VCDQuality Forums Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]
Show all 51 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Ring - SCREENER - TCF (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=12626)


Posted by nvr on 12-25-2002 03:54 AM:

Awesome . 9/9/8. Only an 8 on the movie cause it wasnt gory enough in my opinion Silence Of The Lambs >Hannibal > Red Dragon but still worth watching.


Posted by Phantasmical on 12-25-2002 07:32 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Impaler
What group is The Ring in?



Huh?


Posted by Mak Man on 12-26-2002 11:35 PM:

The only problem with this release is the time index in the top corner and the "property of dreamworks studio" label in the middle of the entire movie. For many people those two faults in the movie can be annoying. Unfortunately I downloaded the movie before the jpg was put up on vcdquality. Other then that the release kicks @$$. The movie was really well done. It's based on a book by a chinese writer, I think. The book did really well too.

Hats off to TCF for another excellent release. This has to rank right up there with Red Dragon for scary movies this year.

Mak.


Posted by Ragin on 12-28-2002 07:19 AM:

I just wish they would have used the right TITLE for calling this release. NOT a Screener, but WORKPRINT. The time code is what a workprint has on it, and a screener only has property rights pop up from time to time. This is just a test release, and VHS at that from the tape balance at the begging that was adjusted. Good film but NOT for the arcives as the final, that's why they should use the damn right heading for what it is..sheeze!!!!!!!


Posted by pHo on 12-28-2002 07:29 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Ragin
The time code is what a workprint has on it, and a screener only has property rights pop up from time to


nope, im afraid you're wrong. a timecode is perfectly acceptable for a screener, along with property messages, b&w segments etc. in fact, every single screener tape i ever watched in the uk has been timecoded, its just down to the distributer what 'extras' a screener ships with. personally i dont mind timecodes cos i dont have a watch

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot


Posted by Vtec on 12-28-2002 09:56 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Ragin
I just wish they would have used the right TITLE for calling this release. NOT a Screener, but WORKPRINT. The time code is what a workprint has on it, and a screener only has property rights pop up from time to time. This is just a test release, and VHS at that from the tape balance at the begging that was adjusted. Good film but NOT for the arcives as the final, that's why they should use the damn right heading for what it is..sheeze!!!!!!!
Most of MGM's DVD SCREENERS have timecodes so are they dvd workprints? LOL, I've seen a countless amount of retail screeners bought from ebay (yes, the actual vhs retail screeners with cover and all) and some even have timecodes like Orange County. And as pHo said, 90% of uk screeners also have timecodes.


Posted by NeVeRLiFt on 12-28-2002 05:51 PM:

This is a pretty good release, being alittle dark and the fast motion scenes dont look good. The audio is ok for what it is.
This is missing scenes.
I would advise getting the UTi release if you can.


Posted by teen_wasteland on 12-29-2002 09:45 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by NeVeRLiFt
This is a pretty good release, being alittle dark and the fast motion scenes dont look good. The audio is ok for what it is.
This is missing scenes.
I would advise getting the UTi release if you can.



hmmm, my guess is he got the ring confused with lord of the rings. anyway kickass release from tcf as always. 8/9/8


Posted by Mystic Slippers on 12-29-2002 02:24 PM:

A good release. Nice, crisp picture and great audio. The 'Property Of...' that stays on for the entire movie is annoying as hell. But it doesn't bother me anyway as this movie is a FUCKING PILE OF SHIT!

7/7/3


Posted by nine-volt on 12-30-2002 04:05 AM:

pff

this movie sucked.
Video was ok, annoying Property of Dreamworks message and counter throughout. Audio was good. 7/7/2


Posted by Boywunda on 12-30-2002 11:57 PM:

Well I happen to be dling tcf's the ring at this present moment. I had a cam of it a month ago (cannot remember who made it) and was disappointed with the picture, but now I'm looking forward to this one. You can always trust tcf screeners!!


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:25 AM. Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]
Show all 51 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.