VCDQuality Forums Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »
Show all 87 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- 8 Mile *PROPER* - TELESYNC - ECO (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=11065)


Posted by astrostock on 11-16-2002 07:35 AM:

This one is way better than FTF's. Good to see another, more watchable release.

7/7/10

__________________
Will they censor ******** if I put it in my Signature?


Posted by iopf on 11-16-2002 07:45 AM:

i hate fullscreen and especially fullscreen bootlegs. Ive been spoiled latley with the widescreen rls lately (at least the movies i wanted to watch) that i forgot about these croppers. I mean with a screener i can deal because that means some panning was done but nothin pisses me off more when there is action going on "off camera" I just looked at jpgs and am not even gonna bother wasting my precious bandwidth on the sample even.


Posted by brr8760 on 11-16-2002 07:46 AM:

quote:
Rated 8 Mile Proper by eco
RaPpA 6 5 10

And Ftf Version...
RaPpA 5 3 n/a
Actually, RaPpA got it about right-- maybe a little high for FTF's version-- I say 4/2-- and he had the decency not to rate a movie he hadn't seen. All in all, I'm not sure what the poster's point was.

REVIEW: Full screen, which sucks because we're missing 33% of the picture. Very sharp picture, bright enough, okay colors. Sound is very good, MUCH better than the previous version. Movie looks like a winner.

All in all, ECO has given us the first watchable version of 8 Mile, and they deserve major props from all.

__________________
November 2, 2004. America shoots itself in foot, re-elects Bush. Recovery to take decades. Stay tuned.


Posted by panasony3 on 11-16-2002 07:59 AM:

it's a watchable release and the main diference IMHO is that the audio is much better than the ftf's release, which we tried to watch and couldn't concetrate.
I hope at least that c-p-t doesn't dupe this nice release.
i can't understand how come ftf never made an awesome release with all the flood of releases. i honestly couldn't stand an entire movie of ftf's even red dragon which i'm not sure if it was ftf's fault or that the godamn movie was too talky.


Posted by [RaZoR] on 11-16-2002 10:37 AM:

clear & sharp pic , good audio

7/8/?

__________________
no idea


Posted by desertboy on 11-16-2002 12:46 PM:

Question

never bothered with FTF's release it looked shit from the jpegs and the couple of reviews I read amongst the crap put me off. This isn't too bad, 7/6/6.

I wonder PHO did you edit my post about CT-P in the jackass thread or was I just pissed and forgot to actually post it.

__________________
You're only in as much trouble as you think you are.


Posted by aXs-SVCD on 11-16-2002 02:38 PM:

Mmmmm I don't know what to say Cam is Cam but sounds better the FTF Looks Better then FTF so i downloaded, but still FTF is doing there job and i am happy from both groups that released this movie !

ECO Keep up the Good job,

__________________
Lets See What's New Today
( VCDQUALITY ROCKS )

OK, Please Stop asking for Movies, and Go and find it.


Posted by Packet_Kiddie on 11-16-2002 03:01 PM:

To: Anyone bitching about the ECO video quality

I've seen a post or two claiming that they liked FTF's video better but the sound here better... There's a simple solution!

Just take the audio here and re-encode it with the FTF video.

It's not hard, but you'll have to merge the video back from 2 segments into 1 for each release first (so you have a contiguous video sample and a contiguous audio sample to work with).

Just some advice, that's all.


Posted by reverend on 11-16-2002 03:30 PM:

Thanks brr8760 for actually postin a useful review


Posted by torxxx on 11-16-2002 03:37 PM:

Swim J why do you alaways have to be a bitch, and talk shit?
fuck you and your momma


Posted by MacMall88 on 11-16-2002 04:59 PM:

is the SVCD better, did anyone get their hands on that 1?


Posted by Superxero on 11-16-2002 05:33 PM:

wow this rls is great it looks live that lilo and stitch kickass telesync the sound is kickass and the video is good but not great im gonna get my hands on the svcd rls as soon as i can...

OVERALL SCORE!



sound:8.7
video:6.4
Movie:10.10

__________________


Posted by lo.pro on 11-16-2002 06:18 PM:

Re: cropped.....NO

quote:
Originally posted by AgGz
nope this wasn't cropped this is 100% pure full screen just spoke to some ppl in the group the ws svcd has borders added

fine rls eco


don't be dumb, of course it's cropped. what does "pure full screen" mean in regards to a TS?? have you ever been to a theatre and seen a movie projected at 4:3?

any FS that was once a theatrical release is cropped (or else has bad AR).

if ECO actually did say that their WS is the same, but with borders added, that just means that the "WS" is cropped, too.

