VCDQuality Forums Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 42 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- DIVX (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- Mission Impossible III (2006) *XviD* - DVDRIP - CuriousJotos (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=72105)


Posted by GeneSimmons on 09-16-2006 03:47 PM:

I heard somewhere that there are missing subtitles from a key scene from the film. Can anyone confirm this?


Posted by Merle on 09-16-2006 04:05 PM:

I'm sorry to ask this, but what does ivtc stand for?


Posted by tollie on 09-16-2006 04:36 PM:

Inverse Telecine


Posted by dontgiveafuck on 09-16-2006 04:53 PM:

i don't think that jaggy shit at 3:20 is from encoding.

i think it was part of the movie. those bars or lines are really fat. and the water in the background doesn't have lines.

true interlacing should have many more lines, no?

It just seems like a cheap shaky cam was used to film that clip. to give it an effect as if you were sitting in the cockpit of the heli. notice the previous frames were from a sniper scope.

http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/...p2089666cl3.jpg


Posted by wrist on 09-16-2006 07:03 PM:

Been waiting for this and it doesn't dissapoint.

Pic 9 Very Nice
Sound 10 Awesome
Flik 8.5 Great pacing, awesome effects. Good all round Cruise flik. Blows the previous two away by a mile.

Super early much needed release. Thanx CJ.


Posted by treefingers1 on 09-16-2006 10:03 PM:

Question about subtitles

On another forum, someone mentioned that there was a fairly pivotal scene in this movie that requires subtitles. However, the subtitles in this release are not hard coded. Is this true? Does this movie require subtitles, and would I DVD release contain them?

Overall, the quality of this release is excellent. Nonetheless, I need to confirm this issue before I solidify my vote.


Posted by Avenue_1 on 09-16-2006 11:13 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Merle
I'm sorry to ask this, but what does ivtc stand for?


Inverse Telecining


Posted by pedantics on 09-16-2006 11:37 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by dontgiveafuck
true interlacing should have many more lines, no?

a bad itvc usually results in what looks like heat distortion, most noticable on diagnals and in scenes with lots of movement. you can see it here and there in this release.

you're right, though, the actual issue here might be due to the fact that the some scenes may have been shot on 1080i digital... making it almost impossible to pull out 24 progressive frames.


Posted by ILM on 09-17-2006 06:34 AM:

the lip reading subtitles are not hardcoded but they are in the subpack, just checked


Posted by chiv on 09-17-2006 08:55 AM:

couldn't this be resolved by looking at the dvdr at the same scene to see if it has the same issue?


Posted by frak on 09-17-2006 11:30 AM:

watched this on the TV tonight (57" Toshiba) -- that xvid dvd player I picked up recently is one of the better buys I've done recently.

Video quality is superb, colors, sharpness, etc. Might as well have been the retail dvd.

Audio is spot on.

Movie was entertaining.. not a big tom cruise fan, never was and his recent antics don't help matters.

anyhow:

v: 9.5
a: 8.5
m: 7.5


Posted by J|ngles on 09-17-2006 06:47 PM:

I'm pretty sure the scene that people are referring to (view from the helicopter) on CD2, it was meant to be like that, even if it wasn't it certainly didn't detract from the film and would only have noticed it because someone had mentioned it before I watched the release.

Apart from that everything was fine, video and audio were fantastic so thanks for the release.

Video - 9
Audio - 9
Movie - 8

A lot better than the other MI movies, seemed to be a genuine darkness about it compared to the usual Rogue agent thinking they're a genius and trying to get away with making millions of dollars.

All in all, fantastic release and a fantastic watch.

Thanks CJ.

__________________
J i n g l e s.


Posted by waterloo_suns on 09-17-2006 08:02 PM:

So which release is the best out of the three....CJ's, JUPit or MoMo?


Posted by Merle on 09-18-2006 07:18 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by pedantics
a bad itvc usually results in what looks like heat distortion, most noticable on diagnals and in scenes with lots of movement. you can see it here and there in this release.

you're right, though, the actual issue here might be due to the fact that the some scenes may have been shot on 1080i digital... making it almost impossible to pull out 24 progressive frames.



Thx for the explanation


@waterloo_sunset;

I think you should go for the CuriousJotos version. Don't know about the Jupit version though... Is it 3cd's??? If so, go for the 3cd's!

Made some screens:

momo version

http://img103.imageshack.us/img103/5676/mi31se6.jpg

CuriousJoto version

http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/4584/mi31es1.jpg


Posted by MacGyver_1 on 09-20-2006 04:54 AM:

Problem?

I tried to join the CD1 and CD2 AVIs. It crashes VirtualDub and NanDub.

Good quality though.

9/9/8


Posted by jheredia on 09-20-2006 06:22 AM:

so is the only scene that requires subtitles the one where he lip reads?

or are there others?

thanks, trying to setup the subtitle file without having to watch the entire movie


Posted by jyang on 09-20-2006 09:30 AM:

http://www.opensubtitles.org/en/sub...possible-iii-en


Posted by jyang on 09-20-2006 09:51 AM:

Don't know if it's ok to post links to subtitles, but, for the aXXo 1 cd rip:

http://www.opensubtitles.org/en/sub...possible-iii-en

just for the scene in question, it's at the 1 hr 15 min mark.


Posted by BIOHazard87 on 09-20-2006 08:57 PM:

2.35:1 ratio with that resolution??? wow.. weird release O_O


Posted by snausage on 09-20-2006 10:28 PM:

Internal Server Error

can't somebody just copy and paste it?


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:51 PM. Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 42 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.