VCDQuality Forums Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »
Show all 64 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Dreamcatcher - TELESYNC - ESOTERiC (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=16257)


Posted by Lloyd_Banks on 03-12-2003 02:42 PM:

Good vid quality, sound wasn't great, but the movie was very watchable. Kind of confusing, but interesting. 8/6/8


Posted by Heflink on 03-13-2003 05:16 AM:

I dont know why anyone would give the sound on this a 7 or 8.. I'd say 6.

Video is good I'd give it a 7. As for the movie it looked to stupid to watch, I only wanted it for the Animatrix.

Esoteric still rules though, these guys have put out consistant Quality stuff since The Transporter...


Posted by morco on 03-13-2003 12:15 PM:

great pre nice video good soundd overall, very watchable!

7/6/7


Posted by mrtwist on 03-13-2003 02:49 PM:

6/5/7
Video was Dark and Pixeled
Audio was out of sync in parts and hollow sounding
Great movie.. its a very watchable release.. esp. for a pre


Posted by Foob on 03-13-2003 09:52 PM:

Angry Animatrix Final Flight of the Osiris Included?

I downloaded The Sample...Its okay

7/6/?

But IS THE FINAL FLIGHT TO OSIRIS INCLUDED W/THis RElease!?


Posted by lorddusty on 03-13-2003 11:16 PM:

Ok, watched the whole thing and the video was decent besides some flaws with pixelation. Sound was below average. And the movie was... just another Thing or It.. same craps been done before and then ending was just awful.

7/5/5


Posted by Heflink on 03-14-2003 01:25 AM:

No, the Animatrix isnt included.


Posted by Od|n on 03-14-2003 07:28 AM:

Good job esoteric looks good by the Jpeg so i'll score on that, but i'm going wait to see this in the theatre first. But props to a few week earlier release. 7/?/?


Posted by fuxake on 03-14-2003 03:53 PM:

Unhappy

Nice work on the release,,,but what a shite film, how can Morgan Freeman bear to be associated with schlock horror dross, damn shame...good work tho Esoteric, shame u didnt have any say in the film itself,,,lol


Posted by scousethief on 03-14-2003 05:47 PM:

Non compliant shouldve been nuked


Posted by Static on 03-15-2003 06:14 AM:

decent quality..but HOLY FUCK this movie is gay.
FUCKING Horrible.


Posted by rawgwar on 03-15-2003 06:57 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by Static
decent quality..but HOLY FUCK this movie is gay.
FUCKING Horrible.



Nice quality VIDEO but sounds is so so. just watched the movie and its pretty crappy story etc.

[7/5/5]

All the CRAP movies come out now "Willard" and such... Always got to wait for the Spring/Summer time flicks!!!

OT: interesting summer flcks
T3 "She'll be back" <----- that's gay + previews don't look so good
The Hulk, Xmen 2 etc


Posted by Bobby-Whiskey on 03-15-2003 11:43 PM:

Yes yes, okay picture quality with hollow sound. And christ did the movie ever disappoint. Read the novel instead, that way you won't have to put up with cheap looking cgi and an ending that fucking blows.


Posted by petrocs on 03-15-2003 11:46 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Od|n
Good job esoteric looks good by the Jpeg so i'll score on that, but i'm going wait to see this in the theatre first. But props to a few week earlier release. 7/?/?


DONT VOTE ON THE JPEG!

anyways..I finally got around to watching this. Sound isnt that great. A bit hollow and it appears the 2nd disc is out of sync. picture is pretty good..no complaints there

__________________
"If somebody said to me, in twelve years you’ll be in a band with your brother and two carrot munching geezers who don’t like football, I would've said 'fuck off, I’m not joining the Bee Gees." -Noel Gallagher 2005


Posted by flashman on 03-16-2003 03:30 AM:

Talking

Another fine pre-release by esoteric.video is clear ,audio a little hollow/scratchy,but considering this dont hit for a few weeks,we cant complain here,good job guys!7.5/6/8


Posted by Zenman on 03-17-2003 09:36 PM:

Just watched last night. I feel the pic was great and the sound was good nuff for me. Props to ESOTERiC on a quality release. I agree with the WTF ending but we have Stephen King to blame for that.

8/6.5/7


Posted by hizb0la on 03-17-2003 09:43 PM:

WTF

Ok Maybe I just happend to skip thru the wrong parts. But after burning and testing this flick. I didn't see ANY kids, or Any part of the sample.. WtF .. Is this sample clip actually in the movie, are these kids in this movie. (look at the SS at Vcdqual) this scene is not in my copy.

Did I just skip the wrong parts, or did I not even get this flick .. (in the begining it says all the cast that it says here, so Im sure I did).

Lemme know.. and yes Im probally retarded for asking but oh well. Gotta ask..

Thanx

From what I saw the quality was decent, kinda bright. Sound was annoying.. 6/6/?


Posted by Zenman on 03-18-2003 01:31 AM:

Re: WTF

Those are from the flash backs of when they met him and when they found that girl


quote:
Originally posted by hizb0la
Ok Maybe I just happend to skip thru the wrong parts. But after burning and testing this flick. I didn't see ANY kids, or Any part of the sample.. WtF .. Is this sample clip actually in the movie, are these kids in this movie. (look at the SS at Vcdqual) this scene is not in my copy.

Did I just skip the wrong parts, or did I not even get this flick .. (in the begining it says all the cast that it says here, so Im sure I did).

Lemme know.. and yes Im probally retarded for asking but oh well. Gotta ask..

Thanx

From what I saw the quality was decent, kinda bright. Sound was annoying.. 6/6/?


Posted by QwErTsTeR on 03-28-2003 03:21 AM:

Video is not bad, a bit of pixelation and glitches here and there but no real biggie. Audio on the other hand is horrible, all semi-high pitched and loud noises are heavily distorted, almost like this movie is from the 1930's. Movie itself is not bad, I probably would have enjoyed it more if the sound was better. It was impossible to understand some of the things people were saying due to the heavy distortion so I got a bit lost in the story at some points.

I give this release 6/2/7


Posted by K2K2 on 03-28-2003 10:24 PM:

this rls is better then the SVCD's that were rlsd, why waste the bandwidth on them for a 2% increase in quality.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:25 AM. Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »
Show all 64 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.