VCDQuality Forums - Murder By Numbers - TELESYNC

Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]
Show all 57 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Murder By Numbers - TELESYNC - Centropy (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=2421)

Posted by M_J on 04-24-2002 07:26 AM:

take notes ftf , take notes.

Posted by plonk420 on 04-24-2002 10:36 AM:

Re: Re: Re: arg

quote:
Originally posted by napalmfuzz
second of all my 2 dvd players were about 400 each.. a phillips magnovox and a zenith progressive scan.. so you can eat my cock K-mart boy

eewwwwww. hate both/all (3?) companies...

my philips 2x2x8 CDRW fuckin' broke in less than a year; the p/m $150-200 boombox makes thup-thup-thupping noises when played at even low volumes, and, well, zenith. >GAG< >CHOKE< worst TVs, no, make that electronics, on earth...

i'd take my "$80 power buttonless" player (region changable, MV free and all) over even a Toshiba/Sony/Pioneer/etc...

however, opinion MIGHT change after (when and if) i get a Flat Screen/HD Flat Screen... tho i hear WEGAs (and ASSumably others as well) have something to resize Anamorphic WS images, making getting an expensive DVD player for WS conversion a moot point...

and yeah, non-VCD compliance and desynching is a PITA, but then again, i can play plain MPEGs sitting in the root directory just peachy keen. something i can't do on any "expensive" DVD players i've come across...

----
edit
----

hooleeeeee shit!!!

actually hunted down the sample (for once)! have ANY TSes been this good??? i'm tempted to even try to grab all the RARs. well. was tempted. like for five seconds. a little flickery (fades in and out) but the BEST DAMN TS i've EVER fuckin' seen!!!

Posted by sNiPeR on 04-24-2002 10:45 AM:

The picture looks way better then the sample .

Posted by dumwaldo on 04-24-2002 04:26 PM:

Centropy releases are 100% compliant PAL VCD's. if you have any problems playing their releases the problem is ENTIRLEY within your DVD player and the inability to decode PAL properly.

every centropy release i have, including this one, follows this exact standard...
Video:
1150 kbit/sec MPEG-1
352 x 288 pixels
25 frames/second

Audio:
224 kbit/sec MPEG-1 Layer2
now if you dont believe me feel free to open the dat file in windows media player and check the file properties to verify this but i assure you ALL CENTROPY RELEASES ARE FULLY VCD COMPLIANT. i cant say the same for every DVD player.

now on to the next point... the name of this site is VCDQuality not sampleQuality so please don't comment untill you have seen the VCD not just the sample that the group undoubtedly took from the very best part of the movie.

as far as the VCD goes... this is a fairly good release. it is just a little to dark in dark areas and the whites are either tinted blue or so washed out they have no detail. if you are used to watching TS's then you will have no complaints with this one but if you are expecting screener quality then wait for a screener.

the audio is top notch in this one... no buzzing or noise like the scorpion king.

again this is a PAL release so my apex does have some problems where it goes in and out of sync, thats the apex not the VCD because it plays on my computer flawlessly.

__________________
what the hell do i know, i watch my movies on a 2.2" screen.

"pho est wonderful!" "pho est wonderful!" really, he is

Posted by typhoon on 04-24-2002 04:41 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Natural

rofl. damn. send me your version of kazaa please, so hopefully i can get this shit a little faster

wtf? u use kazaa... lol.. are u serious or just a n00b?

Posted by Sig-Bro on 04-24-2002 06:04 PM:

Corrupt

Ok, Normally I wouldn't post anything like this on the forum, but has anyone else had a problem with rar 16 for CD 2 of MBN??? I figured it was just a corrput file from where I got it from, so I downloaded it from another site, and it also was corrupt. If anyone else has had the same problem, please let me know.

