VCDQuality Forums - Miami Vice *XViD* - TELESYNC

Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 48 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DIVX (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- Miami Vice *XViD* - TELESYNC - PUKKA (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=71499)

Posted by OAKside on 08-08-2006 10:41 PM:

Love this release, reminds of PUKKAs Pirates DMC internal. Very nice video quality, good audio. No big sync issues, all is well. And Mann wins.

V8 A7 M8

More info and pics -> Link

Posted by KaiKo on 08-09-2006 12:27 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by x1covers-mojo
I just watched the entire movie on my 61" Widescreen...no issues here...at all..best release to date....this is better than the Septic version as well....Nice rls!! Thanks

Video - 8
Audio - 8
Movie - 7 it was okay...lots of sex and drugs....but no rock and roll

this is the same source as SEPTiC's. i believe SEPTiC and PUKKA = the same or share sources. look at the garb in the nfo's about p2p.

Posted by vipper1oo7 on 08-09-2006 04:07 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by x1covers-mojo
I just watched the entire movie on my 61" Widescreen...no issues here...at all..best release to date....this is better than the Septic version as well....Nice rls!! Thanks

Video - 8
Audio - 8
Movie - 7 it was okay...lots of sex and drugs....but no rock and roll

ah dude it is the same version as the septic but just an xvid version thats y its 1 cd and not 3.
v 9 awsome video its sapose to be dark like that and even with it being a ts making it more dark it gives the movie more effect.
a 7.5 slight hiss and static in the beginning but then goes away and comes back from time to time
m 9 awsome movie loved the tv show and now love the movie, they could have done more with it. but then sometimes too much is no good. gotta love the 50 cal's that sh** was awesome.

edit: lol sorry about that kaio i just clicked quote next to the dudes post didnt even read all the posts until after i posed the same thing as you my bad

quote:
Originally posted by Squidman
Thanks to PUKKA for answering my plea about getting a decent full length of this that didn't sound like it was being captured by a "diet coke can". LOL - Enjoyed this one the most so far.

no its not a full release total run time is just under 2 hours and total real run time is 2 hours 20 mins

Posted by nwoidaho on 08-09-2006 04:53 AM:

The reason the TRT is shorter (1:59:14) than what is listed on nearly every other website (2h 20min) is because it's running at 25fps.

V: 7.5 Similar to Pukka's "Lady In The Water"

A: 7 Should be nuked because no matter what anyone says, you can't turn a MONO track into stereo with re-coding the audio.

M: Will watch this copy soon

Posted by RipBlippley on 08-09-2006 12:12 PM:

From sample 7/6/5

Saw the movie in theaters and hated it. Will watch this full rls again to give it a second chance.

__________________
Why pay?

Posted by sterio on 08-09-2006 03:13 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Mr Anarchy
Video is good but the audio is flawed like the recent Pukka releases in that it comes thru the rear speakers when converted to DVD format.
Easily fixed though.
V:8
A:7
M:6

how is this prob fixed?

Posted by tompoeze on 08-09-2006 04:03 PM:

can someone pls post jpeg???

Posted by hacktic on 08-09-2006 07:00 PM:

I watched the first 30 mins. Very good quality compared to the other releases. Definately watchable. Excellent job pukka, I look foward to your reases.

------------------------------------------------------------------

v:8 - A little overcropped at the bottom, grainy and the colors are a little washed out. I can't complain though, it's the best one out.

a:7 - Not the best but at least it's direct. I Played it in VLC switched it to mono and messed with the eq a little and got some pretty good sound out of it.

m: n/a - I watched the first 30 mins. and got bored so I turned it off. It seemed pretty good, though I expected more.

Posted by Mr Anarchy on 08-09-2006 07:29 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by sterio
how is this prob fixed?

Convert the audio to mono right using Goldwave or a similar package.

Posted by dsmerlin on 08-09-2006 08:08 PM:

very decent quality and sound is fine on pc..anyone help me converting this to dvd without getting scrambled sound plz?

Posted by chateau on 08-09-2006 08:20 PM:

[QUOTE]Originally posted by nwoidaho
[B]The reason the TRT is shorter (1:59:14) than what is listed on nearly every other website (2h 20min) is because it's running at 25fps.

You're not seriously suggesting that PUKKA has a film rate camera (23.976) that they then speed up to PAL (25) for their releases are you?

PAL DVD releases are shorter because of the framerate speedup, but cams are shot in the theatre. Unless there is some kind of mystical time warp thing happening, it's either missing some scenes or the credits are 20 minutes long.

