VCDQuality Forums - Superman Returns *PROPER* - CAM

Pages (5): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »
Show all 86 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Superman Returns *PROPER* - CAM - maVenssupplieR (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=70889)

Posted by Mongoloid on 07-01-2006 07:07 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by nxt
There are cell phones and smartphones and pdas etc.. that can do this. There's lots of phones that use either Memory Stick Duo, MiniSD, or SD Cards.

And NO, Motorola RAZR's are not the best phone in the world... it's more like the worst phone ever.

Well.. can't say it's the worst cell. in the world ever

Design-wise it's great, altho that ofcourse heavily depends on your personal taste.

My brother hated it so much that he gave it to me after 1 week of use. Loved the intended design instantly. Still do even.
After not getting any workable amount of RAM out of it after tweaking it heavily and using every trick in the book, I'll have to admit tho, that the phone sucks the donkey's ass if you use it for ANYTHING besides just making calls with it.
Extensive sms-ing will piss you off the moment you notice how few sms-messages it actually can store (received+sent), and even trying to actually read the display in daylight when it's a bit sunny will make you look like a blind bat. Pretty much having to know all stored phonenumbers by heart, in case the sun shines, isn't exactly userfriendly, but beats trying to look a number up in the phonebook, and hope you actually dial the person you want to speak, the moment you opt for trial&error based on approximate vicinity alphabet-wise in the phonebook.

In fact.. altho prolly not done in this thread (@mods: and I'll never do it again!), it gives me the opportunity to at least rate something, since the movie wasn't worthy enough imo :

ID - 9
PD - 1
EDU - 1

(ID = intended design / PD = practical design / EDU = every day usability)

And still, altho REALLY close in my book, it's not the worst cell. ever. If you have ever had an early Philips model, you'd know why. Philips had the decency to dissapear from the mobile phone-market completely with their own brand after a few true disaster-models. I don't wish the same to happen to Motorola because they have models that really are outstanding, but they clearly didn't test the RAZR at all - it's impossible to not notice it's "shortcommings".

Like this release (whooo! an opening to return to the actual release/subject this thread is dedicated to!!!). If the person/group releasing it would have actually watched their product, they would have seen as well that release-wise they created the RAZR amongst all encodes/releases. Bad bad bad bad bad.. yet not worst one I EVER saw - or is that just the positive side to myself, just thinking there has been stuff that has to have been worse than this - for all I care it should be in the top 10 worst releases ever on VCDQ.

Only option for this to not be a complete waste of my download and my time is to see a MST3K movie being made based on this.

MST3K - the VCDQ saga.

Posted by vkturbo on 07-01-2006 08:06 AM:

dont ya realise

hey guys people here are syaing they hated the movie how are you spose to get a decent idea of a movie when most of the experience is from good audio and visual. honestly i dont know how most people watch these shit releases let alone someone release the crap at all. i wish that these suppliers would come on here and see how their release rated i dont care if i have it first if its just gonna be shit i want the best release

Posted by watcherman on 07-01-2006 09:05 AM:

i do not know whats going on here,i thought it was a very good effort and i enjoyed the quality,i will give it 7 and 6 for sound and 9 for enjoyment,thanx for the release.
I better go now the nurse is coming,i have to take my pills,i hope they do not strap me to the bed again,i promised i will be good and will not try and strangle my room mate again.
The above statement is stupid just like the people who put out this release,for f***s sake get real,if not get bent.

V F##k all
A less than f##k all
M How the f##k do i know,as i could not watch it.

Posted by nakid on 07-01-2006 09:19 AM:

well there is one thing that is true about maVenssupplieR they are constant in there efforts..

They are constantly getting worse
They are constantly making a joke of themselves

Nothing is more better then consistancy..

So i'll keep my votes on there releases consistant.

vid 3 = pixelated to the MAX
aud 1 = only cause it was there
mov = duno.. nothing to watch yet...

Posted by V3NOM.NET on 07-01-2006 09:58 AM:

Another complete joke release from this so called group.

