crispy, AR can be fixed, colours look great on TV and better by lowering blue channel a bit.

Movie is good, nice plot but between action a little bit boring

8/7/6


Posted by in5ane on 06-19-2005 12:14 PM:

Woah, I've never known VCDQ to be so full of crap:

1) The AR is wrong. 100% - I watched it on my widecreen TV in the correct aspect mode, and everyone was obviously taller and thinner. I assume they made this release anamorphic.

2) The sound isn't good. It really doesn't sound direct at all. To the 7.1 Bose guy- wtf you must have a shit set up the rest of the time to think this is good. I tried this on my surround set-up in a ton of modes, Pro Logic this and that- the best was plain old 2ch- and i didn't really notice any stereo effects. Also it was hard to hear to some bits of conversation if they were talking quietly. And yes, i had it turned up loud, but that didn't help because the problem was really the bassy-echoey effect.

3) Picture is good, but blacks seem very washed.

For a TC which should have awesome video and sound, this was a disappointment. Still, it's the best version available, but all the comments here would have you believe it was perfect!

Oh, and the movie SUCKED. My friend hit the nail on the head when we finished watching it: WE HAVE BEEN DUPED INTO WATCHING A CHICK FLICK! Think about it, pretty long but very little action, about marriage and stuff, featuring a goverment team of kickass woman, and wtf Brad Pitt as the guy hero? No way, he's just there for the ladies, a real action hero would have been Willis or someone.

So ratings for TC: 8 for video, 6 for audio, and 4 for movie. I was pretty bored watching it tbh.


Posted by pedantics on 06-19-2005 12:38 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by OneCrazyDJ
Well first off, all you guys putting these bad comments about this rip that MOF either need to get glasses, or get something bigger then your parents 20 inch tv in the living room. I own a 52 inch hitachi plasma and i just got done watching the movie. No converting whatsoever. I burned the 2 part xvid directly onto a DVD-R and watched it on my philips dvp642. Let me tell you something people, the picture looked so amazing i thought i was watching in the movies. Second of all, the audio was outstanding. I own a bose surround sound. It sounded mint. Yeah it wasn't 7.1 audio, but it was crazy nasty clear and crisp (people should sometime go in with the q-tip instead of just wiping around the ear). VIDEO 9.5/AUDIO 9.0/MOVIE BAD AZZ 10.0


what's your home address? I've been looking for a hitachi plasma and bose sound system. that's some BAD AZZ GEAR, y0!


Posted by someboy on 06-19-2005 01:41 PM:

yeh grabbed this yesterday and finally got round to watching it - thank you MoF great release!

v-9
a-8
m-6


Posted by mattmatt02 on 06-19-2005 02:23 PM:

to add to my previous post(s), watching it on a standalone is the better option by far. i converted to dvd using vso and its almost perfect quality, excellent colors, very sharp pic and sound seems perfect on an ordinary nicam tv. my pc monitor seems to make black scenes in movies look dark grey so im not sure if the lower ratings that people have been making are based on pc viewing. overall,on a tv is almost perfect and about as good as a tc gets!


Posted by rhyz on 06-19-2005 04:51 PM:

AR isnt bad at all, great release.... After joining and vso-ing it looked and sound good on the stand alone.

8.5/8.5/7


Posted by dev_himu on 06-19-2005 06:14 PM:

Where do i download Mr and Mrs Smith *XviD* *NEW*

hey
i searched for "Mr and Mrs Smith *XviD* - TELECINE - MoF" both in mirc n bitorrent .. but couldnt find it any whrere .. other than those 2 i dont know any other downloading software .. so can any one of u guys plz help me find the movie..
thankx
Dev_himu


Posted by Sniper1935 on 06-19-2005 08:09 PM:

V8/A7/M8

Video - Nice, pretty clear, no blurring which I usually notice on Telecines but it does seem slightly stretched on television (look's fine on my monitor though lol)

Audio - Sounded like there's too much bass in it but otherwise it's clear (sorted with GoldWave reducing bass and it make's the vocal's clearer)

Movie - Not bad, not what I expected though.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:33 PM. Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 58 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.