Pages (2): « 1 [2] Show all 32 posts from this thread on one page |
VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Bloodrayne - CAM - HYdRO (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=68148)
Video: 7 - Not horrible for a cam release
Audio: 5 - Worst thing about this release
Movie: 7 - Not exactly a cinematic masterpeice, but then again, what is? All you people rating it anything under 5 clearly haven't seen the movie and are just doing the everyday douchebag BS and jumping on the "Uwe Boll Sucks!" bandwagon. STFU and watch the movie, and then rate it accordingly.
stupid movie
and they didn't make loken look hot. she looks chunky.
she looked better in T3
A nice new helping of cheese curtisy of the good Doctor Boll!
Anyone expecting anything else shouldn't waste their time, this dude gets financed to LOSE money.
I'm hoping this is as bad as House Of The Dead, although reviews I've read say otherwise.
quote:
Originally posted by trenchant
Video: 7 - Not horrible for a cam release
Audio: 5 - Worst thing about this release
Movie: 7 - Not exactly a cinematic masterpeice, but then again, what is? All you people rating it anything under 5 clearly haven't seen the movie and are just doing the everyday douchebag BS and jumping on the "Uwe Boll Sucks!" bandwagon. STFU and watch the movie, and then rate it accordingly.
__________________
<Si> bout to jailbreak iphone
<kippa> great, then you can find an app to call someone who cares
:: Worthless gimmick
__________________
I am the making films of Germany Best.
Suck my Oscar.
Video: 7 Not too bad for a cam, a little pixelated at times... but definitely watchable.
Audio: 5 A bit less than your typical CAM. There's obvious feedback from the camera, but the sound is still somewhat clear.
Movie: ? Haven't seen the whole thing yet, so I'll let you know after.
6/6/- i havent watched it... from all the reviews i really dont feel like wasting my time, when i heard about bloodrayne i was so excited til i saw who the director was, such a great potential no doubt destroyed by such a poor director, why do ppl constantly give this man money, then in an interview he stated "the internet community give me a hard time because i am german and pay for my movies with nazi money" DUDE NO ITS CAUSE YOU SUCK
not a bad release, watchable I suppose
7, 5, ? but supposed to be crap
as a CAM or more broadly?
Well, do we evaluate the quality of the release as a CAM, or more generally the quality regardless of format? As a CAM this is amusing, a good way to illustrate what a CAM is, with all the flaws vividly apparent. But generally speaking it is watchable, but let's not kid ourselves about the quality.
Video 5
Audio 4
how good the movie is is up to how you like it, neutral observation=5
Well I was going to watch the Movie but from all the review and what people in this forum are saying I really don't want to.
Video = 5
Audio = 4
Movie = 5 I thought it was going to be better.
I aint seen this version yet but the prevail release gave me a headache 20mins in. Pretty poor really
5/4/1
movie sucks
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:11 PM. | Pages (2): « 1 [2] Show all 32 posts from this thread on one page |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.