VCDQuality Forums Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 34 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- King Kong *SVCD* - CAM - SWiNE (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=67776)


Posted by JangoFeet on 12-17-2005 04:14 PM:

2.5/5/9

This is horrible quality no matter how you look at it. Saw the film in the theater yesterday, oh OMG, amazing! You really have to see it in the theater once to really gauge the amount of shit going on, I think even when the DVD is out, it's going to be too hectic and fast moving to uderstand on a small screen. It'll be the new demo disc for HT enthusiasts audio systems tho .


Posted by Dirty on 12-17-2005 04:34 PM:

3/3/X

man.. video looks like trash. why bother releasing this lol


Posted by White Rabbit on 12-17-2005 04:43 PM:

yes i agree, not the best quality at all

from sample:

v 5 (looks like they smeared vaseline over the cam lens, blurred to fuck)

a 6 (average for a cam, nothing special but better than the hydro version)

m ? (it looks amazing but im gonna have to wait)


get your hopes up ppl, it was released in russia on the 14th so i reckon we're likely to get a telecine in similar quality to aeon flux, which would rule.

__________________

quote:
Originally posted by pHo
the difference between compression and encoding is:

compression software works the same way as trying to get The 404, who is 350lbs, through a normal door. its method is to basically keep kicking The 404 until he gets thru the door. This works quickly, but leaves a nasty mess.

encoding software is the equivalent of The 404 going on a diet and walking thru the door. takes longer and sometimes more skill, but ultimately worth it.


Posted by immun3 on 12-17-2005 05:59 PM:

Deserves more than what its being rated at, decent enough CAM, but at 4 CD's its jst not worth it for what it is.

Video - First off, has a bad pixellation issues, coupling this with a heafty crop of the top and bottom pushes this beyond watchable for a film of this 'supposed' calibre. On the upper hand, no significant tilt, and generally the colours are nice, only a minor dullness to the edges to be honest.

Audio - for a CAM it doesnt have any hissy background disturbance from about five random rar's i checked. Jst a bit of movement from the cameraman. Is a bit on the hollow side....

5/6/*

With all likelihood of an early christmas present in the form of a decent TS, or hopefully a TC, i think i'll be sitting this release out.


Posted by chrispeters on 12-17-2005 06:14 PM:

4 cd`s lol
this is bad
v-3
a-3
m-9 shit hot film

__________________
Same shit....Different Day........


Posted by Striped on 12-17-2005 06:19 PM:

NOT worthy of SVCD no no no


V:3
A:7
M:8


Posted by NoNe23 on 12-17-2005 06:51 PM:

Well I Wouldnt Get This Copy 4cds and for shit quality well i guess we can thank em for there effort so thanx:S but will wait for a TC Or A nice TS like from maVen or Even ORC

Video-5 (blurry but ok colours)

Audio-5 (ok and clear)

Movie-? (still waiting for a Nice Copy)

__________________
GGG-UnOt

THUGLIFE

MaKaVeLi All DaY


Posted by guido23 on 12-17-2005 07:05 PM:

Still not worth getting can't comment on whole fim but checked a couple of rar's and i'm going to wait for another release as this release does not dot he film justice and will spoil the movie for you.

4/4/?


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 12-17-2005 07:05 PM:

its not that bad....some of you are just being rude...I guess since Swine made it...its getting bashed..

Good release...but 4 disc is crazy...

6/6/10 movie was great...worth seeing in theaters.

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by 0nslaught on 12-17-2005 07:08 PM:

Video - 3
Audio - 4
Movie - 8

Blurry video and below average audio. Not worth it especially since it's 4 CDs. Wait for a better release or go to the theaters because it's a really good movie.

__________________
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.


Posted by Mandrake on 12-17-2005 07:10 PM:

I agree with BLUE-NEO. Not bad for a cam. On tv it's better then watching it on the pc. The movie sucks.

6/6/4


Posted by qwertyu2 on 12-17-2005 07:37 PM:

Hmm, what to rate..

Okay; it gets:

3/4/9

Something's in the works all..


Posted by StanTek on 12-17-2005 08:09 PM:

First. Video = 5
Audio = 7
Movie = 8

__________________


Posted by barney on 12-17-2005 08:39 PM:

3/3/?

__________________
jeez have i been a member here that long?


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:51 PM. Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 34 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.