A - 2

V - 2

M - 3

Why even bother?

__________________

Posted by dvdhouse111 on 07-01-2006 10:45 AM:

a release that needs no more comments mr thinks

dvdhouse111....

ps remember what came after mavensuppliers Fand f 3 effort

Posted by me-self on 07-01-2006 12:10 PM:

Why would anyone want to re-encode this crap, if they did it would look worse then it already does.
V:3 (Just plain sucks)
Sditto)
F:? (should be a good film)

They call them selfs maven suppliers, lol, F&F was a HK silver with subs and was crap, maven's was a english release with good video.

Posted by BigDook on 07-01-2006 12:49 PM:

Am confused, i'm assuming rls groups have access to the bigger sites, and that allows them to rls stuff out quickly. Otherwise any Tom-Dick or Harry would be doing so.

If this is the case, how come grps like Mavensupplier etc haven't been dumped from the scene for rls absolute piles of garbage???

Just curious as to how shit like this can keep appearing.

Posted by Steeldrago on 07-01-2006 01:52 PM:

this is not mavens supplier!!
whenever you encode, you loose information, maven has a high quality source and keep it high quality." you cannot take garbage and turn it into a fine meal; It takes parts fresh ingredients to make a fine meal".

Posted by nic70 on 07-01-2006 01:57 PM:

mavensupplier claims 2 have seen mavens rls hea link

http://www.vcdquality.com/index.php?page=nfo&id=62493

plz tell me some1 else has seen it

Posted by neurotoxin on 07-01-2006 02:35 PM:

Is it a bird? Is It a plane? nope its a giant block of pixelated crap.

Posted by ol_perfesser on 07-01-2006 02:52 PM:

I'll give them props for speed, nothing for effort, since this looks to be a reencode of someone elses crap.
From sample, small screen size, highly pixillated, not worth rating.
I'll wait for something worth watching to use my bandwidth.

1/1/na

__________________
Op

Posted by Ergen on 07-01-2006 02:55 PM:

F*CK THIS QUALITY

F*CK THIS QUALITY !!!!!!
what kind of release is this you make the name maven(supplier) look crazy and f*ck you with this reencode release !!!!!!

Posted by z00mba on 07-01-2006 04:26 PM:

Waste of time, waste of bandwith... this shit is useless.

V: 1
A: 6
M: ? (will have to wait for a watchable version)

Posted by gourmetcat on 07-01-2006 04:43 PM:

maVensupplier; Go away already!

Not rating as it doesn't deserve a rating

Posted by ikghassassin on 07-01-2006 06:48 PM:

wait for mavens in 2 days or so, should be AMAZING..as for this, crap, crap, crap.

v: 2
a: 1
m: 8 loved it in theaters, just veryyyy long.

Posted by Sccmj23 on 07-01-2006 07:08 PM:

I definately think this rls isnt great, but its definately not terrible considering it was captured with a cell phone. if u have seen this movie at all then u DEFINATELY dont want to watch this copy. but if youve seen the movie b4 unfortunately this is all that is available right now. anyways, on to my rating

a-6, surprisingly good for a cell phone
v-4, only a little worse than average
m-8, great flick, go see it in the theatre if u want to enjoy it fully.

Posted by oxygenukx on 07-01-2006 08:52 PM:

maVen we need you

please come save the day

Posted by twistadrulerz on 07-01-2006 10:08 PM:

First of I am quite 100% sure that this aint a maVen rip as since its written maVenSupplier.

Anywayz I would thank firstly the ripper for what they have done but it wasnt upto the mark or atleast what expected would be!

V: 2 [i cant give more than that]
A: 1
M: 2 [didnt see anythin in the video so cant say :P]

Posted by Man_Of_Mystery on 07-01-2006 10:43 PM:

vcdquality or vcd quite shite

think that just about covers it.

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:52 PM.

Pages (5): « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »
Show all 86 posts from this thread on one page