VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- DIVX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- Harry Potter And The Order Of The Phoenix *XViD* - TELECINE - mVs (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=78175)

V: 6
A: 5
M: 9

Poor
5/4/6

Horrible TC (if it is one). This couldn't even pass as a great TS... unless it came out back in early July.

5/4/9

The R5 is due out soon so wait.

__________________
Why pay?

As horrible as this rls seems to most, it's still better by far then the CAM and TS versions out there...

No flickering, consistent video quality and steady sound (although low and lifeless...).


6/7/7.5

rating this is interesting, cause I would have to rate it as such in 2 ways

mVs release as TC;

V: 4
A: 5
M: 8


mVs release as TS;

V: 8 almost 9
A: 7
M 8

I know serveral different places that have taking this copy of the movie and fixed it up as mentioned before.

I found these images on a site that compares the 2

http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/2025/harrypotheadtccmpqi2.jpg

Oppps forgot, according to website, mVs is on left, and the other on right!

__________________

Star Wars is The Movie to watch, EPIII The Birth Of The DEATHSTAR The Planetsmasher

oh come on it isnt 2 versions, its simply the member who did the re encode stating it as a ts becuase they felt mVs wasnt a tc, so no point given the piuc sample.

quite bright or are they the screen shots i keep seeing.
audio is extemely low
not sharp for a tc would normally be but its better than every release out there on the SCENE .

a-4
m-7
v-6

Video - Seems like a poor quality TC along the lines of Doom or The DaVinci Code TC's we saw. The light scenes work quite well, but when it goes dark, it seems to loose a lot of defination, and gives it a very "cammish" effect.
I give it a 6

Audio - Crappy, but at least it's in synch and is listenable
6.5

Movie - Eh; Had some great parts, but others seemed quite rediculous, and were "loose interpretations" of the novel. The ending also seemed a bit "lacking", but I'd still give this one a 7.