VCDQuality Forums - Unfaithful - TELESYNC

Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]
Show all 59 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Unfaithful - TELESYNC - Centropy (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=2897)

Posted by ww-Boot on 05-17-2002 01:23 AM:

Jesus, allot of you bitch ! ! !
ctp rules
Great Work!!!

Posted by afr0thund3r on 05-17-2002 02:03 AM:

bottom line is that the svcds are definitely superior to the vcds. but 3 cds for a ts can be excessive. for a major release such as spiderman, i am sure that most people wouldn't mind burning an extra cd. if the release can fit on 2 cds, then i'm all for the svcd. but for any old movie, i would prefer not to use 2 gigs of hd space.

Posted by napalmfuzz on 05-17-2002 04:22 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by hpv

Actually I could care less about whether it's VCD or SVCD. But your zenith dvd player is a piece of shit if it can't play the Spiderman SVCD. And as you've already made abundantly clear, you have no where near the required knowledge to make a statement on quality. And btw, I never said anything about an SVCD making a TS better than an VCD. You're the moron who implied that.

just give up man.. give up... ill sum up my argument in 2 words
Junior Member
maybe you werent ready to be winged from kazaa yet

__________________

"Nothing says OBEY ME like a severed head on a fence post,"

Posted by hpv on 05-17-2002 06:27 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by napalmfuzz

just give up man.. give up... ill sum up my argument in 2 words
Junior Member
maybe you werent ready to be winged from kazaa yet

Or that could be because I don't post here 24/7 because I'm not a moron with no life that sits around posting shit on this forum?

Fact is, I know what the fuck I'm talking about and you know about posting bullshit on this forum and sucking your dad's cock, and not much else. But stop your whining because you spent the 400$ your dad gave you for giving him head on a piece of shit zenith because you thought progressive scan would do anything on your crappy television and now you're sad because dad wants freebies and you didn't have the sense to know the capabilities and limitations of your player before you bought it.

Posted by krazyfoo on 05-17-2002 02:01 PM:

oh i see.. we're basing knowledge on post count?... cuz i always thought the guy w/ all the posts.. was the guy w/ too much time on his hands.. and nothing else.

as for this svcd argument.. i think it should be worked out like this:
SVCD TELESYNCS should be standard.. as long as it doesnt take 3 CDs[or 113+ minutes].. if so u go w/ VCD and leave it at 2 CDs.. cuz i dont care enough to burn 3 cds.. of some TS thta WILL have a screener later on.

3cd rls's and up... should only be allowed w/ digital sources..

Posted by Bud-man on 05-18-2002 03:45 PM:

There is NO reason why these movies are released as a SVCD...there origin is from a vcd so stretching it out to 480x480 really makes no sense, look at spiderman there faces looked fat and dunst legs looked real fat in that waitress dress....waste of time having to dload another cd, and dont give me crap about encoding ive been ripping shit when most of u were still in diapers...which isnt more than 10 yrs ago

Posted by Taxman on 05-18-2002 05:25 PM:

omg

Im fucking sick of reading this god damn forum. All I hear is bitching and fucking VCD is better than SVCD. Jesus A Christ. No should care so fucking much over something so gay.

If your going to post something, make it a review. And whoever is moderating this forum should post a rule about no gay buttsex flamming about video format. No one wants to read it. Whenever a movie comes out. Someone has to make the same stupid arguement about VCD or SVCD. God im sick of this n00b shit.

Posted by krazyfoo on 05-18-2002 06:34 PM:

way to be stupid.

quote:
originally posted by Bud-Man
there origin is from a vcd so stretching it out to 480x480 really makes no sense

yes .. u have OBVIOUSLY been encoding since i was in diapers.. funny how the 'origin' was a DV cam.. and from there.. it was encoded to SVCD/mpg2... no VCD/mpg1 involved.
hail oh wise encoder.. stfu.

Posted by hpv on 05-18-2002 11:09 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by Bud-man
There is NO reason why these movies are released as a SVCD...there origin is from a vcd so stretching it out to 480x480 really makes no sense, look at spiderman there faces looked fat and dunst legs looked real fat in that waitress dress....waste of time having to dload another cd, and dont give me crap about encoding ive been ripping shit when most of u were still in diapers...which isnt more than 10 yrs ago

Ok, first thing first, kid. Spider-Man was a fucking PAL SVCD. It is 480x576.

Second, that's why it looked squished, because your DVD player is a piece of shit and is too cheap to handle it properly.

Now, third, since you've been encoding for so long, then you would know that SVCD doesn't used square pixels, so even if the image is 480x480 (which it isn't as I stated in part 1), then it would appear 4:3 when played back.

