VCDQuality Forums Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »
Show all 61 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- Undercover Brother - TELESYNC - FTF (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=3327)


Posted by doobie on 06-04-2002 05:57 PM:

Nomatter what all the FTF haters say, this release is watchable. Lets keep in mind it's a fucking Telesync not a damn DVDRip. And you can't keep comparing FTF to CTP like people do, how stupid is that? Comparing the best in the biz to the worst in the biz?? Why can't you just let FTF release what you call, "Crap"? Who cares? People act like somone's forcing them to watch FTF releases and it being real painful or something. Anyway, I'm sure FTF doesn't like all the hating on 'em either, probably hurts their feelings, and that's NOT what we need. What they need is more positive reinforcment for every move they make towards a better release, and a lot less negative reinforcment for the not perfect releases, just ignore 'em or give a review...don't bash...


-Doobie
PS. Hopefully my last non-review post


Posted by dedHED on 06-04-2002 06:12 PM:

Angry oh! whoopsie

quote:
well that sux! guess i shoulda read rools first!
[B][I][U][SIZE=3][FONT=century gothic][COLOR=red]


Posted by dedHED on 06-04-2002 11:56 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by doobie
Nomatter what all the FTF haters say, this release is watchable {NOT}. Lets keep in mind it's a fucking Telesync not a damn DVDRip. And you can't keep comparing FTF to CTP like people do, how stupid is that? Comparing the best in the biz to the worst in the biz?? Why can't you just let FTF release what you call, "Crap"? Who cares? People act like somone's forcing them to watch FTF releases and it being real painful or something. Anyway, I'm sure FTF doesn't like all the hating on 'em either, probably hurts their feelings, and that's NOT what we need. What they need is more positive reinforcment for every move they make towards a better release, and a lot less negative reinforcment for the not perfect releases, just ignore 'em or give a review...don't bash...


-Doobie
PS. Hopefully my last non-review post



well when they jump on a movie and release it with thier typical crap quality... alot of times other real groups that CARE about quality wont release it because its already been done (sometimes big movies are re-released but in general not) and that what makes it suck! :-)


Posted by renegade on 06-05-2002 12:05 AM:

This release was decent. Okay picture but the audio was pure shit. Had that hollow sound of a cam and the fuzzy gliches were you couldnt hear shit. As for more the movie It was okay. In my opinion this release should get nuked. As for the movie it's not worth a svcd release. Overall stay away from this release.


Posted by WiZZLa on 06-05-2002 03:59 AM:

quote:
Originally posted by dedHED


well when they jump on a movie and release it with thier typical crap quality... alot of times other real groups that CARE about quality wont release it because its already been done (sometimes big movies are re-released but in general not) and that what makes it suck! :-)



actually, releasing a movie that was already released is allowed if the quality is better. most groups do that, thus the PROPERS and FIXED and READ.NFO along with the labels.


Posted by rolandtn on 06-05-2002 04:38 AM:

One of the better FTF releases

This is one of the better FTF releases. Good speed on the release . Sound seemed a little dense, but pic decent for TS


Posted by dedHED on 06-05-2002 06:54 AM:

Angry and it gets nuked

yea and ALOT of sites NUKE shit like that or have it right in tha rules to not up that stuff (which is stoopid) and then on top of that most sites (smart ones) nuke ftf right off tha bat (so then even IF you wanted to deal with lame ass shi* quality to see tha movie you were craving so bad YOU CANT!) comon folks we all know how these picky ass nuke0matic siteops werk...



*wow all this typin about nuttin sure seems a waste of my time... but oh well were else can I vent about anti-quality fux who bring down the whole vcd scene like FtF?


Posted by ^Om3n on 06-05-2002 12:06 PM:

I guess you we're too blind to see the good quality releases and pre' releases they do. I don't see any other group consistantly releases pre theatre TSs do you? FTF do not release shit, rather it is deminished in quality in comparrison to groups such as Centropy.

Yhose that nuke FTF right off the bat should grow up and not be so damn biased simply because of the name attached.

ps. i don't see people bitching at EVERY UTi release, there quality is in the same range as FTF. The only difference is that LD and UTi releases are labled CAM. Infact LD/UTi get quite allot of praise for the CAMs they do.

__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?


Posted by frak on 06-05-2002 03:31 PM:

I just watched the FTF release.

The video is watchable, same quality as van wilder.

The sound is horrible, it cuts out in places, drops down to a whisper in others for periods of 1-2 minutes.

The movie is funny, worth the d/l i suppose.

However, if yer gonna waste bandwidth, get a better version.


Posted by VCDem0n on 06-05-2002 03:52 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by ^Om3n
I guess you we're too blind to see the good quality releases and pre' releases they do. I don't see any other group consistantly releases pre theatre TSs do you? FTF do not release shit, rather it is deminished in quality in comparrison to groups such as Centropy.

Yhose that nuke FTF right off the bat should grow up and not be so damn biased simply because of the name attached.

ps. i don't see people bitching at EVERY UTi release, there quality is in the same range as FTF. The only difference is that LD and UTi releases are labled CAM. Infact LD/UTi get quite allot of praise for the CAMs they do.