__________________

This perceived misuse of Internet resources caused former Dutch education minister Loek Hermans to comment: "It would be nice if the students at Twente University would use their fast connections for information and education purposes, instead of downloading huge amounts of porn."


____________________________________ knowing is the easy part _____________


.


Posted by dabig73 on 11-16-2002 07:15 PM:

Angry sound QT

man whats up with the audio it's like someone has a ticking bomb or something any advice on how to get rid of the shi.

holla
B-out


Posted by AgGz on 11-16-2002 07:31 PM:

Re: Re: cropped.....NO

quote:
Originally posted by lo.pro

don't be dumb, of course it's cropped. what does "pure full screen" mean in regards to a TS?? have you ever been to a theatre and seen a movie projected at 4:3?

any FS that was once a theatrical release is cropped (or else has bad AR).

if ECO actually did say that their WS is the same, but with borders added, that just means that the "WS" is cropped, too.




your really dumb seriouly.
how could it be croped lol, i dunno about you but if no of a dv cam that records in ws can u let me no the model number of it cuz i would wanna buy it myself. when i said it wasn't croped i meant that when they capped it from their soucre they did put it in to vdub or tmpg and crop parts off, and as for the widescreen the only way to get a NON dvdrip to widescreen is to add borders becuz on a ts its only gunna show up as how it was shot with the cam on a dvdrip u have options when u rip it to take away the bars or leave them cuz the movie already had bars and it was taken from its digital source that was already widescreen.

this is a great rip once again i'll say
and the svcd ws is even better they just didn't wanna rls it cuz you all cried like babies last time they did svcd


Posted by petrocs on 11-16-2002 07:33 PM:

ut oh..its getting all ghetto up in here...

i see a gang war (of words) brewin


Posted by polster on 11-16-2002 07:34 PM:

Wink

very nice quality 7 / 8 / 8


Posted by pHo on 11-16-2002 08:17 PM:

Re: Re: Re: cropped.....NO

quote:
Originally posted by AgGz



your really dumb seriouly.
how could it be croped lol, i dunno about you but if no of a dv cam that records in ws can u let me no the model number of it cuz i would wanna buy it myself.



1. lo.pro knows a hella lot about shit, so you're really arguing with the wrong person
2. my DV cam shoots in letterbox and anamorphic widescreen without any problem at all, as do most these days.

edit :: i got bored and decided to prove it, as i've never been arsed with anamorphic shooting before.

http://vcdq.5u.com/widescreen.gif

the image is squeezed when viewed on the 4:3 viewfinder on the camera, then on edit the image comes out in 16:9 widescreen.

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot


Posted by rappa on 11-16-2002 08:52 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ghEtto^ghOst
Great release, quality is pretty awesome and the sound is damn good. For them to be able to rip audio like that from a movie that's 2 weeks old ... It has to be good :P ... I'll get flamed for that.

Neways....this shit I just don't understand:

Rated 8 Mile Proper by eco
RaPpA 6 5 10

And Ftf Version...
RaPpA 5 3 n/a

You seeing the same stuff as us bud. I believe the quality is about 10 times better. You talk alot, but how true are you.



Umm im 100% true of my words, the qual is still overly too bright and the colors arent that good. It went through alot of filters as you can see, and if they were smart they would of cropped, sound still aint amazing..My ratings are perfectly fine, except for u dicksuckers that know shit.

__________________
RoLL That Shit
Smoke That Shit
Pass That Shit


Posted by sherl0k on 11-16-2002 09:27 PM:

pHo, thanks for clearing that up. a bunch of people on here THINK they know a lot, but really they're just talking out of their asses. if you don't know firsthand, don't say it. that's why most of this shit gets spread around.
as for the movie, i say 7/7/10. i couldn't tell if it was cropped or not, i really don't care, but it's WAY better than FTF's version. i think people are rating this much higher because they got so sick of the FTF rls. fine by me. eco deserves the scores.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:40 AM. Pages (5): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 »
Show all 87 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.