VCDQuality Forums - Stuart Little 2 *READ NFO* - TELECINE

Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 33 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Stuart Little 2 *READ NFO* - TELECINE - VideoCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=7431)

Posted by ensain on 08-30-2002 03:36 PM:

Haha, its funny how VideoCD confess to not knowing the source. "At least UTi label their films correctly" thats because UTi actually know what the source is , because they were the ones that pressed "Record" in the theater. The closest VideoCD and the rest of their lamer groups have got to that feeling is when they hand their cash over to the man at the market every sunday morning. You try sneaking your (lack of) cameras into the theater, then I'll give you props. Until then, why give a shit about any release thats just taken from a pressed disc they obviously have no idea about, not even the source. Its funny seeing the words "SCREENER" etc tagged to the side of these releases, as if they had the actual VHS. VCDQuality should add a little logo for whenever a group uses an asian source. It'd probably be the most overused image on the site!

As for the release, who gives a fuck. If I wanted it I'd have got it from their sources, and not have to pay for the 2 CDRs.

The day the VCD scene gets any respect is the day that the 10mbits drops these pointless groups. Their sources cost less than a dollar to buy, and you get pressed discs and colour artwork. And if you don't know where to get these, then thats a shame. Maybe A-Team/VideoCD/MD etc should just release onto xdcc chans, as anyone higher up has no need for crappy asian rips.

RE:The whole adding a ticker/screener messages : no problems.

Props to TCF, UTi, TEG, and all the DVDRiP crews (both prerelease and classic) for actually making this scene an actual scene, not just a place where kids can race eachother for the same releases that OTHER people have made. I believe tNb do their own stuff (Ive not seen their releases) ? Well no matter what the quality, at least those guys gave it a shot, which is more than this group and the rest of the lamers will ever do.

Posted by whitehat on 08-30-2002 04:12 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ensain
as anyone higher up has no need for crappy asian rips.

you mean there's a better quality rip out on "the scene" now?

then >>shame on you, VideoCD, for releasing something into the scene that theres already a better quality rip of out to "the people who matter" <<

if not, then yes, there is a place even for "crappy asian rips", atleast for the people who apreaciate(sp?) them

__________________
Growing old is mandatory, growing up is optional.

Posted by K-FleX on 08-30-2002 06:02 PM:

ViDiEO CD ROX U FUCKEN MOFOS GET A FUCKEN LIFE IF U DUN LIKE THE QUALITY DONT DOWNLOAD BUH DONT TRASH THA GRP....THESE SCENE GRPS BRING U ALL THESE NICE MOVIES IN THE FIRST PLACE IF U THINK U CAN DO BETTER TRY BITCHES AND U WONT LAST A MOFO DAY

....EZZZ

VIDEO CD FOREVER

Posted by K-FleX on 08-30-2002 06:03 PM:

FuCK UTi They RLS shit after its not wanted ....FUCKEN CAMs

Posted by pHo on 08-30-2002 06:08 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by K-FleX
FuCK UTi They RLS shit after its not wanted ....FUCKEN CAMs

quote:
Originally posted by K-FleX
WTF this is the best cam i have ever seen .....UTi Rox when it comes to cams heh too bad tehy take a while for rlsing shit heh

otherwise amazing grp eZZZ

/me puts on his trollspotting vision

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

Posted by Dr. Poo PhD on 08-30-2002 06:11 PM:

I hadn't downloaded any other version of this movie, but wanted to wait so that my friend of the girl persuasion could catch a decent one and this one soundly sufficed for that. I'd say it's a 8/7/"don't really give a crap".

Thanks VideoCD. You made my life easier. If there were only bad versions of this movie to watch after promising to get her a good one, there would have been some indefinite sleeping in the doghouse. =(

Thanks for letting me sleep in my bed guys (and/or gals). =)

Posted by Azrael626 on 08-30-2002 06:40 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ensain
Haha, its funny how VideoCD confess to not knowing the source. "At least UTi label their films correctly" thats because UTi actually know what the source is , because they were the ones that pressed "Record" in the theater. The closest VideoCD and the rest of their lamer groups have got to that feeling is when they hand their cash over to the man at the market every sunday morning. You try sneaking your (lack of) cameras into the theater, then I'll give you props. Until then, why give a shit about any release thats just taken from a pressed disc they obviously have no idea about, not even the source. Its funny seeing the words "SCREENER" etc tagged to the side of these releases, as if they had the actual VHS. VCDQuality should add a little logo for whenever a group uses an asian source. It'd probably be the most overused image on the site!

