VCDQuality Forums - Mission Impossible III - CAM

Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »
Show all 79 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Mission Impossible III - CAM - Saga (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=70012)

Posted by Man_Of_Mystery on 05-06-2006 12:04 AM:

its nuked:

REASON-glitching.audio_audio.stops.playing.1:07:26.back.at.1:07:54_sample.reencoded

Posted by Arthur Daily on 05-06-2006 12:27 AM:

Sounded like the Cammer has a Manchester Accent ?

Oh the rating...
Well its a Cam, Say no more

NEXT!

__________________
*Meet the rest of the VCDQ Crew, HERE *

Posted by socks on 05-06-2006 12:44 AM:

For a CAM the sound is (very) good. There are portions where the audio goes silent for a few seconds but it isnt a big deal. Video is a bit pixelated, usual fair but cammer is steady and overall this is a good release.

Movie isnt that great tho

v7/a7/m4

Posted by davd banner on 05-06-2006 01:20 AM:

some cams are good. but this is awful. wait a few days.

Posted by nakid on 05-06-2006 01:46 AM:

based on the cam standards its kinda bluzzy .. and pixilated too. and look okay when no one is moving, when they do it breaks up really bad.

anyways.. audio is average cam, nothing to write home about.. the movie.. well i'll just hold out till a better one comes along or see it in the theatre.

video 5
audio 5
movie ?

Posted by mkirons on 05-06-2006 01:51 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Jules_Tavernier
usual saga rubbish.

Pic is crap, and although the audio is better then there other releases, its still crap.

4.4.?

your a knob, or half blind, seems people on here dont like saga too much

this is very watchable, and by the standard of the cams coming out recently this is far above them

video 7.5
sound 7.0
movie 8.0

Posted by evildwarf on 05-06-2006 01:54 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by lickmebitches
On a side note, at the end there is about 3 minutes of footage that is nothing but the cammer walking into the bathroom and taking a piss. It is fucking hilarious. You hear someone whistling the MI theme, then some old man bitching to his wife, then, you hear the cammer "draining his lizard". All the way down to the "AHHH". Fucking beautiful. [/B]

Yeah, it is awesome! I ripped the audio:

http://media.putfile.com/MI3-SaGa-CAM-audio

Posted by Striped on 05-06-2006 01:59 AM:

not bad but not worthy of a watch either imo.

5.5
6.5
? but it looks good from the opening scene

Posted by PtPiRaTa on 05-06-2006 02:28 AM:

Screenshots

Some screenshots from MI-III

http://ptpirata.planetaclix.pt/missionimp3.JPG

No more avaiable

Posted by phantom1 on 05-06-2006 03:02 AM:

mission impossible 3

good rls, wheres HORTONS reply in this? feckin asshole owt to die, do the whole scene a favour! knob only moans about rls he aint related 2, (init) byee asshole 4 good (the bigboys are back and we dont want little shits like U"

regards
Phantom!

prv signature!!!!!!!!!!!!

__________________
1 inch is the difference between giving and receiving.

Posted by jumpyjim on 05-06-2006 03:11 AM:

video 6
audio 5
movie 7

Image isn't too bad and the sound is good enough.

For a cam it's not bad at all.

Posted by Sccmj23 on 05-06-2006 04:30 AM:

This is really good quality for a CAM. Sample looked great. I dont see why so many of you people complain about a movie this good that is FREEEEEEE.

video/8
audio/8
movie/10

great action movie, i really enjoyed it in the theatre and i cant wait to watch it again when im done downloading

Posted by giannisKM on 05-06-2006 04:59 AM:

NICE AND FAST RLS FROM SAGA
thanks guys,
many ppl was waiting for that.
there are 10 mins missing from the scene in the plane but not much to loose.
also the sound is missing from times to times. i didnt understand why this happened.nice work again and thank you.
hope Da vinci will come out faster

6/6/8

Posted by CiEZ420 on 05-06-2006 05:29 AM:

Just plain YUK! Avoid this unless you got ants in your pants and cant wait.

6 [would have been a 5 but the taking a leak part brought it up to a 6 !!! LOL ] / 6 / ?

Posted by Kraq Le Pop on 05-06-2006 08:09 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Arthur Daily
Sounded like the Cammer has a Manchester Accent ?

Dumb comment.
Sorry, had to say it.

Posted by ameen on 05-06-2006 08:47 AM:

Not bad at all very watchable first release
the sound is very good so i will say this is
a decent watchable release thanks to the
(saga group)

V 6.8
A 6
M 7

Posted by turk182 on 05-06-2006 08:52 AM:

yeh it wasnt too bad, some scenes are a bit dark and the audio does come in and out for like 10 seconds at a time, about 6 times during the movie but i watched it all

v: 6
a: 6
m: 8

at the end of the release(when the movie finishes) there appears to be about 2 minutes of chatting at the cinema, but i couldnt understand what they were saying

__________________

Posted by Big-Black-Man on 05-06-2006 09:44 AM:

not to bad for a 1st

5/4/8

Posted by crudman on 05-06-2006 09:49 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by UrbanSmurf
agreed it is a very fast release and a fair cam at that but why rate it so high

if 10 is a retail dvd quality release then why are people rating this with 8`s and 9`s be realistic please

There are 2 ways to rate. One is with the best HD 1920x1080 res footage at 10. That would place dvd9 at like 8, dvd5 at 7, dvdrips at 6, TC's at 5, TS's at 4, and cams at like 2.
Not much room for variables like good TS vs bad TS, or good cam vs bad cam in this rating system.
So better start voting 2 on all cams if this is you.

The other way to rate is to have several sets of ratings depending on type. Like with a DVD, 10 would be straight from retail, no re-encoding and 3 would be transcoded crap. 7 would be an average decent multipass CCE.

For cams, the absolute best cams would be 9's or 10's, average cams around 5 and most crappy cams would be 3's or so.

For TS, you'd look at the best TS's seen, like the better CTP releases, better videocd ones, etc, and rate them 9's or 10's, and average TS's would be around 5, with crappy ones around 3.

So which system makes more sense for rating? To me the separate scales for each type do, since there's more room to rate good or crappy ones. It doesn't make sense to me to have uncut dvd9's at 9 and cams at like 2 all the time.

Another way to look at it, the people interested in d/ling cams probably aren't those who are super picky on watching the movie in DVD quality at first viewing. More of them probably want to know how it compares to other cams more than how it would compare to a 6 month in the future dvd.
When I look at cam ratings, I'm more interested in looking at is this cam any good compared to other cams. I know its going to be a far far cry from dvd, simply because its a cam.

Posted by Methadon on 05-06-2006 10:06 AM:

I base my ratings as 10 being a copy that looks flawless for a composite connection, and 1 being a copy that's totally unwatchable. With audio it's 5.1 DTS vs distorted crap/sync issues. I think the rating system here was implemented with the average person in mind, who wants to know the "overall" quality of a release, rather than how "good" it is "for this type".

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:39 PM.

Pages (4): « 1 [2] 3 4 »
Show all 79 posts from this thread on one page