VCDQuality Forums - Superman Returns - CAM

Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 35 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Superman Returns - CAM - SiLVER (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=70881)

Posted by $users on 07-01-2006 12:35 AM:

What the hell is with the music video at the end?

SOmeone nuke this POS !

Posted by Sccmj23 on 07-01-2006 01:50 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by LOLobo
They're on the main page.

worst sample ever...that doesnt show anything

Posted by dontbegay on 07-01-2006 02:02 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Sccmj23
worst sample ever...that doesnt show anything

the jpg's arent the fucking sample you twat

Posted by Sccmj23 on 07-01-2006 03:55 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by sourojuro
the jpg's arent the fucking sample you twat

i meant sample pic, not sample of the actual rls itself u idiot

Posted by Methadon on 07-01-2006 04:17 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by $users
What the hell is with the music video at the end?

SOmeone nuke this POS !

Wow. I guess I did download this rls. I had gotten it before any group had tagged it.

In all honesty, this isn't the worst release I've ever seen.....but it *is* close. I can't believe they kept the music video on it.

The file as it came to me was originally an avi at 275 MB, with 75MB being audio. At first, I thought it was just super compressed, but after watching, somebody used a real crappy camera. C'mon, cammers! Attack of the Show had a report on the best cameras to bootleg with a month or two ago. Watch more G4!

Video - p
Ugh. At least they released it under 'Silver'

Audio - 4.5+
If I shut my eyes, the movie is definately better.

Movie - X
I was gonna rate it a 4, but I think I need to see it in better quality to make sure I'm fair. As it stands, I really liked how well Spacey played Lex, but I felt Lois was a bad cast. Before too long into the movie, I felt Superman was unfair because if he caught you breaking the law, he just turns you in. Once I saw them make Luthor an extremist, I figured, "ok, as long as he's just doing the impossible". Still, I would've liked to see Luthor be an evil genious that wasn't bent on killing, but rather just doing things that some would like, and most would dislike. Maybe I watch too many movies with that....

Posted by on 07-01-2006 04:21 AM:

Re: Re: why are you wasting your time

quote:
Originally posted by socks
Rate the fucking release and move on you tit - noone gives a shit what you think. From sample:

v 2
a 2
m ?

f@ck 0ff i will give my opinion any damn day i feel like it, rate the release LOL you call this a release? I call this a waste of bandwidth. this is a sad joke, this is not even worthly of being on here.

Posted by Methadon on 07-01-2006 05:27 AM:

Re: why are you wasting your time

quote:
Originally posted by bigshoe
15 or so cammers have already been busted, there are like 5 fakes on the net already. This movie is well worth the 5.50 matine admission i paid to see it. GO SEE IT pay your 5.50 like i did. The MOVIE WAS AWESOME i can not vote on the quality of this film as i wont bother with any of these bs release, from the jpeg pic looks awfull.

V (from JPG) 1
A (from other useres comments) 1
M (I saw this in IMAX WOW) 9

I'd love to see this in IMAX, but I gotta drive to another state, cause from what I understand, none of the ones in my state will have it.

Aside from that, how can you rate a release based on a still image and other's opinions?

Posted by Mongoloid on 07-01-2006 05:36 AM:

Re: Re: Re: why are you wasting your time

quote:
Originally posted by bigshoe
f@ck 0ff i will give my opinion any damn day i feel like it, rate the release LOL you call this a release? I call this a waste of bandwidth. this is a sad joke, this is not even worthly of being on here.

Doesn't make really sense tho that you urge people to watch it in the theatres (like yourself according to you), and then rate a truly TRULY inferior piece of doodoo which shouldn't even have made it to vcdq. This isn't worthy to be called such.
No matter how crappy the movie you are about to watch - it's not a big suprise that watching any movie on a big screen in the cinema, would give a better viewing experience than a cammed copy.

That's like saying, an original document is usually of a higher quality than a xerox copy. Stating this won't make no living soul go like : "NO SHIT SHERLOCK!! YOU'RE RIGHT!!".

Don't get me wrong: I'm not saying I disagree if you state that for this piece of lobster, these clams really dont compare. I agree 100%.

Then again.. you don't NEED to make sense over here, so you indeed are allowed to rate it any damn way you want to

Posted by Mooby on 07-01-2006 10:14 AM:

Excrement!

Looks like someone's smeared a jobby on the lens.

__________________
Honesty is my greatest frailty

Posted by sdotty313 on 07-01-2006 01:11 PM:

1.5/1/?-video quality is so bad i cant even watch it and give a good opinion on the film

waits for a better release

Posted by porntogo on 07-01-2006 04:12 PM:

Video 2
Audio 2
Movie -didnt waste my time ruining the enjoyment of a good film with this rubbish release.

Im sure given the age of technology phone cam releases will be everywhere soon. Its so easy to just flip up your slim line camera and leave it on the edge of your seat, easier to do it in a packed house as long as your mate is in the seat beside you.

I wonder if we will see mobile phones being banned from the cinema soon just like cam-corders

Anyway, everyone should ignore these releases so we dont get more of them, but im aware a lot of people will download just to moan about the quality afterwards.

Posted by z00mba on 07-01-2006 04:30 PM:

So it's not even a CAM, it should be tagged CEL... lol

V: 1
A: 1
M: ?

For a CEL I'd raise my note to V:8 A: 8 but there's no such category...

Posted by CANES1 on 07-02-2006 11:19 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by porntogo
Video 2
Audio 2
Movie -didnt waste my time ruining the enjoyment of a good film with this rubbish release.

Im sure given the age of technology phone cam releases will be everywhere soon. Its so easy to just flip up your slim line camera and leave it on the edge of your seat, easier to do it in a packed house as long as your mate is in the seat beside you.

I wonder if we will see mobile phones being banned from the cinema soon just like cam-corders

Anyway, everyone should ignore these releases so we dont get more of them, but im aware a lot of people will download just to moan about the quality afterwards.

How would theatres enforce a cell phone ban? They have a hard enough time with cam-corders. I'm sure the quality of cell phone cameras will get better. Whats really sad is that they're already better quality than most security cameras. Maybe cell phone cams should get there own tag. CCAM maybe.

Posted by Dwaggy on 07-02-2006 12:42 PM:

this release is just ugh 2/1/?

__________________

i have sigs off

Posted by JHounds on 07-07-2006 08:06 PM:

How come there is no rating for the actual Maven release on this site?

::EDIT:: Try looking in the xvid section!! - NS::

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:51 PM.

Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 35 posts from this thread on one page