Posted by Mr Anarchy on 08-09-2006 09:19 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by chateau
[QUOTE]Originally posted by nwoidaho
[B]The reason the TRT is shorter (1:59:14) than what is listed on nearly every other website (2h 20min) is because it's running at 25fps.

The correct running time is 134 minutes long which includes the credits

Posted by nwoidaho on 08-09-2006 09:51 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by chateau
[QUOTE]Originally posted by nwoidaho
[B]The reason the TRT is shorter (1:59:14) than what is listed on nearly every other website (2h 20min) is because it's running at 25fps.

You're not seriously suggesting that PUKKA has a film rate camera (23.976) that they then speed up to PAL (25) for their releases are you?

PAL DVD releases are shorter because of the framerate speedup, but cams are shot in the theatre. Unless there is some kind of mystical time warp thing happening, it's either missing some scenes or the credits are 20 minutes long.

Actually if PUKKA records the CAM source in PAL, the movie would be shorter in time compaired to the NTSC Total Run Time. NTSC has more frames per second so by nature would be a longer TRT because of the frame count.

More than likely during this PAL release, over the time of the movie, you could loose 10-13 minutes in NTSC realtime.
Without the credits, maybe 6-8 minutes, loosing 20 minutes of time compaired to the NTSC Total Run Time is possible.

Posted by kyk on 08-10-2006 06:28 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by nwoidaho
Actually if PUKKA records the CAM source in PAL, the movie would be shorter in time compaired to the NTSC Total Run Time. NTSC has more frames per second so by nature would be a longer TRT because of the frame count.

More than likely during this PAL release, over the time of the movie, you could loose 10-13 minutes in NTSC realtime.
Without the credits, maybe 6-8 minutes, loosing 20 minutes of time compaired to the NTSC Total Run Time is possible.

Are you retarded? Seriously. How would framerate at all affect the length of a movie? The only difference is the amount of times the picture changes within the same time period.

Posted by bcool2k on 08-10-2006 09:16 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by nwoidaho
Actually if PUKKA records the CAM source in PAL, the movie would be shorter in time compaired to the NTSC Total Run Time. NTSC has more frames per second so by nature would be a longer TRT because of the frame count.

More than likely during this PAL release, over the time of the movie, you could loose 10-13 minutes in NTSC realtime.
Without the credits, maybe 6-8 minutes, loosing 20 minutes of time compaired to the NTSC Total Run Time is possible.

Indeed i would agree with everything you have to say with a few exceptions. PUKKA has NEVER pred a Lady in the Water. That would be ORC and maVen or iCAM as seen in the intro b4 A Scanner Darkly. As for this film a bit too dark like maVen Lady in Water but light years better than any other copy out there. Congrats to SEPTIC/PUKKA for being the first to release this russian TS to the scene. This source was floating around several days before it hit.

Posted by minty on 08-10-2006 11:49 AM:

The best yet.. still a bit dark...
sounds quite hollow..
but watchable..

v7
a6
m7

Posted by chateau on 08-10-2006 04:22 PM:

well, this is getting off topic, but...

in the theatre, PAL and NTSC mean absolutely nothing. The movie runs along at 23.976 frames per second. That's progressive if you want to be picky. It's the same in every PAL country as it is in every NTSC country, because theatres don't use TV's to show their product. They use a film projector. Somebody comes along and sits down with a camera and starts shooting the movie. Their camera happens to shoot at 25 frames per second, because cameras are made to work with television systems (not theatres). They shoot the movie in real time because they're sitting there just like everybody else, and they haven't managed to figure out how to warp time yet, so the camera (or TS) is the same length as the actual movie release.

as stated earlier, the PAL shortening only applies to DVD releases where the studios actually do just speed up the film to 25 fps. For NTSC systems, the studios apply a 3:2 pulldown, which means they repeat half the frames twice and half the frames once in order ot get up to the 60 fields shown on NTSC televisions (12x2 + 12x3 = 60). By doing so, the NTSC DVD release is the same length as the actual film even though it's a very different framerate.

this release is dark but watchable. audio is excellent.

Posted by Xero on 08-10-2006 04:48 PM:

7/7/5

Movie could have been waaay better.
I'd give it a 9 if that Asian chick came with the release.

Posted by Blackrazor on 08-10-2006 10:27 PM:

Fixing the "rear speaker" audio.

Clerk 2, Pirates 2 and now Miami Vice all have this problem.

I am now using MainConcept H.264 encoder...In the audio options I just select "Mono" and encode to mpg or dvd format.

V-8
A-8 (after the mono fix)
M-7

Posted by coriy on 08-10-2006 10:51 PM:

mono right goldwave sorry i just havnt been able to figure this out could you please be more descriptive

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:11 PM.

Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 48 posts from this thread on one page