Fourth, you've obviously never encoded anything in your life (with the possible, but unlikely seeing as how stupid you are, exception of an automatic DVD->RealMedia converter as you're far too gay for anything of higher quality.)

Fifth, you're a fucking moron. Sit down and shut the fuck up before you hurt yourself.

That's all. Stupid people, at least try to learn something to sound smart before you post on here. And making claims and then backing them up with a startling level of ignorance is NOT how to do it.

And on a side note, Krazyfoo has good thoughts on disc # and stuff, but the kids can release however they want. We're getting it for free and it's plenty watchable.

Posted by Trickster on 05-19-2002 09:50 AM:

Long time reader, first time poster.

Guys sitting here and talking about someones sexuality is not posting a review about the movie. Take a look at the forums of isonews and see what happens when thats how people talk. Lets sit here and talk about the movie (of which there is probably 5 reviews out of 50 posts). Thanks for your time

Posted by krazyfoo on 05-20-2002 01:12 AM:

Trickster.. i agree.. the movie should be talked about..

but .. u DO realize u did the same thign?.. u didnt mention the movie quality either.. that and.. i dont think there is gonna be much more discussion involved w/ these svcd ts's.. since they will most likely always be of an acceptable quality to those who swing the way of the ts :P

and.. please dont compare this to iSONEWS.. the quality of flame here.. is much higher heh.. but yea.. im done.

Posted by Spree on 05-20-2002 03:41 AM:

What is the deal with the mikes in this? Where did they get this copy from? I saw it in the theater an i'm sure i would have seen the mike one of the 12 times that are in this release.

No bitching i think it's funny like that.

Posted by aZoR on 05-20-2002 06:49 AM:

Un Edited???

Has anyone else noticed that this film is unedited(noted because the mic booms are still in the movie)...meaning the CTP is getting it directly from source...Interesting

Good job CTP!

Posted by Greeneyes on 05-20-2002 09:35 PM:

Love those SVCD

I don't understand why all the complaints. Since Centropy has
been releasing the TS in this format the quality is much better.
I really appreciate the difference in quality. I don't care about
the extra cd(cost about 10cents a disc). Now I can enjoy the
movie at home. I think this format makes them very watchable.
I hate that FTF shit! When I see that group associated with a
release I don't even bother to download it. Waste of time and
a disc. I'm off to the theater to watch "Enough" because I've
had enough of FTF's Shit!

Posted by luckifer on 05-20-2002 10:26 PM:

booms and their mic's

I just wanted to mention something about the microphones in the movies.

A couple years ago I was able to enjoy the only NC-17 version of Jerry Maguire...the reason was because the projector that was used to view it was old school and the filters(to crop the picture, can't remember the actual term) had to be set manually. The projectionist failed to put the proper filter on, so instead of having Cuba Gooding Jr.'s penis cropped out of a shot in the lockerroom, it was there in plain view. The same goes for microphones...

For some reason CTP does not have access to a properly cropped projector, or something to that effect...I have no idea.

So, the copy of Unfaithful they had was most likely no different than the one's released to theater after theater, other than the projector wasn't setup properly.

I am surprised this information isn't more commonly known. The film reel shows more than is actually presented on the screen...I believe pretty much any movie has the boom and all visible, just that they are cropped out by the projector.

Posted by krazyfoo on 05-21-2002 04:33 AM:

yep.. id bet ur on the mark for sure luckifer

but some movies dont work that way.. this one however probably does.. years ago i used to run projectors for a local theatre [99cent.. theatre w00t].. and they had some of the same problems.. but i have never gone to a real theatre and seen this.. so im wonderin how they managed to find such a poorly setup reel :P..

funny storry about Jerry Maguire by the way

oh and greeneyes.. not to flame.. but u DID manage to contradict urself :P

quote:
Orginally posted by Greeneyes:

I don't care about
the extra cd(cost about 10cents a disc)........
I hate that FTF shit! .....Waste of time and
a disc.

guess SOME discs matter and some dont right ;-P?

Posted by DVD STALKER on 06-01-2002 09:19 PM:

GOD DAMN SHES HOT

[edit] NO REQUESTING[/edit] -cx

Posted by ww-Boot on 06-02-2002 07:17 AM:

Looking for the movie for a week and half

Your comming on the forum and asking for a movie !
WHY ?

Posted by Movies'R'us on 06-03-2002 10:12 AM:

Boom Mic

I watched the centropy released of Unfaithful and I enjoyed the movie but the one thing that just racked my nerves what the boom mic showing in like 90% of the movie...... is this a workprint release or something? If this is a telesync shot from a theatre I can pretty much bet people were exceptionally ticked off if they noticed it.

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:58 PM.

Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]
Show all 59 posts from this thread on one page