VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Red Eye *SVCD* - TELECINE - NBP (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=65913)

quote:

---

Originally posted by vipper1oo7
saw this in the theater and that little zoom at the beging during the dreamworks logo is part of the movie it did the same thing at the cinema
as a tc
9/8/10 alwsome movie

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by zerobyte
What are you talking about.TC Machine not in focus?Do you have any idea how that technology works!!!!This is a ts.no wat around it.If you actually take the time to understand how a tc machine transfers film frames to digital frames you would know theres no chance of the freakin thing going out of focus.

---

guys how can u give audio 8s and 9s...try to raise the volume and then write again...there is an anoying ''zzzz''....

8/5/?

quote:

---

Originally posted by Horton
Bullshit. I saw this in cinema also - and it does not 'zoom in' and focus itself during the dreamworks logo.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by hainrs
'Fraid it does.

---

I dont understand why everyone on every NBP thread argues "This is a TC , this isnt a TC" ... etc bleh. Especially for NBP/TUN members to come on and say "Yes this is a TC" , when all they do is download an XViD and encode it.

99% of the users on this forum including myself have never seen a TC machine much less touched one , including every NBP member.

Untill NBP touched a TC machine i will continue to believe their mislabled TS's as thats how their labled on Torrent (source).

All politics and this thread can go on for months lol .... lets stick to how crappy quality this is for a TELECiNE !.

__________________

quote:

---

Originally posted by betelgeus on Fantastic.Four.2005.SCREENER-TUBE
i know exactly what a screener is and have done for 20 years.

screener should be dvd quality with hallmarks and trust me on this

so ask next question!

---

video - 7
audio - 6
movie - ? heard its damn good from a friend



the video is blurry, a cheap TC or more likely a TS

the sound has a nasty hiss to it.

oo i not posted in a while not been much to post on with the scene the way it is at the minute

anyway id say this is a tc but each to there own i suppose we will find out if royal release the dvdr tc

neway

rated as watever

8/7/not watched yet looks good

Definite TS, nice pic a tad blurry, there's a shadow of someone walking across the screen and sitting down to the left of the screen when the "Red Eye" logo comes up until they cut from the guys wallet (bout 20 seconds, don't usually get people's shadows in TC's )the sound is ok but has a hiss to it, shame it's nuked maybe a "proper" by NBP to tag it as a TS will come along

based on the full release as a TS

8/7/8

__________________

Airhead2, whats your problem with NBP/Asteroids/Royal, u seem to be getting quite upset there, and most of your comments makes no sense at all, and are extremely uneducated to say the least.

The Royal DVDR's are in no way from some Russian TS XviD Torrent, have u actually downloaded them, even on a TC, its obvious if the soure has been an avi at some point, even 2 and 3 Disc versions still leave some clues behind, and if they are using an XviD, then they must be the best encoders around at the moment.

Its true the recent TC's have been quite poor compared to last years by TUN and Meteor, but still damn good in my opinion, and theres no way The Island was a TS
http://www.vcdquality.com/index.php...sample&id=54246

Since i dont have any pics of the DVDR and that looked better than the XviD.

The worst thing on these releases is the sound not the video, every one has had horrible Mono, hissy sound, the video on the whole has been Decent to Good.

Im not overly familiar with loads of Torrent sites, but i have not seen a Russian TS of any of the TC's released, so im pretty sure your full of shit, but someone please feel free to correct me.

ok what is the point of all this bitching? maybe nbp shouldn't have labeled a ts as a tc but really, who cares? just so long as its decent quality and we get it for free right? i'm suprised no ones mentioned the obvious yet...does it have full end credits? can't comment coz i've only seen the first 10 mins or so but that would probably be a good starting point.....

from what i saw....
v - 8
a - 7
m - ?

EDIT:: watched the whole thing now....i'd say its a tc to be honest.... how many ts's have full end credits? none that i've ever seen... although feel free to correct me if im wrong...

__________________
Yo, She-Bitch..... Let's Go!

Yes, full end credits, right up to the final Dreamworks Logo, all perfectly framed and readable.

Now how many TS have that, and why would they bother.

not surprised it is mislabled

won't even bother rating

__________________
Rick

Its obviously a ts. Video is pretty good and audio is okay if you don't turn it up too loud. Movie wasn't bad but I thought there would be more to it. Cillain Murphy looks like he's going to be the next big Irish Star to hit Hollywood which is great cause I'm sick of seeing Collin Farrell's mug in the paper.

8/6/6

I think its a TS

Rated as TS 9/6/8

Pic - Superb
Sound - OK
Flik - Very suprised by this one - Great!

in your response to saying "I dont understand how the f'ing technology works.Ive been a colorist for going on 6 years now.Your two bits of research at the cintel website mean jack to me.If you understood or have witnessed transfer on a regular basis you would know that the optical scanning effects are secondary and you have to intentionally set the machine to use them.I cant think of any reason unless the person was drunk that any of these optical effects would be used during the transfer.Not to mention the machines being used by these russians are no where close to the caliber of machine your trying to debunk my comments based on.Why do you think 90% of the telecine we see end up having kind of a 70's look to the video.Because thats about how old the machines there probably using are not a 600k rank cintel.Stick with what you know dumbass.This is not a ts.nor are most of the releases labled as such lately.

Pretty good film but not good enough to watch twice. good pic, audio a little dodgy in places but nothing too bad.

...

This is a really good TS. Def. worth a download if you can't wait. The movie is pretty good as well.

8/7/8

Shouldn't it be nuked on the gounds of playing time?
It lasted all of 73 minutes when I watched it, according to IMDB it's an 85 minute movie!?

quote:

---

Originally posted by razorbladex90
ok what is the point of all this bitching? maybe nbp shouldn't have labeled a ts as a tc but really, who cares? just so long as its decent quality and we get it for free right? i'm suprised no ones mentioned the obvious yet...does it have full end credits? can't comment coz i've only seen the first 10 mins or so but that would probably be a good starting point.....

from what i saw....
v - 8
a - 7
m - ?

EDIT:: watched the whole thing now....i'd say its a tc to be honest.... how many ts's have full end credits? none that i've ever seen... although feel free to correct me if im wrong...

---