VCDQuality Forums Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 44 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Underworld Evolution - CAM - PreVail (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=68357)


Posted by NoNe23 on 01-22-2006 03:08 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by crudman
How will that happen? Prevail got their first, so no one else can release an "official" cam. An internal perhaps, but those aren't all that common and dont get spread well.

Unless prevail gets nuked for missing parts (someone said it was missing).

If U read scene rules they can still put em out under SVCD or get a TC Out

Video-5(Dark and Blurry)

Audio-5(hollow)

Movie-5 More Crappier Than The First

__________________
GGG-UnOt

THUGLIFE

MaKaVeLi All DaY


Posted by LOLobo on 01-22-2006 03:22 AM:

I liked the original. Not for any good reasons.

This is cropped pretty thin, has a slight angle, and a slight blur & darkness (looks to be the movie though).

The blurriness should be resolved by watching it on the TV instead of the PC.

I skimmed through the first 25 minutes. Sound is very good for a CAM (on PC speakers). Hollow, but not to the point that you don't understand every word.

I won't have any issues with this release and will likely be able to sit through it until a Retail DVD (if it's any good).

7/8/x


Posted by jacktheripper on 01-22-2006 04:11 AM:



I love this movie not a bad release for the first one.

6 - Video

4.5 - Audio

9.8 - Movie


Posted by CATBOX on 01-22-2006 04:12 AM:

An actual review of the release

Aspect ratio is thin. Colors are washed out, and blacks appear gray. Has a slight flicker to it, but not too bad. Audio is very nice for a CAM. Its strong, and bass heavy with a slight echo. The movie itself was excellent. I didn't need to see Scott Speedman naked, but other than that, it was very good. Great effects, great storyline. Bring on the third of the trilogy!

6/8/9

CATBOX


Posted by pedrohead on 01-22-2006 04:46 AM:

Smile

I'll wait for a better copy ,but glad to see it out 7/7/6 .


Posted by dank! on 01-22-2006 05:38 AM:

Video is crisp but dark and has a slight flicker to it. Its cropped pretty heavily, but has a decent aspect ratio and most of the screen is there.

Audio isn't as hollow as you might be led to believe, good range of sound not lacking in bass or treble--a slight hiss and a few coughing audience members.

Movie is good, or at least I thought so, I think the first one had a better storyline, but this one was a solid sequel.

5/6/7


Posted by crudman on 01-22-2006 06:24 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by NoNe23
If U read scene rules they can still put em out under SVCD or get a TC Out


We were talking cam, not TC
TC is fairly unusual, at least a real one. Most of the time its a TS instead. TC requires some pretty expensive equipment, like $50,000 kinda stuff. A number of so called TC's are actually just really good TS.

I'm guessing most groups would probably choose to do a TS if they wanted to release something after someone already did a cam, all you need is to plug into the handicapped plug, not that hard. In fact thats why some of the films in last year or so have had french video. They cap the film in canada or maybe france, and then record the audio from a US theatre.


Posted by Jigsaw1 on 01-22-2006 06:52 AM:

6/6/9

Just watched it in theaters, loved it. Was better than the first. And Kate Beckinsale nude makes it all the more better .

__________________
Solve the puzzle.


Posted by BLUE-NEO on 01-22-2006 07:52 AM:

yeah this film was great I saw it tonight..and this cam does not do justice for the quality of the film...its too dark for one, and the sound isn't too hollow because you expect that from a cam...but the video all together is just piss poor...

4/5/9 Loved the movie...

__________________
Reality Is Only A State Of Mind...


Posted by webjammer on 01-22-2006 10:28 AM:

quote:
The blurriness should be resolved by watching it on the TV instead of the PC


Kind of amazing in a nice sort of way how it makes this flick look better.

6/5/8


Posted by justinlaw on 01-22-2006 11:55 AM:

not the best but watchable i heard that maven have a good copy but they need audio for it dont count me on this its just what i've heard


Posted by zerobyte on 01-22-2006 01:08 PM:

crudman not one of the grp's are responsible for the film to video transfer of a tc they release there manufactered by for profit bootlegers not rls grp's.. also the machines are much more costly than 50 g's. Its extremely annoying when people f'ing try to start schoolin folks in hopes someone might think there so bloody ereet. Gay az shit. I thought it was a decent cam. about average. Too dark, too grainy.wrong shuTTer speed used. The sound is better than the average cam. All in all though, the quality of this release does far to much in way of imparing my ability to fully appreciate the film. Im hoping for atleast a FUCK quality silver in the next few days. That would be more than enough.


Posted by crudman on 01-22-2006 01:22 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by webjammer
Kind of amazing in a nice sort of way how it makes this flick look better.

6/5/8


That happens with pretty much any movie. Why? Because the average TV screen is so usually low quality ( and often low resolution) it can help make things look better. Plus its often interlaced. If you tried it on a big screen HD TV, it would look just as bad as on a high resolution monitor.

Which incidentally is one reason why a lot of people dont care about quality much, they just want something fast, they burn it to a dvd and watch it on thier tvs and think its fine. Whereas other people watch it on good equipment or a computer and want to have something with a bit of quality.

quote:
Originally posted by zerobyte
Its extremely annoying when people f'ing try to start schoolin folks in hopes someone might think there so bloody ereet. Gay az shit.

I could care less what people think. I'm just trying to help people learn something. I dont know it all, so if anyone knows things I dont, feel free to correct my info.


Posted by homo_sapian on 01-22-2006 04:26 PM:

expected cam rls, props for speed 5/5/8


Posted by aXs-SVCD on 01-22-2006 04:52 PM:

its dark movie it self, and this is cam and mean time i saw subtitles mostly on cam you don't see subtitles that clear, and its not cut that much on top and bottom so its watchable, for dark dark movie, Quality is good, its fadding in and out like other earlier ones i seen ** over all ** great movie worth watching in Theater and if you can't afford it in Theater then download this and watch

__________________
Lets See What's New Today
( VCDQUALITY ROCKS )

OK, Please Stop asking for Movies, and Go and find it.


Posted by EagleClaw on 01-22-2006 06:49 PM:

Video-6 Dark

Audio-6 so-so

Movie- Just watched a little...

__________________
---------------------------------------


Posted by nullvoiid on 01-22-2006 06:58 PM:

5/5/x

very dark with a blueish tinge, almost black an white in parts audio a little bit hollow but overall a good cam, this type of movie never cams well its gonna have to be a telecine or better to do this move justice

props to prevail for a quick release!!


Posted by Dremy on 01-22-2006 09:24 PM:

wasn't too bad for a cam. audio was a bit hollow but alright. picture was kind of dark and hard to make out in a lot of scenes. This release is watchable except for one serious problem.
it is missing the end. I haven't seen this movie before so I don't know how much is missing, though I don't think it was very much as the movie seemed to be over. but this release will probably end up getting nuked.

7/5/5


Posted by ol_perfesser on 01-22-2006 10:36 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by nullvoiid


very dark with a blueish tinge, almost black an white in parts audio a little bit hollow but overall a good cam, this type of movie never cams well its gonna have to be a telecine or better to do this move justice

props to prevail for a quick release!!



That says everything I was going to say.
Except that the first movie was better.

5/6/6

__________________
Op


Posted by savman on 01-23-2006 12:55 AM:

not bad for a cam guys thanks for the effort

i have just had a look at mavens(no audio)

looks better..lets just hope the right audio supplyer turns up

and then we will have a good ts


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:19 AM. Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 44 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.