FTF constantly rls garbage they never improve all they care about is speed and "pr0ps" not quality which i think is bullshit. UTIs cams are ok but they really screwed the pooch on DOG SOLDIERS a couple of months ago they totally ruined what is a great movie


Posted by ^Om3n on 06-05-2002 04:38 PM:

Ok, have to agree with you there VCDem0n, i also believe in Quality over Quantity. I just think all these morons that constantly bitch at FTF should grow up, i mean they are doing one of two things.
1. Bitching just because it was released by FTF, without even looking at the release therefor not having the slightest clue what it is really like. or
2. Downloading all of them, watching/looking at them and then bitching how bad it is, which is really fucking stupid, why continue to downloading them all to begin with, you would think that people would know what to expect from an FTF release then either get it because they would rather watch a shitty release than not at all and deal, or just not bother. Don't get me wrong, you are meant to comment on quality, its the ones that simply bitch thats its bad without saying why (i think mostly because they havn't actually got it, therefor cant)

As for this release in particular.
Video: the color and quality is very typical of vcd telesync standard and has a few glitches at parts
Audio: totally screwed, practically dies at parts as frak already mentioned, echo's badly and becomes a little staticy now and again.
Movie: it has a few funny points, but a no good story line that drops you'r interest very quickly. Oh and the actor sucks too.

Overall i really wouldn't suggest anybody bother getting it.

Edit: in italics

__________________
"Allen is having a small problem and needs help adjusting his additude" - Flutterby
"K meet of a the have we come in" - fisher @ SummaDayze '04, wtf?


Posted by VCDem0n on 06-05-2002 05:09 PM:

I dont download FTF
once you see the sample FORGETA BOUT IT
FTF has a reputation of a garbage quality rls as i do flaming haha
I WOULD RATHER GET A 8mm PROGECTOR AIM IT ABOVE A TOILET AND RUN THE MOVIE OVER SHITTY TOILET WATER AND WATCH A MOVIE RATHER THAN WATCH A FTF RLS
HAHAHAHA


Posted by dedHED on 06-05-2002 05:21 PM:

I agree

quote:
Originally posted by VCDem0n
I dont download FTF
once you see the sample FORGETA BOUT IT
FTF has a reputation of a garbage quality rls as i do flaming haha
I WOULD RATHER GET A 8mm PROGECTOR AIM IT ABOVE A TOILET AND RUN THE MOVIE OVER SHITTY TOILET WATER AND WATCH A MOVIE RATHER THAN WATCH A FTF RLS
HAHAHAHA



LMAO!!!!

ISNT THAT THE DAMN TRUTH!

its not about about COMPARING quality, its about quality peroid! If i download it and watch it, then it had BETTER be GOOD quality no matter WHO the group is! The only reason ppl bust on FTF is because its a pretty much guarentee that WHATEVER they touch turns to sh*t... I only download good new big hot movies, and ftf is always ruining those caliper of movies. And I ALWAYS watch a movie b4 posting or commenting on it, yes WHOLE fargin movie, not sample, not jpg W H O L E FARGIN MOVIE! (even FTFs) yes i still waste my time and bandwidth grabbin ftf crap, but i am always in fear that the movie I want to see will not be done RIGHT by another group or if it IS done right may get nuked b4 i grab it. Oh and exzactly WHAT movie has FTF done that you call quality???? who givues a SHI* about pre releases if they SUCK?


Posted by Peilo on 06-05-2002 05:42 PM:

tehehe

funny shit guy


quote:
Originally posted by VCDem0n
I dont download FTF
once you see the sample FORGETA BOUT IT
FTF has a reputation of a garbage quality rls as i do flaming haha
I WOULD RATHER GET A 8mm PROGECTOR AIM IT ABOVE A TOILET AND RUN THE MOVIE OVER SHITTY TOILET WATER AND WATCH A MOVIE RATHER THAN WATCH A FTF RLS
HAHAHAHA


Posted by WiZZLa on 06-05-2002 09:08 PM:

dedhed, if you "know every ftf touches turns to shit" yet still download it, then it's partially your own fault since you "know" what to expect, thus you can't bitch at their quality when the whole download you were expecting it.


Posted by VCDem0n on 06-05-2002 09:35 PM:

I cant get over that RAVER quote ahhahahah


Posted by realized on 06-07-2002 02:18 AM:

CTP's ISN'T TELESYNC????

In the CTP Release of Undercover brother there are two places near the last 30 min of the movie where you can see the MIC from "the sky" comming down so it can be near the actors / record everything, and a camera moving from the left to the right...


I doubt that the film is in the theatear like this, but why would ctp release a "Telesync" if its reallly not ?


Posted by error404 on 06-07-2002 08:23 AM:

Smile

hmm...I might get this Version for once I actually heard that FTF released a Watchable Version of a movie.


Posted by VCDem0n on 06-07-2002 04:35 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by error404
hmm...I might get this Version for once I actually heard that FTF released a Watchable Version of a movie.


answer: go up six replies ahahahah


Posted by frak on 06-08-2002 01:07 PM:

I will say this in addition.

Sure FTF's quality on 95% of the releases sucks anus.

But at least they are getting stuff out, I'd hate to see this scene die off.

And the real reason for my second post.. LOL

did anyone else release a good version of Van Wilder? I actually like the movie, but the FTF release I got.....well..... you know.

haha

frak


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:25 AM. Pages (4): « 1 2 [3] 4 »
Show all 61 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.