VCDQuality Forums - Red Dragon *SVCD* - TELESYNC

Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 47 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Red Dragon *SVCD* - TELESYNC - ECO (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=9175)

Posted by sevve on 10-03-2002 11:05 AM:

thanx alot man

Posted by PhreakerX on 10-03-2002 12:38 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by someth1ng
Funny you asked that cuz you just posted two posts that had nothing to do with the quality. hehe

no one understands sarcasm these days...

__________________
"I love the Power Glove. Its so bad."

Posted by devilbeast on 10-03-2002 01:44 PM:

quality isnt good but like some sauid before the sound is good, maybe someone can hook the sound up from this one and the video from ftf's and we'd be set on a decent rls but hopin we get a screener from the awards.

Posted by j0h2n on 10-03-2002 03:20 PM:

Thats one fucked up nfo .

Posted by bmvtoys on 10-03-2002 06:44 PM:

hmmm *sucksdick* now that is how a release should be rated. This made my day. I'm surprised Mystic didnt catch that yet.

I give the release a 0/3/- Didn't like the movie enough to rate the flick itself.

b

Posted by desertboy on 10-03-2002 07:03 PM:

Votes for Red Dragon *SVCD* *SUCKSDICK* DONT CHANGE by ECO
These were the votes as of 18:00 (UK time) 3/10/2002 just in case anyone was intrested and before anyone else has a chance to edit theirs.

moviedan713 10/9/8
nightmare_1 1/1/1
h0gw1ld 1/1/10
monots 1/1/1
westside-homie 10/10/10
SneakySix 7/8/8
dc_man 1/6/10
crob 1/1/10
tko248 1/1/9
Trenton_1 4/8/9
M3RICK 1/2/2
PetahHFX 1/1/1
AgGz 10/10/10
Movieguy 1/5/10
desertboy 4/4/8
reefer420 10/10/10
Swimj 1/1/n/a
ownlos 10/10/10

maybe 3 or 4 real ratings at top out of 18 votes now maybe the madness can stop, I'll post a list of offenders from now on for the cause, real ratings.

PS I just noticed westside homie voted 10/10/10 for most of the ateams releases, maybe a member!

Just added the new votes, seperated the newbies from the real voters, still a lot of you newbies, hey ace1, doggy & westb0b for example. Killfxp you liked this film a lot didn't you.

Neversoft 5/4/7
Velocity 2/5/8
ghEtto^ghOst 7/5/10
Cory 5/4/9
IsoFAST 4/3/8
crayon 4/6/n/a
Dr. Poo PhD 5/7/10
PhAnToMs 7/9/5

ace1 1/1/1
DoGGy 1/1/6
Wesb0b 1/1/10
Rival 1/1/1
killfxp 10/10/10
SirhcMan 1/1/n/a
pyarhua 10/n/a/10

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.

Posted by bmvtoys on 10-03-2002 07:11 PM:

that's why I only posted on the board. I felt as if I posted my horrible rating it would make things worse (than what I said of course).

Ib

Posted by Stampers on 10-03-2002 07:55 PM:

I never realised that, been looking through some old posts to see who doesn't know how to vote! Nice post desertboy

Posted by IsoFAST on 10-03-2002 08:00 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by desertboy
Votes for Red Dragon *SVCD* *SUCKSDICK* DONT CHANGE by ECO
These were the votes as of 18:00 (UK time) 3/10/2002 just in case anyone was intrested and before anyone else has a chance to edit theirs.

moviedan713 10/9/8
nightmare_1 1/1/1
h0gw1ld 1/1/10
monots 1/1/1
westside-homie 10/10/10
SneakySix 7/8/8
dc_man 1/6/10
crob 1/1/10
tko248 1/1/9
Trenton_1 4/8/9
M3RICK 1/2/2
PetahHFX 1/1/1
AgGz 10/10/10
Movieguy 1/5/10
desertboy 4/4/8
reefer420 10/10/10
Swimj 1/1/n/a
ownlos 10/10/10

maybe 3 or 4 real ratings at top out of 18 votes now maybe the madness can stop, I'll post a list of offenders from now on for the cause, real ratings.

i added my vote to the list, a decent one.

what are these 1/1/1 and 10/10/10 these people on dope?

