VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers *iNTERNAL* - CAM - TCF (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=12493)

if you made it less than 3 discs, it wouldn't be a compatible vcd, it would just be low res mpgs. Remember, the movie is quite long, thus it needs to be spread across 3 discs. just wait for the dvdscr (here's hoping!) it'll be 4 discs

quote:

---

Originally posted by KevN2002
But 3 cd's, ridiculous.

---

__________________

quote:

---

Originally posted by deftones6


How are you rating the video and audio without actually having the movie????

---

its actually 179 minutes long.. or 2 hours and 59 minutes

the best release so far. good job boys.
its a cam but its better than ftf bullshit ts

6/6/9

quote:

---

From NFO
source.......: cam (silver)

---

KevN2002 you schould be banned from vcdq for saying something THAT STUPID!. Prob. the worst comment ive ever seen in my life. stateing that 3 cds is ridiculus for this release. you obviouly havent been around long. Just go figure out the math and look the the label of the cds. what does it say? 80min? NO WAY! i guess that means on 2 cds they can only fit 1hour 40min tops on 2cds while still being able to see the picture. Less you release a proper and some how figure a way to encode it to 2 cds dont ever say something that stupid again.

__________________
How bout a choclate coverd pretzel

Fools are cool

This site rocks, I've been coming here for a few months now, I love reading everyones bullshit on here, people fighting over the stupidest things ever (Uti is better than ftf). lol. there all about the same, i watch ftf, uti, everyone i can get ahold of, exept for that newfxp i don't have to much faith in there first release. No i havn't seen the sample of the ftf, or the tcf version yet, so i am gonna judge the jpeg, looks like tcf did a better job, sound well I don't hear anything with a jpeg so the sound sucks. lol. at least my excuse is better than most for making a false judge, because i'm not making an excuse. to judge the video i save the jpeg and blow up one of the samples on the pic. and look at it on my tv, so there i have a sample. looks pretty damn good to me. lol. But i will say this in all honestly if you watch the bootleg before seeing TTT in the theatres your stupid, and your kids will be just as stupid as you. your momma is gonna be stupid if she lets you watch the bootleg first. Hell heres an idea read the book before watching the movie, that way you have an idea of how good the movie will be. yeah there you go. lol. Well i just wasted a min. or 2 of your time. so i'm outta here. hope you guys like my post. later all.

i saw this in theatre's twice, and to me the colors look wrong in it, just thought i'd mention that. (paticularily in gollum)

Pretty good for a cam, though... better than that FXP junk.

I saw it in the theaters, and a TS (or Cam) just doesn't do this movie justice.

PLEASE PLEASE see it in the theater first, it is MUCH better if you do.

I'm personally gonna wait for a dvdscreener, even though I already saw it in the theater

On why on the subject of CD, most dvd rips will end up in 4 cds, and I wouldn't be surprised if they get 5 cds, because of the demanding quality of the movie.

And finally, since I'm not gonna bother with getting a sample, x/x/10

Best rls out so far IMO. Picture is crisp cept a few minor probs and sound is good for a CAM, only a small hiss.

quote:

---

Originally posted by exorcist
i saw this in theatre's twice, and to me the colors look wrong in it, just thought i'd mention that. (paticularily in gollum)

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by oqwarrior
Hey, DIPSHIT, if you'll look in the NFO it says that they got this from a silver! Now who would have ever thought to look in the NFO? It clearly says, "source.......: cam (silver)"? WOW!!!!

What an asshole...

---

dunno why but sound is great for me in this one.. judging by sample but i'd give it an 8.. 7 for video if it wasnt all stretched, but a 6 cuz of that.. a bit blury but deffinately watchable

6/8/?(probably 10 )

cant reallycomplain about this..not bad on sound and pic........will surfice till a tele or a screener comes along ............probably tomorror

nice release. light years better than that shit from JewFXP and
clearer pic and sound than ftf.

6/6/6 cam of the beast

(im not that into lotr..but this is better than pt 1 so far)

merry xmas.

quote:

---

Originally posted by KevN2002
But 3 cd's, ridiculous.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Swimj
CAN I JUST STATE THIS, IF YOU ARENT BLIND THIS IS OBVIOUSLY FROM A DIFFERENT SOURCE THAN THE OTHER TWO TS, TCF WAS JUST BULLSHITTING CUZ THE USED A DIFFERENT SOURCE.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by your name here

i actually though some groups would make 4 cd versions

---

well anyways lets get u guys back on track, the rls is ok goes outs sync a bit on cd3 and the battle of helms deep is a lil dark but other than that its a passible rls for those of ya that cant hang on a lil longer, props to TCF for it, its supply n demand guys we know where ur coming from, go see this in the cinema tho Mr Jackson deserves props for this unlike the sellout Mr merchandise himself G lucas nuff said

cd3 has a lot of the pic cut off, and is missing footage