VCDQuality Forums - The Core *SVCD* - TELESYNC

Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »
Show all 63 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://forum.vcdq.com/index.php)
- VCD (http://forum.vcdq.com/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Core *SVCD* - TELESYNC - Centropy (http://forum.vcdq.com/showthread.php?threadid=17109)

Posted by petrocs on 03-31-2003 02:43 AM:

are we sure this is the whole movie? the movie is supposedly 136 min so I am curious how this fit onto 2 discs being an SVCD..seeing is how David Gale was 130 min and was on 3 cd's

__________________
"If somebody said to me, in twelve years you’ll be in a band with your brother and two carrot munching geezers who don’t like football, I would've said 'fuck off, I’m not joining the Bee Gees." -Noel Gallagher 2005

Posted by petrocs on 03-31-2003 04:16 AM:

well..as far as I can see the whole thing is there..I am curious though SVCD has the capacity to hold about 35-60 minutes on 74/80 min CDs and the 2nd disc of the Core was 66+ minutes..hmmm anyone wanna chime in on this one?

Posted by YourW0RLDisMINE on 03-31-2003 07:01 AM:

Ummm...does anyone who has acutally seen this movie confirm that the second disc of this SVCD is flawed? The beginning of the second disc starts with the Paramount intro then cuts back to the scene, then cuts to the Core title screen, then back to the movie. It's a simple fix i know but any idea how this could have occured? Other than that, the angle isn't a problem (you'd get the same perspective if you don't get that dead center seat or got to the movie late and had to sit in the front row anyways). Excellent release CTP and keep kicking ass!

8.5/9/7

POKE SMOT

Posted by danl on 03-31-2003 03:06 PM:

YourW0RLDisMINE,
thats your typical win xp caching problem with power dvd.
It happens when you play parts of cd1, then put in cd2 (with the same label). Windows plays the movie from the cache, so you see parts of cd1. I've watched the whole thing. No problems with either cds.

Posted by misfits138 on 03-31-2003 05:09 PM:

video: good color but a hint of fish-eye lens. 7.8
sound: very nice for ts. 8.5

Posted by olympiakos on 04-01-2003 09:11 AM:

im downloading it now..
saw the sample..looks good
i always liked most of centropy's releases

Posted by Yomper on 04-01-2003 01:10 PM:

I just watched this and i have no complaints, sound was good and so was the quality of the picture, so centropy come up trumps again IMO

Posted by Wishkmaster on 04-01-2003 02:52 PM:

Nice Release,
just watched the sample
7/8/7

Posted by necrosilva on 04-01-2003 04:37 PM:

the quality looks good. i mean come on. for somtething that barely came out Friday

Posted by lo.pro on 04-01-2003 08:59 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by rappa

You do know there are cams you can adjust the shutter rate to be the same as the projection which means that its not PAL or NTSC so they can rls in either format without any flicker. On the quality. 8/9/8...i enjoyed the movie alot, kept me well entertained and its not as far fetched as u think..overall the angle doesn't affect the picture, ill take angle over blue tint.

there is exactly one camera in the 'prosumer' range which can shoot at Film frame rate atm. if that is what's being used, then i'm a bit disappointed at the quality, i'd have thought that one (or, of course, any of the full pro models) would give bettter quality. also, it makes no sense to me that if they were using that one, that they'd not be shooting progressive frames.

ah, well, doesn't matter anyway, i guess

__________________

This perceived misuse of Internet resources caused former Dutch education minister Loek Hermans to comment: "It would be nice if the students at Twente University would use their fast connections for information and education purposes, instead of downloading huge amounts of porn."

____________________________________ knowing is the easy part _____________

.

Posted by memoman on 04-02-2003 02:28 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by petrocs
well..as far as I can see the whole thing is there..I am curious though SVCD has the capacity to hold about 35-60 minutes on 74/80 min CDs and the 2nd disc of the Core was 66+ minutes..hmmm anyone wanna chime in on this one?

can't they stretch the capacity by lowering the bitrate

Posted by petrocs on 04-02-2003 02:46 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by memoman

can't they stretch the capacity by lowering the bitrate

yes you are right..I'm just curious as to why they did that with this and not other releases..David Gale did NOT need 3 cd's for instance so it got me thinking

Posted by BONE on 04-02-2003 11:54 PM:

the "boom" mike problem wasn't from Centropy, it was the unedited or pre-mastered released screenings. Alot of these pre-mastered showings include scenes with boom mikes hanging in the actors faces. I went to see a pre-release of The Ring and sure enough there were mikes hanging and lowered at inapropriate times, just not fully edited from the frame.

I know The Core didn't have this issue, but the weird "Leno" angle was kinda odd. fantastic sound and about the best you can get with the picture quality (for a TS)

8/9/4

Posted by lorddusty on 04-03-2003 05:24 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by lo.pro
there is exactly one camera in the 'prosumer' range which can shoot at Film frame rate atm. if that is what's being used, then i'm a bit disappointed at the quality, i'd have thought that one (or, of course, any of the full pro models) would give bettter quality. also, it makes no sense to me that if they were using that one, that they'd not be shooting progressive frames.

ah, well, doesn't matter anyway, i guess

Which consumer camera caps 24 fps progressive? I didn't know they'd released one yet.

Posted by B16A2 on 04-03-2003 06:04 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by lorddusty

Which consumer camera caps 24 fps progressive? I didn't know they'd released one yet.

Some jvc's, check em out. There are even some other cams which you can adjust to cap ntsc film, but I dont know if they are progressive. Where have you been

Posted by frak on 04-03-2003 10:09 AM:

Just finished watching it....

Video: 6
Audio: 9
Movie: 6

The video was good quality.. but the Angle killed it for me, just was annoying to watch.

WTF is with CTP and all these fubar angles/lenses.

Posted by hippyhater on 04-04-2003 03:26 AM:

video 9: GREAT COLOURS!! barely noticed the angle most of the time but sometimes it was really showing (rarely)
audio 9: great sound, no buzz or anything no complaints at all

movie was entertaining, but nothing id see again for another 5-10 years

9/9/5

Posted by mceckounltd on 04-05-2003 08:30 PM:

heres what i think

Video: The angle when the movie starts at the paramount thing isnt tha greatest. Its like they taped it from a corner. One thing I have to say is the motion blur is bad. When the movie starts and the camera goes after it says The Core u can see small blocks.

Audio: Same audio as all CTP releases perfect.

Movie: havent seen it

Posted by Yomper on 04-06-2003 01:11 AM:

I agree there, motion blur was a bit of a problem, but i still found it a very watchable telesync with good sound. i don't mind a little bit of flickering in certain scenes as this release is quite early i thought and still good.
not so sure why the fuss on the angle as i didnt notice it a great deal.

Posted by 28_days_later on 04-20-2003 07:32 PM:

well it was overall a good rls except the aspect ratio was fucked when you would see the character's faces up close. their chins were HUGE!!! lol its a good rls though, good movie

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:50 AM.

Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »
Show all 63 posts from this thread on one page