VCDQuality Forums Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 52 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- xXx *REAL* - SCREENER - VXr (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=9816)


Posted by Redemption on 10-17-2002 06:29 PM:

Is this worth getting, ive downloaded every screener recently and ive spent enough time on this computer.

Is the pic clear throughout is there a lot of blocking, is the sound Mono or stereo, and by stereo i mean different sound from each speaker, and is the film as bad as everyone is saying, ive already got Video CD's TS and screener and a DIVX TS i got of edonkey, which was the best the best release of this so far, and the original source of A-Teams release i think, and i still havn't watched it yet.


Posted by Max Payne on 10-17-2002 08:45 PM:

Hmm dont see no shit on the jpg


Posted by SeeDee on 10-17-2002 11:37 PM:

*NUKE* poor quality

poor standards by vxr's quality.

serial block is bad. there are better filters for vdub than this.

also picture is very noisy. well below screener expectations.

stick with videocd tc for now

shame as i like vxr.

4/8/6

get a better encoder


Posted by svenbob on 10-18-2002 01:13 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by mew
Sigh...isonews n00bs, why do I even waste my time here I wonder.


go back to isonews then... leave, we dont want you here

__________________
One time, my cousin Walter got this cat stuck in his ass. True story. He bought it at our local mall so the whole fiasco wound up on the news, it was embarrassing for my relatives and all, but the next week he did it again, different cat, same results, complete with another trip to the emergency room! So I run into him a week later in the mall and he’s buying another cat and I says to ‘em "Jesus Walt, what are you doing? You know your just gonna get this cat stuck up your ass too, why don’t you knock it off?" And he says to me "Brodie, how the hell else am I supposed to get the gerbil out?" My cousin was a weird guy....

-


Posted by eST0r on 10-18-2002 03:37 AM:

Hmm, this was a good release by them, the quality was good. VXr is keeping up. I don't see why any of you guys can complain. The sound is good on this, so there is some noise but it's no where near the quality of V-CD's rls or A-Teams for that matter. I'd have to say it wasn't the BEST VXr has done in the past, but I do know this release was good. Stop complaining. FFS

__________________

"Where can I download TheChosenFew version of 8 mile? I dont use irc, its too complicated, i need simplicity" - XeroFightsAlone


Posted by LuDes on 10-18-2002 06:42 AM:

Very nice release .. I just watched the movie it was pretty good.. I had the a-team release but the qual was not at all up to par for a screener.. so i held out

8/9/7


Posted by Asterisk on 10-18-2002 09:22 AM:

Encoding could have been a bit better, but the sound is brilliant.

7/8/7.


Posted by frak on 10-18-2002 10:25 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Redemption
Is this worth getting, ive downloaded every screener recently and ive spent enough time on this computer.

Is the pic clear throughout is there a lot of blocking, is the sound Mono or stereo, and by stereo i mean different sound from each speaker, and is the film as bad as everyone is saying, ive already got Video CD's TS and screener and a DIVX TS i got of edonkey, which was the best the best release of this so far, and the original source of A-Teams release i think, and i still havn't watched it yet.




The quality of this one certainly looks better then the last "supposed" screener release.

However, the movie - which could have been good, sucks.

-frak


Posted by Crazy_Jay on 10-18-2002 11:16 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by phucker
Hmm, this was a good release by them, the quality was good. VXr is keeping up. I don't see why any of you guys can complain. The sound is good on this, so there is some noise but it's no where near the quality of V-CD's rls or A-Teams for that matter. I'd have to say it wasn't the BEST VXr has done in the past, but I do know this release was good. Stop complaining. FFS


For Once I agree with you. Very well said.


Posted by mew on 10-18-2002 12:11 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by svenbob


go back to isonews then... leave, we dont want you here



Can't you even read properly? I was expressing my irritation over isonews n00bs and you want me to go to isonews?


Posted by Redemption on 10-18-2002 12:12 PM:

This is as good as most VCD VHS screeners, it might look a little blocky at times, but most VCD does, but the sound is stereo and is clear and sounds good through a Dolby Surround setup.

Think i'll go watch it now, to see if its as bad as everyone says.


Posted by VCDz on 10-18-2002 02:44 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by SeeDee
*NUKE* poor quality

poor standards by vxr's quality.

serial block is bad. there are better filters for vdub than this.

also picture is very noisy. well below screener expectations.

stick with videocd tc for now

shame as i like vxr.

4/8/6

get a better encoder



Thats pretty bad to compain about one of VXr's good screener's. Next thing you'll be complaining about is TCF's High Quality DVDRips (SVCD), when there really isn't anything wrong with them.


Posted by nokia on 10-18-2002 04:26 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by SeeDee
*NUKE* poor quality

poor standards by vxr's quality.

serial block is bad. there are better filters for vdub than this.

also picture is very noisy. well below screener expectations.

stick with videocd tc for now

shame as i like vxr.

4/8/6

get a better encoder

Poor quality? So you'd rather watch vigilante's, oops i mean videocd's LOWER quality tc. I mean this may not be the best but it's pretty decent, I guess everyone is just getting use to higher quality that even the decent ones get picked on.


Posted by mrindeed on 10-18-2002 06:00 PM:

Props for the release,

but im sorry for a screener the quality isnt very nice at all.

6/6/8


Posted by SeeDee on 10-18-2002 06:36 PM:

respect the constructive criticism or go play with yourselves in the chatrooms.

how else are they able to better themselves.

as said in my previous posts bad film for vxrs standards. hence the relevant nukes on rated sites.

now leave me alone, and be constructive, not retarded. this is a film quality forum, not what you or your boyfriend may think of my comment.

If only more people took this advice. btw no further replies from me on this topic


Posted by mew on 10-19-2002 03:34 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by nokia
Poor quality? So you'd rather watch vigilante's, oops i mean videocd's LOWER quality tc. I mean this may not be the best but it's pretty decent, I guess everyone is just getting use to higher quality that even the decent ones get picked on.


I knew it, you cant even tell one group from another, you're as ignorant as I suspected.


Posted by nokia on 10-19-2002 07:25 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by mew


I knew it, you cant even tell one group from another, you're as ignorant as I suspected.

If you knew anything, you'd know videocd members consist of vigilante/extreme/aszeon/vcdistro guys and of course videocd's own crew. All the subpar groups combined to make a DECENT (at best) group.


Posted by torxxx on 10-19-2002 08:09 AM:

Better rip then the rest of the XXX rls out there. The picture is a little blurry for a screener. The audio is great though compared to the other rips.

5/8/5


Posted by CYBERKILLERUK on 10-19-2002 12:30 PM:

XXX better than a porn film


Posted by HawkSE on 10-19-2002 05:20 PM:

This is best version available. Nuked or not...


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:17 AM. Pages (3): « 1 [2] 3 »
Show all 52 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.