VCDQuality Forums Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]
Show all 47 posts from this thread on one page

VCDQuality Forums (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/index.php)
- VCD (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?forumid=19)
-- The Butterfly Effect *NUKED* - TELESYNC - FTF (http://www.vcdhq.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=33376)


Posted by nicci on 01-26-2004 12:09 PM:

nice release, thx ftf

seems noone watched the movie except me...

6/5/8

a weird, crazy, nice movie... love it


Posted by php on 01-26-2004 01:40 PM:

There's one thing I don't get. Why the hell do people, who went to the cinema to watch this movie, come here and start talking about this? This forum is for the discussion of the respective releases, not of the movies themselves! Half the people above wrote crap like "I went to the cinema last night and I liked the movie." Great, now that's interesting...NOT! If you can't download a movie on your goddamn modems, then stay away from the forum, go to rottentomatoes.com or some place else and talk there about the movie.

ok, so here are my two euro cents about this release: it's a perfect TS, all of you who complained are just spoilt brats, buying cinema tickets from your daddies' money and then bitching around without knowing what you are talking about, 'cause you just downloaded the mpeg sample or just looked at the jpeg picture. Then you come here and start babbling around as if you knew what you are talking about.

I downloaded and watched the whole release and in my opinion it's

7 for video quality. yes, 7! watched it on tv through an mpeg hardware decoder and quality is very good due to the tv's natural antialiasing. it's your own goddamn fault if you watch the releases on your monitor through some stupid software player.

6 for audio. what hiss are you talking about? audio quality is very good! as I said before, you are just spoilt brats, you want to have screener quality, and if it's not, you start bitching aroung, calling it a CAM. ridiculous!

5 for the movie itself, it's not exactly stupid, but I wouldn't go so far as calling it intelligent. but there's some suspense in it, so if you haven't got anything to do, then go ahead and watch it.

so - 7/6/5


Posted by Neversoft on 01-26-2004 03:51 PM:

quote:
Originally posted by php
There's one thing I don't get. Why the hell do people, who went to the cinema to watch this movie, come here and start talking about this? This forum is for the discussion of the respective releases, not of the movies themselves! Half the people above wrote crap like "I went to the cinema last night and I liked the movie." Great, now that's interesting...NOT! If you can't download a movie on your goddamn modems, then stay away from the forum, go to rottentomatoes.com or some place else and talk there about the movie.

ok, so here are my two euro cents about this release: it's a perfect TS, all of you who complained are just spoilt brats, buying cinema tickets from your daddies' money and then bitching around without knowing what you are talking about, 'cause you just downloaded the mpeg sample or just looked at the jpeg picture. Then you come here and start babbling around as if you knew what you are talking about.

I downloaded and watched the whole release and in my opinion it's

7 for video quality. yes, 7! watched it on tv through an mpeg hardware decoder and quality is very good due to the tv's natural antialiasing. it's your own goddamn fault if you watch the releases on your monitor through some stupid software player.

6 for audio. what hiss are you talking about? audio quality is very good! as I said before, you are just spoilt brats, you want to have screener quality, and if it's not, you start bitching aroung, calling it a CAM. ridiculous!

5 for the movie itself, it's not exactly stupid, but I wouldn't go so far as calling it intelligent. but there's some suspense in it, so if you haven't got anything to do, then go ahead and watch it.

so - 7/6/5

You Sir, are a fucking idiot. I'm pleased that you liked the quality of this release, good luck to you - the rest of us were dissapointed. This release doesn't warrant more than a 5 for video and 4 for audio, and yes, that's after tidying the picture up using my swanky little SVGA>RGB converter and viewing on my 36" Sony TV... It's still ugly!!


Posted by nicci on 01-26-2004 05:46 PM:

hehe. exactly like it is, FTF got nuked before anyone can watch more then the sample....so dont read any of the first 10-15 postings here, its more then useless.
FTF rocks since years, they r most earliest and allmost watchable, that counts, no iamthefirst-poster of sum bored kids....

so keep ur good work !


Posted by DvdKid on 01-26-2004 05:51 PM:

Smile

well i think that this release could have been a lot better sounds sux and picture is not that good didnt even want to watch it i will wait for a better release. Cause i hear the movie is good.


Posted by ForumLamer on 01-26-2004 10:22 PM:

The movie skips on the first part, I'm not sure how much it does but it jumps and you just don't know what the shit is going on, I haven't finished watching it yet.. probably get the Fujitive release...


Posted by SleepysHell on 01-27-2004 09:32 PM:

Thumbs up

audio was hissy - 4
video was dark - 4
movie was great and i hate ashton cooter
still give it a 9
didnt know he could actually act a role besides the village idiot
impressive

thanks FTF!


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:39 AM. Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]
Show all 47 posts from this thread on one page

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
Copyright © Jelsoft Enterprises Limited 2000 - 2002.