Posted by m-drew on 04-25-2002 01:34 AM:

Re: Re: Re: arg

quote:
Originally posted by napalmfuzz

first of all buddy... dont message me about your peice of shit walmart dvd player you got with no power button for 80 bucks.. second of all my 2 dvd players were about 400 each.. a phillips magnovox and a zenith progressive scan.. so you can eat my cock K-mart boy
im just tired of all you little lamer motherfuckers kissing ctp's ass. yeah they have good quality rls's. BUT... there is a legion of people that cannot play theyre releases. and if its not playable on a standalone it defeats the point of a vcd and they might as fucking well just become a god damn divx rls group

Magnavox & Zenith!

WOW!

Posted by ArchdemoN on 04-25-2002 02:13 AM:

yes the buzzing is their fault, u have to admit...

still haven't fixed that, and the odd bluish tint now and then...
i reckon those "bad" copies come from the same source.

Posted by moviebootlegger on 04-25-2002 02:23 AM:

aye a friend of mine go spiderman already but only cd2 :-(

Posted by plonk420 on 04-25-2002 09:00 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by dumwaldo
every centropy release i have, including this one, follows this exact standard...
Video:
1150 kbit/sec MPEG-1

hmmm.. well sheeeit. who is it that does those bizzare video bitrate VCDs then?

**edit #2

i thought it was CTP, too, but the br on MBR is 1150kbs...

small question, tho... isn't the *official* bitrate 1148, not 1150?

as for desynching, i guess i'll find out soon... downloading the movie right now...

**edit #3

it WAS CTP... Blade 2 had the fuxored up bitrate. the intro was normal, but the movie was that 1200-something shit...

Posted by nova64 on 04-25-2002 12:41 PM:

For fucks sake, I can't believe some of you people. I've been coming to vcdquaitly for ages and only just started to post. What pisses me off and from what I've read, alot of other people, are the complaining bitchs and idiots out there, who go on and on about little things. The simple thing that NEEDS to be made clear here is, THESE ARE FUCKING FREE MOVIES, you morons, and the fact you can watch them at home as well, a bonus, what do you want ? dolby 5.1 ?.
This release just happens to be one of the best releases centropy have done, period and others agree with me. Quailty on video is tops. If so many of you complaining gits are that know it all about such things as audio and picture, fuck of to the cinema yourself, get a camera, and do a release. Until then, why not just enjoy the stuff you get FOR FREE!!!

Also, this aint no revalation, I aint trying to turn loads of you around, I'm stating facts here people, there are to many people who complain about some fucking stupid things, hell, this stuff is totally dodgey anyways, yet they expect the earth with video and audio, encoding etc.. get real.

Anyway, thats this years rant from me.

Centropy, well done for a top release good stuff

Hello to other top people as well

Posted by dumwaldo on 04-25-2002 01:27 PM:

Re: Corrupt

quote:
Originally posted by Sig-Bro
Ok, Normally I wouldn't post anything like this on the forum, but has anyone else had a problem with rar 16 for CD 2 of MBN??? I figured it was just a corrput file from where I got it from, so I downloaded it from another site, and it also was corrupt. If anyone else has had the same problem, please let me know.

no i didn't have any problems with any corrupt rars. maybe one day the scene will realize their transportation method is not perfect and adopt the use of par files. the scene generally lags behind usenet as far as technology goes anyway so im sure they will start using pars eventually.

quote:
Originally posted by ArchdemoN
yes the buzzing is their fault, u have to admit...

still haven't fixed that, and the odd bluish tint now and then...
i reckon those "bad" copies come from the same source.

yes the buzzing is their fault but de-syncing is not. again this release does NOT have buzzing so at least as far as this release is concerned the did fix that.

quote:
Originally posted by plonk420
it WAS CTP... Blade 2 had the fuxored up bitrate. the intro was normal, but the movie was that 1200-something shit...

i stand corrected. the bitrate in blade 2 is 1246000 and not 1150000 so it is an XVCD. this release however, as backed up by plonk420, is the proper bitrate and fully compliant. i was wrong to say every release is compliant when i didnt check every release. i was wrong on saying every release is compliant. i got plonked and i deserved it.