Posted by Bud-man on 10-03-2002 09:54 PM:

My opinion if it isnt a DVD source why make it SVCD?..even a quality made VCD ripped from DVD looks as good as a SVCD..waste of hard drive and discs

Posted by Redemption on 10-03-2002 11:06 PM:

Pretty poor and a waste of 3CD's, but hey ive saw worse.

quote:
My opinion if it isnt a DVD source why make it SVCD?..even a quality made VCD ripped from DVD looks as good as a SVCD..waste of hard drive and discs

Huh, thats pure bullshit and you know it, a SVCD TS can look good, and saying a VCD looks as good as a SVCD is laughable.

True original VCD's can look really good, but SVCD is far better.

This just under 2 hours, they should have made it 2 CD's and just ran it through an extra couple of passes.

Posted by AgGz on 10-03-2002 11:40 PM:

FAGGITS

i'm really starting to get pissed off with this forum....all you stupid retards flamin this new group....its a new group give them a chance woww this isn't a rencode if u take the time to look at it and not just the jpg u can figure that out...it could have been the same source as ftf but whos noes its no rencode...as for the svcd issue i think svcd is better...read the nfo "we decided to do svcd becuz its a kickass movie and it deserves it" and you no wat they are totally right..i dun't understand u ppl the ftfs version color was all faded and the sound dun't even get me started on that...if the name on this rls read C*T*P* u would all be shooting a load in ur pants and all screamin...this is 20x better than ftfs...and take it cuz its for free and its 4 days b4 the movie is in theathers so u all should STFU!!!

Posted by djkoolaide on 10-03-2002 11:45 PM:

RECODE!!

Posted by PopSicko on 10-04-2002 12:39 AM:

Looks like all the A-Team and FTF dick-smokers are sure showing there asses now...that's TOO funny. Same people who vote for themselves for employee of the month as well I bet.

This remake is way better than the original 1986 Michael Mann cock-up. 5/5/8...

Posted by MrBoogedy on 10-04-2002 02:08 AM:

Actual Quality

So does this release have better sound than the FTF one? From the posts it seems it does, but from the rating board, the sound is rated waaaaaay lower.

Also, the jpegs certainly look like they've got better color than the FTF, so is the video on this actually worse than FTF? Or does it have such a shitty low quality rating simply because it's a 3CD SVCD TS (which is unecessary)?

Can somebody actually compare the two releases for me, regardless of format or size, just compare the quality if I were to sit down and watch both of them side by side, which one is better?

Posted by IsoFAST on 10-04-2002 06:21 AM:

nuked everywhere

visit

http://www.nforce.nl/nfos/index.php

nforce shows nuked, that means every topsite nuked it.

Posted by crob on 10-04-2002 10:25 AM:

What the freak is a topsite?! Everyone keeps on going on about them!!!

Posted by sevve on 10-04-2002 10:38 AM:

thanx

Posted by ShifTeR on 10-04-2002 11:40 AM:

Re: nuked everywhere

quote:
Originally posted by IsoFAST

nforce shows nuked, that means every topsite nuked it.

lol, no that just means one person who updates nforce nuked it. course i can't find it on any respectable site, which must say something ...

Posted by desertboy on 10-04-2002 12:22 PM:

Re: FAGGITS

quote:
Originally posted by AgGz
i'm really starting to get pissed off with this forum....all you stupid retards flamin this new group....its a new group give them a chance woww this isn't a rencode if u take the time to look at it and not just the jpg u can figure that out...it could have been the same source as ftf but whos noes its no rencode...as for the svcd issue i think svcd is better...read the nfo "we decided to do svcd becuz its a kickass movie and it deserves it" and you no wat they are totally right..i dun't understand u ppl the ftfs version color was all faded and the sound dun't even get me started on that...if the name on this rls read C*T*P* u would all be shooting a load in ur pants and all screamin...this is 20x better than ftfs...and take it cuz its for free and its 4 days b4 the movie is in theathers so u all should STFU!!!

Wait a minute didn't you vote 10/10/10 for this movie, who's really the lame ass fuck, you for your lame asss ratings I mean 10/10/10 I only saw the sample but this aint no 10 not by a long long shot. Stop being so lame, you're surely either a group member which is pretty lame (Quality speaks for itself) or a stupid newbie.

FOOOOOOOOL

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:55 PM.

Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 47 posts from this thread on one page