VCDQuality Forums Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 44 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- DIVX (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=23)
-- Rambo *REPACK* *XViD* - WORKPRINT - CAMERA (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=80042)


Posted by KoOlMoVieS on 02-02-2008 02:13 AM:

Quality: 7
Sound: 7
Movie: 8

Either I didn't want this movie to end so soon or this movie is very short.


Posted by Megalith on 02-02-2008 02:28 AM:

7/8/9

Is it just me, or is the theatrical version even bloodier? I think I enjoyed the German release more, but the audio of the workprint is obviously superior.


Posted by takwhori on 02-02-2008 08:59 AM:

I remember hiring First Blood on VHS when it first came out.

Quarter of a century ago.

I feel old.


Posted by d_dog on 02-02-2008 01:16 PM:

Pretty blocky and slightly washed out in my opinion.

V - 3
A - 7
M - ? (Not watching a rip of this low quality, workprint or not.)


Posted by whopper on 02-02-2008 04:59 PM:

v 6
a 7
m 8

pretty good 4th part - i´m hoping for an extended version, 80min were over in a blink............


Posted by brows181 on 02-02-2008 06:35 PM:

Diecent Quality. V-7, A-8, M-6. Useless Plot, But Violent and Brutal, isnt that what we all want? :P

__________________
Sharing is the way of life. Be kind to your neighbors. Share all the movies you can:P.


Posted by the red on 02-02-2008 08:32 PM:

video pretty good whoever give it 3 should have gone to specsavers videos a bit dark and washed but for early release very good film for anyone who likes sly also very good
v.7.5 watermark doesnt bother tou after 5 mins
a.8 nice and loud
m.8
thanks to camera for the up

__________________
paul scholes he scores goals MUFC


Posted by MrBrains on 02-02-2008 09:58 PM:

Thought id add my post on this one, movie was ok kinda still looks like the 80s rambo movies but more blood. Pretty shocking in parts with legs and heads missing never saw this on the 80s version but the style is the same. Movie is to short and plot is not great. Colours could be nicer as very slightly faded but still plays all the way, noticed a couple of sync isses but nothing major and more near the end where the all the action is happening. Good work Camera.

__________________
MrBra!ns


Posted by smythe on 02-02-2008 11:33 PM:

v-9
a-9
f-7

the video is pretty good watched full film
audio is spot on why some peeps have rated 6/7 im unsure

for a workprint this is very good no flicker at all ...

if truth is known this is actaully a screener

smythe


Posted by dvdhouse111 on 02-02-2008 11:34 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by d_dog
Pretty blocky and slightly washed out in my opinion.

V - 3
A - 7
M - ? (Not watching a rip of this low quality, workprint or not.)




3 for vid????

yes there is text all the way through but 3??? get real lol


dvdhouse


Posted by ChrisB33 on 02-03-2008 02:35 PM:

v - 7 (decent pic...watermark is HUGE and annoying)
a- 8 spot on
m- 8 great flick

really enjoyed this, stallone looks great for 60 !

__________________
Same Shit...Different Day


Posted by sp1n1tb0y on 02-03-2008 05:20 PM:

Video = 7.5 (for a WP - streamed thru xbox360, and looked good)
sound = 6.5 (Still out of sync in places, but doesn't ruin the film)
Movie = 6.5 - Never saw the original rambo movies, even though i grew up in the 80's! This is ok, lots of gore with limbs flying off etc, plot is a bit weak, but i suppose you really know what your asking for when u go to watch a Rambo movie.

Congrats on gettin the Workprint.... first 1 of 2008!


Posted by skindog on 02-03-2008 05:47 PM:

V:- 7 slightly washed out, other than that good.

A:- 9 Sounds very decent to me, no distortion, very clear throughout the range.

M:- Probably most violent film I have ever seen, which I like. WAY better than I was expecting. Well done Stallone.


Posted by jrw on 02-03-2008 07:43 PM:

V 6.5 Low res hurts it , darker scenes lack detail , colors a bit off, watchable but borderline. (judged from viewing on a 50" Kuro plasma via X360).

A 7.5 Not to shabby but could be a lot better.

M 8 Better than I expected. Watched from start to finish. Extremely violent at times, ill definitely be picking up the Bluray


Posted by dariusgw on 02-03-2008 07:57 PM:

Video 7 Not the clearest, but definitely watchable
Audio 8 Sounds good to me
Movie 9 Not the biggest Rambo fan, but this movie is intense! Watching people get blown up throughout the movie was expected, but I tell you it's a must watch!


Posted by SalltyNutz on 02-04-2008 08:32 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by d_dog
Pretty blocky and slightly washed out in my opinion.

V - 3
A - 7
M - ? (Not watching a rip of this low quality, workprint or not.)



V-3 ? lol sure take off a couple points for the lettering on bottom but as for blockiness try watching it on tv as dvd .... it looks excellent


Posted by boozer on 02-04-2008 11:37 PM:

V - 6
A - 7
M - 8


Not a bad release, very watchable, though not the best video for a workprint,.... if you dont have it yet then i would wait untill the 21st of Feb... theres a R5 due out around that time


Posted by frak on 02-05-2008 09:55 AM:

Watched this on the TV.

Video was good, a little washed out and not that crisp, but very watchable.

Audio was very good.

Movie was good -- I'm a big Sly fan and like seeing him come back with this film and Rocky.. stuff I grew up on. He's still in great shape for his age.

v: 7
a: 8
m: 7


Posted by RipBlippley on 02-06-2008 10:30 AM:

Here's a REAL REVIEW:

I saw this opening weekend in the theater. It does not have vivid color. It was shot with low color to give it a more grainy feel. The so-called "workprint" is the same as the full theatrical version...... but this wp version is missing a few cgi shots where blood is seen (when rambo shoots the guy with an arrow and he falls on the mine). In the theater/real version a big blood "fountain" is seen but in the wp it's missing. It's not a big deal. The wp and theatrical version are the SAME. YOU ARE MISSING NOTHING!

v8 (watched on 32lcd and 60dlp - video is nice)
a9 (sound is great. no complaints)
m8 (i loved it. stallone did a good job bringing rambo back and also putting him to bed. i don't think we'll see rambo again.... this was a good way to finish it all off just like he finished off rocky.)

__________________
Why pay?


Posted by burnside on 02-06-2008 10:35 AM:

I dunno, it looks okay but the horrid ATARI font (which never goes away) at the bottom bugs the shit out of me.

7
8
?

might just have to wait, even tho i heard this movie is way better than AvPr.


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:57 AM. Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 44 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.