__________________
what the hell do i know, i watch my movies on a 2.2" screen.

"pho est wonderful!" "pho est wonderful!" really, he is

Posted by plonk420 on 04-25-2002 08:51 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by nova64
For fucks sake, I can't believe some of you people. I've been coming to vcdquaitly for ages and only just started to post. What pisses me off and from what I've read, alot of other people, are the complaining bitchs and idiots out there, who go on and on about little things. The simple thing that NEEDS to be made clear here is, THESE ARE FUCKING FREE MOVIES, you morons, and the fact you can watch them at home as well, a bonus

ehh, this website is VCDQUALITY, right? i AM in the right place,

aren't i? so at least some of the discussion here would be to bitch out sloppy releases. this isn't one, IMO.

quote:
what do you want ? dolby 5.1 ?.

that'd be hard to do. theater sound isn't STANDARD DD, let alone a bitrate i can stand at all. i'd prefer Dolby SR (analog) over Theater Dolby Digital. and that's saying something...

quote:
This release just happens to be one of the best releases centropy have done, period and others agree with me. Quailty on video is tops. If so many of you complaining gits are that know it all about such things as audio and picture, fuck of to the cinema yourself, get a camera, and do a release. Until then, why not just enjoy the stuff you get FOR FREE!!!

heh .. i get it for free, anyways... w00t! well, except for smaller releases like Kissing Jessica Stein (or whatever) or Monsters Ball (which no one i know seemed to like...)

the audio was good enough for me, as far as i can tell. still need to take it over to the standalone, tho... (i'd prefer to wait to finish downloading it rather than knock a rewrite of a CDRW by burning just the sample...)

quote:
Centropy, well done for a top release good stuff

agreed. very much so.

Posted by pHo on 04-25-2002 10:21 PM:

CURSE YOU DUMWALDO !
was just gonna flame you for being wrong about the xvcd thing

yeah, both Res Evil and Blade 2 (for sure) and probably others were XVCD hence why they lag on players. I'd be interested to know how CTP master their VCD images, cos if its not the fact they were xvcd bitrates (the main bitch i had was they lowered the sound bitrate down to 128kbit.. NOOO! horrible horrible horrible) cos they gotta be doing SOMETHING weird.

anyway curse you, wanted to prove u wrong but u noticed. damn

and people PLEASE learn some things ::

1.just because your DVD player plays it doesn't make it compliant
2.if someone can't play a release do NOT presume its their "cheapy" player. I bet you're $500 players can't play 5500kbit miniDVD formats? well my $99 player can.
3.any more of this 128kbit audio malarky and i'll cut the dogs bollocks off. ok !

__________________
563-773-1880

<Dwaggy> i caught you a delicious Bass
<The404> This is because you are an idiot

Posted by rotorman67 on 04-26-2002 03:31 AM:

The ctp releases Count of Monte Cristo and We Were Soldiers were also 1246 Mbits video. My beef is there is something wrong with the aspect ratio on some of ctp's releases. Collateral Damage and the Count of Monte Cristo both had messed up aspect ratios. Wish ctp would get their act together and release quality like they used to.

Posted by plonk420 on 05-02-2002 08:24 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by rotorman67
The ctp releases Count of Monte Cristo and We Were Soldiers were also 1246 Mbits video. My beef is there is something wrong with the aspect ratio on some of ctp's releases. Collateral Damage and the Count of Monte Cristo both had messed up aspect ratios. Wish ctp would get their act together and release quality like they used to.

and changing lanes... =b which wasn't such a good movie, anywho (preview was damn good tho... hehe)

i've asked before, but WHY? why do these groups release these messed up AR TSes and such? so that there's more picture? do a damn SVCD if you want more "picture"...

---oh, and forgot to add... MBN is a'ight. best damn TS i've seen. but still not THAT hot. can't wait for Life... to exit the queue(s) and friggin' download, already...

Posted by X-MAN on 05-10-2002 12:33 AM:

great quality!!!!!
cTP rulez the movie scene...

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:28 PM.

Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]
Show all 57 posts from this thread on one page