![]() |
Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 » Show all 64 posts from this thread on one page |
VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Dreamcatcher - TELESYNC - ESOTERiC (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=16257)
Good vid quality, sound wasn't great, but the movie was very watchable. Kind of confusing, but interesting. 8/6/8
I dont know why anyone would give the sound on this a 7 or 8.. I'd say 6.
Video is good I'd give it a 7. As for the movie it looked to stupid to watch, I only wanted it for the Animatrix.
Esoteric still rules though, these guys have put out consistant Quality stuff since The Transporter...
great pre nice video good soundd overall, very watchable!
7/6/7
6/5/7
Video was Dark and Pixeled
Audio was out of sync in parts and hollow sounding
Great movie.. its a very watchable release.. esp. for a pre
Animatrix Final Flight of the Osiris Included?
I downloaded The Sample...Its okay
7/6/?
But IS THE FINAL FLIGHT TO OSIRIS INCLUDED W/THis RElease!?
Ok, watched the whole thing and the video was decent besides some flaws with pixelation. Sound was below average. And the movie was... just another Thing or It.. same craps been done before and then ending was just awful.
7/5/5
No, the Animatrix isnt included.
Good job esoteric looks good by the Jpeg so i'll score on that, but i'm going wait to see this in the theatre first. But props to a few week earlier release. 7/?/?
Nice work on the release,,,but what a shite film, how can Morgan Freeman bear to be associated with schlock horror dross, damn shame...good work tho Esoteric, shame u didnt have any say in the film itself,,,lol
Non compliant shouldve been nuked
decent quality..but HOLY FUCK this movie is gay.
FUCKING Horrible.
quote:
Originally posted by Static
decent quality..but HOLY FUCK this movie is gay.
FUCKING Horrible.
Yes yes, okay picture quality with hollow sound. And christ did the movie ever disappoint. Read the novel instead, that way you won't have to put up with cheap looking cgi and an ending that fucking blows.
quote:
Originally posted by Od|n
Good job esoteric looks good by the Jpeg so i'll score on that, but i'm going wait to see this in the theatre first. But props to a few week earlier release. 7/?/?
__________________
"If somebody said to me, in twelve years you’ll be in a band with your brother and two carrot munching geezers who don’t like football, I would've said 'fuck off, I’m not joining the Bee Gees." -Noel Gallagher 2005
Another fine pre-release by esoteric.video is clear ,audio a little hollow/scratchy,but considering this dont hit for a few weeks,we cant complain here,good job guys!7.5/6/8
Just watched last night. I feel the pic was great and the sound was good nuff for me. Props to ESOTERiC on a quality release. I agree with the WTF ending but we have Stephen King to blame for that.
8/6.5/7
WTF
Ok Maybe I just happend to skip thru the wrong parts. But after burning and testing this flick. I didn't see ANY kids, or Any part of the sample.. WtF .. Is this sample clip actually in the movie, are these kids in this movie. (look at the SS at Vcdqual) this scene is not in my copy.
Did I just skip the wrong parts, or did I not even get this flick .. (in the begining it says all the cast that it says here, so Im sure I did).
Lemme know.. and yes Im probally retarded for asking but oh well. Gotta ask..
Thanx
From what I saw the quality was decent, kinda bright. Sound was annoying.. 6/6/?
Re: WTF
Those are from the flash backs of when they met him and when they found that girl
quote:
Originally posted by hizb0la
Ok Maybe I just happend to skip thru the wrong parts. But after burning and testing this flick. I didn't see ANY kids, or Any part of the sample.. WtF .. Is this sample clip actually in the movie, are these kids in this movie. (look at the SS at Vcdqual) this scene is not in my copy.
Did I just skip the wrong parts, or did I not even get this flick .. (in the begining it says all the cast that it says here, so Im sure I did).
Lemme know.. and yes Im probally retarded for asking but oh well. Gotta ask..
Thanx
From what I saw the quality was decent, kinda bright. Sound was annoying.. 6/6/?
Video is not bad, a bit of pixelation and glitches here and there but no real biggie. Audio on the other hand is horrible, all semi-high pitched and loud noises are heavily distorted, almost like this movie is from the 1930's. Movie itself is not bad, I probably would have enjoyed it more if the sound was better. It was impossible to understand some of the things people were saying due to the heavy distortion so I got a bit lost in the story at some points.
I give this release 6/2/7
this rls is better then the SVCD's that were rlsd, why waste the bandwidth on them for a 2% increase in quality.
| All times are GMT. The time now is 07:25 AM. | Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 » Show all 64 posts from this thread on one page |
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.