VCDQuality Forums Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 48 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- DIVX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- Silent Hill *XviD* - DVDRIP - DiAMOND (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=71536)


Posted by XtremeX on 08-11-2006 09:01 AM:

Re: dvdr

quote:
Originally posted by Cauhauna
dvdr has drop, dvd9 pre'd by Vapor and dvd5 pred by curious jotos: cj-sh-dvdr


How good are curious jotos?
With Diamond releasing the XviD it meant Replica would be releasing the DVDr. I cant help to think the DVDr by curious jotos gets us a crappy coppy in comparrison?


Posted by Merle on 08-11-2006 09:16 AM:

Common, for a movie like this, I was at least expecting AC3. And 607 kbps? That's all? An American Haunting (previous release) even had 915kbps... Now the video looks bit grainy. Not a bad effort, but I hope they do better next time!

v: 7.8
a:7
m:???? Waiting for an ac3 release


Posted by Cauhauna on 08-11-2006 09:19 AM:

unsure

CuriousJotos isn't too shabby, they do decent work. It's a 6 pass CCE Avg VBR 4000k. Menus reencoded Extras stripped (this is all stated in the nfo). Now that you have told me Rep will be rls'ing it, i'll probably hold off on burning the dvd.

Wouldn't they have to find a reason to proper the rls tho?


Posted by chiv on 08-11-2006 09:22 AM:

yep... guess diamond is under new management eh... hope this doesn't mean they'll continue making rubbish rips... hope this was just a one-off mistake... perhaps diamond was in a hurry, and forgot to change a few settings on their newbie autoripper program, and so made a 1cd rip, then just made up some bs in their nfo to justify it ill still get it, then just rip it myself when the dvd shows up at the rental store.

we can only hope diamond doesn't get their hands on mission impossible 3 or the third xmen film before another group does... id hate to see those as 1cd mp3 rips as well!


Posted by Merle on 08-11-2006 09:36 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by chiv
yep... guess diamond is under new management eh... hope this doesn't mean they'll continue making rubbish rips... hope this was just a one-off mistake... perhaps diamond was in a hurry, and forgot to change a few settings on their newbie autoripper program, and so made a 1cd rip, then just made up some bs in their nfo to justify it ill still get it, then just rip it myself when the dvd shows up at the rental store.

we can only hope diamond doesn't get their hands on mission impossible 3 or the third xmen film before another group does... id hate to see those as 1cd mp3 rips as well!



I totally agree, let's hope DoNE get's those movies before DIAMOND does... At least their dvdrips from big action or horror movies have ac3 and decent video bitrate


Posted by dontgiveafuck on 08-11-2006 09:59 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Merle
I totally agree, let's hope DoNE get's those movies before DIAMOND does... At least their dvdrips from big action or horror movies have ac3 and decent video bitrate


better be >640 rez + ac3

otherwise low rez 2cd is also crap


Posted by Merle on 08-11-2006 11:38 AM:

This version: Silent.Hill.2006.DVDRip.XviD.AC3.iNT-MoMo

is like 20x better


Posted by Redemption1980 on 08-11-2006 12:55 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Merle
This version: Silent.Hill.2006.DVDRip.XviD.AC3.iNT-MoMo

is like 20x better



Last time i grabbed a MoMo rip, it was encoded from the Downsampled DVDR, so although it might be AC3, vid quality could be worse, but things could have changed with MoMo since then.

I agree, i was dissapointed at a 1CD rip, but certain movies are very hard to make into 2CD's, yeah turning B-Frames off can help, but it dont help when scene rules dictate that the max resolution cant be say 720x304

This looks and sounds servicable enough anyway.

8/8/?


Posted by Merle on 08-11-2006 12:57 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Redemption1980
Last time i grabbed a MoMo rip, it was encoded from the Downsampled DVDR, so although it might be AC3, vid quality could be worse, but things could have changed with MoMo since then.

I agree, i was dissapointed at a 1CD rip, but certain movies are very hard to make into 2CD's, yeah turning B-Frames off can help, but it dont help when scene rules dictate that the max resolution cant be say 720x304

This looks and sounds servicable enough anyway.

8/8/?



Downloaded the MOMO version and looked overall much better then Diamond Release


Posted by levvy69 on 08-11-2006 04:09 PM:

Sweet Rip Diamond well done you never let us down
Vid - 9
Sound - 8
Movie - 9


Posted by Mr_Grinch on 08-11-2006 05:32 PM:

Decent enough release, more so than this film deserves. Pile of absolute shite.

For the extra bandwidth and quality increase personally I'd just stick with diamond's release.

__________________
<Mr_Grinch> yes. I have aids. Which I got from bumming men.


Posted by XtremeX on 08-11-2006 06:17 PM:

Re: unsure

quote:
Originally posted by Cauhauna
CuriousJotos isn't too shabby, they do decent work. It's a 6 pass CCE Avg VBR 4000k. Menus reencoded Extras stripped (this is all stated in the nfo). Now that you have told me Rep will be rls'ing it, i'll probably hold off on burning the dvd.

Wouldn't they have to find a reason to proper the rls tho?



Yea which is why I doubt they will
They would have though cos Diamond & Replica are the same group (so to speek).

Might get the dvd9 & do it myself...


Posted by oxygenukx on 08-11-2006 07:40 PM:

typical diamond release aka fantastic

10/9/?


Posted by barrywatt on 08-11-2006 08:43 PM:

This is yet another AMAZING Diamond rls. What I dont get is WTF are people giving this bad ratings when its a frickin DVDRIP?


Posted by Redemption1980 on 08-11-2006 10:46 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by barrywatt
This is yet another AMAZING Diamond rls. What I dont get is WTF are people giving this bad ratings when its a frickin DVDRIP?


Because the label DVDRip doesnt automatically warrant a perfect rating.

This is ok video wise, especially for the size, but could of and should of been better, and the audio is only 2 channel mp3, so that why the low ratings.


Posted by betelgeus on 08-12-2006 03:42 AM:

possibly a new encoder for diamond? 1cd bit of a mistake heavy pixelation,10's and 9's are way overated.

this one needed a 2cd.

8/8/?


Posted by chiv on 08-12-2006 05:47 AM:

its a pity theres so many diamond fanboys here artificially boosting the ratings and hyping it up when its quite a rubbish rip... yeah as the other guy said, for a 1cd rip of a 2 hour film, its pretty good... that doesn't mean diamond made the right choice making it such a low quality overall release...


Posted by mattylad on 08-12-2006 08:23 AM:

I'm no "fanboy" of any group but this looks fine to me. Picture's very good, sound is very good film is ok.

V - 9
A - 9
M - 7


Posted by z00mba on 08-12-2006 12:20 PM:

V: 8 - wtf?
A: 8
M: 6 - another crappy video games ported to the big screen, movie is boring to death


Posted by glowtraq on 08-12-2006 12:37 PM:

Great release by Diamond, I don't know about everyone else, but it's more cost effective and organized to have your xvid's divx's fit on one cdr.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:39 AM. Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 48 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.