Is it possible for you to be any more stupid? If you read that nfo properly, you'd clearly see that VideoCD said they didn't know what to label it because of the way the scene works. They said numerous times it was a TC, but also a pre-retail TC screener. Also, if you think this was an asian source, go look at Minority Report TC from TCF, that one has been out in asia for over a week. Do some fucking research before you spout off pointless stupid crap.

Posted by DarkBeatz on 08-30-2002 07:32 PM:

I don't know what I have to think about these releases anymore, it is very well possible this is from a genuine screener tape from the same source as xXx because both movies are from columbia pictures.. Secondly it is very easy to add a timer to a movie by yourself if you have the skills and the soft. But now start labelling screeners as telecines.. I don't think this is a improvement, when someone labels something as a screener you can expect a counter/mpaa warnings/blurred serials/.. but when someone labels something a telecine you except a genuine telecine (full screen) no serials/counters/warnings and all that shit just like the new telecine from minority report! Respect to TCF for superb releases and 99% of right labelling! when it comes from a real screener it stays a screener even if the video distributor got it from a telecine machine! Anyway respect to videocd for the great releases I do enjoy them and hope they keep the work up!

Posted by gallonFREAK on 08-31-2002 12:51 AM:

no need for 900 stuart littles!

its a fucking movie of a damn rodant, get a life

if you cant watch uti's with any problems, you must need to get a life, its a damn mouse...

nothing wrong with the sound or vid. on uti's

unless you people got walleye vision and waxed ears!

get a life, we dont need 900 versions of a mouse movie

Posted by Azrael626 on 08-31-2002 11:14 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by DarkBeatz
I don't know what I have to think about these releases anymore, it is very well possible this is from a genuine screener tape from the same source as xXx because both movies are from columbia pictures.. Secondly it is very easy to add a timer to a movie by yourself if you have the skills and the soft. But now start labelling screeners as telecines.. I don't think this is a improvement, when someone labels something as a screener you can expect a counter/mpaa warnings/blurred serials/.. but when someone labels something a telecine you except a genuine telecine (full screen) no serials/counters/warnings and all that shit just like the new telecine from minority report! Respect to TCF for superb releases and 99% of right labelling! when it comes from a real screener it stays a screener even if the video distributor got it from a telecine machine! Anyway respect to videocd for the great releases I do enjoy them and hope they keep the work up!

well first of all, I'm surprised your able to type with uti's dick so far down your throat, but on to another note. UTI's was a cam, granted there is no need for another cam or ts of this movie, but a TC screener? I definitely think it was a good rls to do, hell if you want to talk like that there was no need for a Minority Report TC or a Star wars Ep2 dvd..stfu gallon.

Posted by DarkBeatz on 08-31-2002 04:36 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Azrael626

well first of all, I'm surprised your able to type with uti's dick so far down your throat, but on to another note. UTI's was a cam, granted there is no need for another cam or ts of this movie, but a TC screener? I definitely think it was a good rls to do, hell if you want to talk like that there was no need for a Minority Report TC or a Star wars Ep2 dvd..stfu gallon.

Hey dickhead, I wasn't even talking about UTi, haven't mentioned their name at all, and I didn't say this release wasn't needed neither, I was just saying it should be called SCR and not TC..

Learn to read before you start to reply!!!!

Posted by Azrael626 on 09-01-2002 01:48 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by DarkBeatz

Hey dickhead, I wasn't even talking about UTi, haven't mentioned their name at all, and I didn't say this release wasn't needed neither, I was just saying it should be called SCR and not TC..

Learn to read before you start to reply!!!!

Your actually completely right Dark, I apologize, I was intending to quote Gallonfreak and I must have hit your post instead. My apologies.

Posted by DarkBeatz on 09-01-2002 03:18 PM:

By the way sorry for the dickhead, was just in a little wade of anger Wasn't ment really

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:04 AM.

Pages (2): « 1 [2]
Show all 33 posts from this thread on one page